| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
September 8th 06, 12:50 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
I could support that. SC |
|
#2
September 8th 06, 01:17 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:50:10 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly: I could support that. I could not. |
|
#3
September 8th 06, 01:35 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
you are not a good ham if you flood the ham news groups
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:07:16 -0400, wrote:
[stuff from a bad ham flushed] http://marksspamblog.blogspot.com ---- In message . com, Mark Morgan said "I hit a cop in the balls who was roughing up my mother ..." |
|
#4
September 8th 06, 07:34 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... I could support that. SC Even if the no-code ticket was made 6 months or 2 years in active length it would not matter one bit. Amateur radio in the public eye is unknown and your average young person is far more interested in the Internet, online video, instant text messaging and cellphones. There are too many commercially available technologies, which are far cheaper I may add, than amateur radio which while a curosity is still a functionally and technologically obsolete pursuit. Sorry but that's the truth. |
|
#5
September 8th 06, 08:46 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
No support.
"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... I could support that. SC -- SeeYaa  Harbin Osteen KG6UROWhen American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too? - |
|
#6
September 8th 06, 11:29 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
you are not a good ham if you flood the ham news groups
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:48:59 -0400, wrote:
[self-serving fantasies flushed] You are in need of psychiatric help, Mark. http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org ---- In message .com, makes a death threat when he writes "the mostly ooccasion [sic] where where you might it will be seconds before you die." |
|
#7
September 8th 06, 02:16 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Get a life......
"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... I could support that. SC |
|
#8
September 9th 06, 03:28 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC |
|
#9
September 9th 06, 03:47 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
Douche Bag wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. not dead dispite the efforts folks like the arrl and slow code to kill it |
|
#10
September 9th 06, 09:03 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or a little bit of effort. The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters. -- -fb- |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
