canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers

I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it

I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't

for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts
and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key

I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very
unlikely event I suspect.

aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes

BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do

"an old friend" wrote in
ups.com:

canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers

I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it

I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't

for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts
and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key

I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very
unlikely event I suspect.

aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes

BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do


Lazy.

SC

an old friend wrote:
canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

Who cares?

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers

Of course you're not. Why would you want to be able to
communicate effectively in real time with others who don't share your
language...!??!

Of course you already have the problem of not being able to
effectively communicate with those who DO share your language....

I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it

You spent squat. You never tried...or at least never tried more
than once...Once it was apparent that this was something that you'd
really have to apply yourself to get, you QUIT.

I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't

Who cares what you feel? You're an idiot.

for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts...(SNIP)

Liar.

(UNSNIP)...and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key

What's a "terreail" contact?

I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very
unlikely event I suspect.

Liar.

aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes

Then we have something in common...The ARS is hoping to hear of
YOUR demise too!

BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do

OK...You're not lazy...You're an idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers


I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it


I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't


for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts
and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key


I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very

unlikely event I suspect.


aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes


BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do

"an old friend" wrote in
oups.com:

canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers


I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it


I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't


for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts
and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key


I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very

unlikely event I suspect.


aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes


BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do



Lazy!

SC

nobodys old friend wrote:
canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

Who cares?

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers

Of course you're not. Why would you want to be able to
communicate effectively in real time with others who don't share your
language...!??!

Of course you already have the problem of not being able to
effectively communicate with those who DO share your language....

I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it

You spent squat. You never tried...or at least never tried more
than once...Once it was apparent that this was something that you'd
really have to apply yourself to get, you QUIT.

I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't

Who cares what you feel? You're an idiot.

for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts...(SNIP)

Liar.

(UNSNIP)...and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key

What's a "terreail" contact?

I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very
unlikely event I suspect.

Liar.

aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes

Then we have something in common...The ARS is hoping to hear of
YOUR demise too!

BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do


OK...You're not lazy...You're an idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers


I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it


I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't


for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts
and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key


I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very

unlikely event I suspect.


aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes


BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do

nobodys old friend wrote:
canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

Who cares?

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers

Of course you're not. Why would you want to be able to
communicate effectively in real time with others who don't share your
language...!??!

Of course you already have the problem of not being able to
effectively communicate with those who DO share your language....

I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it

You spent squat. You never tried...or at least never tried more
than once...Once it was apparent that this was something that you'd
really have to apply yourself to get, you QUIT.

I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't

Who cares what you feel? You're an idiot.

for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts...(SNIP)

Liar.

(UNSNIP)...and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key

What's a "terreail" contact?

I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very
unlikely event I suspect.

Liar.

aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes

Then we have something in common...The ARS is hoping to hear of
YOUR demise too!

BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do

OK...You're not lazy...You're an idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

canyou get it through your head I have xero interest in Morse Code

if you could give me the abilty to read it I would not use it since I
am not interested in what it offers


I have psent a good part of youth on the mode and I will waste no more
time on it


I don't feel that Ham is CW, the FCC and the ARRL agree it isn't


for the type of contacts I could make with CW I can make much the same
contact using JT 65 modes which I have made afew moon bounce contacts
and in creasing number of terreail contact using MS based proagation
and all without having to listen to static. If I listen to static I
want to hear a person not a machine be it computer or code key


I will can and will listen for the off chance of hearing either SOS or
OSO if I hear either I boot up my CW reading program and try to help
out if it apreas I can read the signal and no one is responding. a very

unlikely event I suspect.


aside from that nothing could get to to use that mode. ona personal
level I DO despise it and hope to hear its demise (by the volontary
disuse of the ARS the last bastition of CW use) I may not live that
long, but I have hopes


BTW calling some one lazy is just not a good way to get to them to do
something you want them to to do

an old friend continues to refuse to get back on his meds:
N9OGL still hasn't got a clue:
Slow Code wrote:
Thanks. You need to contact Mark to see what speed he wants.

Sc

You seem to misunderstand that Omega One Radio is a BROADCAST station,
not an amateur station.

No..."Omega One Radio" is a pirate station. And even if it were
within Part 15 limits, it STILL would not be a "broadcast station".

slwo code understands even less than steve

Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan.

Enjoy your win.

Steve, K4YZ