From: on Sat, Sep 23 2006 1:51 pm

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Opus- wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:19:27 -0400, jawod spake


What a coincidence...I used QRZ's database search engine and found
a blank when I entered "Leonard H. Anderson".

Funny, eh...?!?!

Funny? No.

Stupid? Yes.

I guess the only excercise you ever get is your exercise in futility.
Even Len will tell you that he's not a ham, but you knew that already.

The USMC imposter feels compelled to vent hate against
all who disbelieve him. shrug Never mind that he has
NEVER made available ANY third-party proof of his alleged
18-year USMC career. He feels that everyone "must"
believe his words and never mind any proof.

Back in 1998-1999 on FCC 98-143 ("Reconstruction NPRM)
there DID exist a licensed radio amateur named Leonard
H. Anderson...but his mailing address was in Montana,
not California where I've been since 1956.

When I checked QRZ under AB8O, the bio page was there but
all response data had been deleted. Why I have no idea.
One will have to ask John (AB8O, "Jawod") about that.

Out of curiosity last year ( two years ago?) I did a
Search for my name. It is somewhat common, surname
certainly, given name slightly. Interesting results:

A USMC Major (a real one) with the Navy's Blue Angels
was named Leonard Anderson. :-) Think about that:
USMC, a real commissioned officer, and good enough to
fly as part of the Blue Angels! Kind of beats this
"CAP Captain" posing in a used poopy suit with snot on
his moustache. Poor CAP man is only single-engine
rated yet loved to say he was "pilot in command!" :-)

There was a black actor in an entertainment registry
named Leonard Anderson. Buff, hunky guy maybe 30.
There was a white music teacher named Leonard Anderson,
maybe coming up on 50, not a "hunk" but appreciated by
his school and community.

A quick name search at QRZ this morning turns up three
licensed US radio amateurs named Leonard Anderson, but
none of them have the same middle initial.

Now all that is really irrelevant except to members
of the morseketeers in here, namely Heil. In order not
to offend his apparent sensibilities, one MUST have a
valid amateur radio license in order to talk about
obtaining an amateur radio license! That is to avoid
"telling him what to do!" :-)

NB: NO ONE can tell Heil what to do. He tells all
others what to do. :-)

This is all so hilarious! :-)

wrote:

Now all that is really irrelevant except to members
of the morseketeers in here, namely Heil. In order not
to offend his apparent sensibilities, one MUST have a
valid amateur radio license in order to talk about
obtaining an amateur radio license! That is to avoid
"telling him what to do!" :-)

You don't have an amateur radio license. I have taken no action in
attempting to prevent you from posting here. I have taken no action to
preclude your comments to the FCC. Therefore, your statement is false.
I am not bound to accept your often outrageous statements without
responding. Ridiculing you or laughing at you is not forbidden. Deal
with it.

NB: NO ONE can tell Heil what to do.

You certainly may not tell me what to do. You have no power over me at
all. Deal with it.

He tells all
others what to do. :-)

That, like the balance of your statement above, is an untruth.

This is all so hilarious! :-)

It certainly is, especially when you think that others are laughing
*with* you.