"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com:

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Hmmmm....

NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.156.121.130
http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm

I wonder if Adam Vocks knows you operate a private web server and if
having a private web-server is a TOS violation, and if they care that you
promote illegal radio activity with it.

A few of us here might have to pop off an ole' email to Adam to let him
know about it. BWAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAA



OrgName: COMPUTER TECHNIQUES ACC BUSINES
OrgID: CTAB
Address: 1100 SPORTSMAN DR
City: TAYLORVILLE
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 62568
Country: US

NetRange: 12.156.120.0 - 12.156.127.255
CIDR: 12.156.120.0/21
NetName: COMPUTER49-120
NetHandle: NET-12-156-120-0-1
Parent: NET-12-0-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-04-26
Updated: 2004-04-26

OrgTechHandle: AVO3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Vocks, Adam
OrgTechPhone: +1-217-824-6398
OrgTechEmail:

Slow Code wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com:

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Hmmmm....

NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.156.121.130
http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm

I wonder if Adam Vocks knows you operate a private web server and if
having a private web-server is a TOS violation, and if they care that you
promote illegal radio activity with it.

A few of us here might have to pop off an ole' email to Adam to let him
know about it. BWAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAA



OrgName: COMPUTER TECHNIQUES ACC BUSINES
OrgID: CTAB
Address: 1100 SPORTSMAN DR
City: TAYLORVILLE
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 62568
Country: US

NetRange: 12.156.120.0 - 12.156.127.255
CIDR: 12.156.120.0/21
NetName: COMPUTER49-120
NetHandle: NET-12-156-120-0-1
Parent: NET-12-0-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-04-26
Updated: 2004-04-26

OrgTechHandle: AVO3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Vocks, Adam
OrgTechPhone: +1-217-824-6398
OrgTechEmail:

How's it promoting illegal activity??? All that's on it is a letter
from the FCC and a letter from the Attorney General....your make
frivious claims that does not hold any water.

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

Slow Code wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com:

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Hmmmm....

NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.156.121.130
http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm

I wonder if Adam Vocks knows you operate a private web server and if
having a private web-server is a TOS violation, and if they care that you
promote illegal radio activity with it.

A few of us here might have to pop off an ole' email to Adam to let him
know about it. BWAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAA



OrgName: COMPUTER TECHNIQUES ACC BUSINES
OrgID: CTAB
Address: 1100 SPORTSMAN DR
City: TAYLORVILLE
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 62568
Country: US

NetRange: 12.156.120.0 - 12.156.127.255
CIDR: 12.156.120.0/21
NetName: COMPUTER49-120
NetHandle: NET-12-156-120-0-1
Parent: NET-12-0-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-04-26
Updated: 2004-04-26

OrgTechHandle: AVO3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Vocks, Adam
OrgTechPhone: +1-217-824-6398
OrgTechEmail:

Having a private server isn't against the tos alsong as there is
nothing obscene or indecent or pornographic on it....try again you
****ing dumbass

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

In other words, Toad, if you want to play lumberjack, learn to handle
your end of the log.

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!


In other words, Toad, if you want to play lumberjack, learn to handle
your end of the log.

"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com:


wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!




Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Hold up your end of the log!

SC

Slow Code wrote:
"
slow code stalker at large

N9OGL wrote:

wrote:
RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!

The only way anyone can have you TOSsed is to complain. The ISP then
looks at what they are complaining about and, whaddaya know, Toad IS
sending virtual kiddie porn through their data stream! Bye, bye, Toad.

ISPs are very sensitive to that kind of stuff and tend to err on the
side of caution. Miller decision or not, they don't want to possibly
expose themselves to legal liability and the few bucks they make off of
you every month isn't nearly enough to justify the risk (in their
minds).

It's up to the ISP to actually determine whether you have committed a
violation of their Terms of Service (in other words, committed breach
of contract). If two ISPs independently came to the conclusion that
the stuff you were putting through their data streams was a TOS
violation, there had to be a good reason.

You read the First Amendment like you read Part 15 - it means what you
want it to mean, not what it says.

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

wrote:
RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!

The only way anyone can have you TOSsed is to complain. The ISP then
looks at what they are complaining about and, whaddaya know, Toad IS
sending virtual kiddie porn through their data stream! Bye, bye, Toad.

ISPs are very sensitive to that kind of stuff and tend to err on the
side of caution. Miller decision or not, they don't want to possibly
expose themselves to legal liability and the few bucks they make off of
you every month isn't nearly enough to justify the risk (in their
minds).

No but there IS federal law that do protect ISP from "liability"
including the CDA which states an ISP can not be held liable what their
user post or send. I really suggest you read other laws beside the
court case of Miller V Californmia. Try Verizon Vs RIAA (in Verzion v
RIAA, the US Court of Appeal stated that an ISP is not responsible for
what their users transmit and was not liable for copyright infringment.
citing CDA and the DMCA safe habour provision.

It's up to the ISP to actually determine whether you have committed a
violation of their Terms of Service (in other words, committed breach
of contract). If two ISPs independently came to the conclusion that
the stuff you were putting through their data streams was a TOS
violation, there had to be a good reason.

The problem is however, In Illinois according to my lawyer, a ISP is
consider a public Utlility and is such regulated by the state. Like I
said before when you suggested that I start my own ISP, the reason is
the city limits how many ISP are allowed the town (just like do with
cable) and you have to obtain a permit which cost thousands and
thousands of dollars. Internet here is regulated by both the city and
the state.


Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.5565.00 LSB

You read the First Amendment like you read Part 15 - it means what you
want it to mean, not what it says.