LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old September 15th 06, 06:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 493
Default Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.


wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license
for experimenting. read the rules.

http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html

BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55
dollars, hell anyone can afford that!

Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or
broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields.


You didn't get the point (but, then, you rarely do). What I meant was
that they could easily rewrite Part 15 or any other rule to restrict
experimenting even further. We don't want that.


no dumbass YOU don't get the point Part 15 wasn't designed for
experimenting, it was designed for unwanted field emissions like what a
computer radiates off, or off type accepted transmitter. Cordless
phones and BPL are two other thing govern by Part 15 but if you read
ALL of part 15 that is what part 15 is for. If you want to experiment
get an experimental license. Don't come on here and claim "oh, he's
breaking the law, now the FCC is going to tighten the rules governing
part 15, in reality they are NOT going to change the rules because one
person breaks the rules.You seem to lack understanding on that and I'm
not going to debate it with someone who has no understanding of it.
Because I'll tell you what a number of people has broken Part 15 over
the years and has been busted by the FCC (see Dugan V FCC, Dugan was
running a pirate radio station on the FM broadcast band and was busted
by the FCC who claimed he was in violation of Part 15, the US Court of
Appeal up held it) Did the FCC change the rule after Dugan or any other
pirate on the FM band after the FCC busted them for violating Part 15??
Answer NO, the rule has remained the same before and after all those
pirates has been busted. Your claim that the FCC will tighten the rules
because I might be violating Part 15 doesn't hold water. I suggest
before you get on here and claim something that you better do some
deep research into the matter.


You bring up a good question, though. If it's so cheap and easy to get
an experimental license, why didn't you get one for your operation on
13.556 MHz? Then this entire discussion would be moot.


Because you can't get an experimental license for Broadcasting, many
people has tried.


Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 01:28 PM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st Dwight Stewart Policy 300 August 12th 03 12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017