Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com:


wrote:

Assistant to FCC Section Chief: "Hey, boss, we just got some requests
for LPTV waivers from some guy in Illinois named Todd Daugherty."

FCC Section Chief: "Todd...who? Oh, yeah...HIM again. Isn't he the
guy who calls us all sorts of names on the Internet and brags about
being a pirate?"


DUMBASS I APPLIED LONG BEFORE I STARTED BRAGGING I WAS A ****ING PIRATE
AND DID THAT OTHER **** ...SO **** YOU....YOU DON'T KNOW ****!!!!

TODD N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB


ROFL

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...

"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com:


wrote:

Assistant to FCC Section Chief: "Hey, boss, we just got some requests
for LPTV waivers from some guy in Illinois named Todd Daugherty."

FCC Section Chief: "Todd...who? Oh, yeah...HIM again. Isn't he the
guy who calls us all sorts of names on the Internet and brags about
being a pirate?"


DUMBASS I APPLIED LONG BEFORE I STARTED BRAGGING I WAS A ****ING PIRATE
AND DID THAT OTHER **** ...SO **** YOU....YOU DON'T KNOW ****!!!!

TODD N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB


ROFL

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

Hey TOAD,

I just couldn't resist....I see your now a world class dumbass
bootlegger. You not only are operating illegally but your bragging it
up. What's next? You gonna shoot up the local cops and go to prison
for life? Dumbass.

Dan/W4NTI

Slow Code wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com:


wrote:

Assistant to FCC Section Chief: "Hey, boss, we just got some requests
for LPTV waivers from some guy in Illinois named Todd Daugherty."

FCC Section Chief: "Todd...who? Oh, yeah...HIM again. Isn't he the
guy who calls us all sorts of names on the Internet and brags about
being a pirate?"


DUMBASS I APPLIED LONG BEFORE I STARTED BRAGGING I WAS A ****ING PIRATE
AND DID THAT OTHER **** ...SO **** YOU....YOU DON'T KNOW ****!!!!

TODD N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB


ROFL

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

HAM RADIO SUPPRESSORS OF FREE SPEECH ON AND OFF THE RADIO!!!
AND USES A FEDERAL FUND AGENCY (FCC) TO SUPPRESS THAT SPEECH!!!

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

N9OGL wrote:
No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Only if you use the ISP to disseminate your virtual child porn.
Otherwise, do what you want on the 'net. And don't trot out your
standard argument about "the Supreme Court says it's legal." Slavery
was once legal, too; did that make it right? Obviously the ISPs agreed
because they TOSsed your ass.


HAM RADIO SUPPRESSORS OF FREE SPEECH ON AND OFF THE RADIO!!!
AND USES A FEDERAL FUND AGENCY (FCC) TO SUPPRESS THAT SPEECH!!!

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes made the classic comment on free speech
when he said that the right of free speech does not give you the right
to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.

Nobody is suppressing your free speech except you. An ISP is a private
company and is free to contract for service as they see fit as long as
they don't violate the law. Your ISPs had TOS provisions against porn
and they interpreted what you were doing as a violation of their TOS.
The ISP is not the government and the Internet is not owned by the
government (yet; they're working on it, though).

At the risk of creating a monster, here's an idea: why don't you set up
your own ISP? Then you can have any terms of service you like. It's
easy to do and really doesn't cost that much in startup capital. You
might even be able to get in on the ground floor of BPL in your area.

I can see it now: Toddlink, dialup for $9.95/mo, broadband for
$29.95/mo.

Who knows? You might even make enough money to be able to afford to
replace Omega One's "coax with big freaking holes in it."

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Only if you use the ISP to disseminate your virtual child porn.
Otherwise, do what you want on the 'net. And don't trot out your
standard argument about "the Supreme Court says it's legal." Slavery
was once legal, too; did that make it right? Obviously the ISPs agreed
because they TOSsed your ass.


It is customary on the Internet, that an ISP to notify their users that
they might be violation of their tos before removing them, I recieved
no such warning...but hey that 28 page letter i sent to the Attorney
Genery should expalin it all.

HAM RADIO SUPPRESSORS OF FREE SPEECH ON AND OFF THE RADIO!!!
AND USES A FEDERAL FUND AGENCY (FCC) TO SUPPRESS THAT SPEECH!!!

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes made the classic comment on free speech
when he said that the right of free speech does not give you the right
to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is no fire.

Nobody is suppressing your free speech except you. An ISP is a private
company and is free to contract for service as they see fit as long as
they don't violate the law. Your ISPs had TOS provisions against porn
and they interpreted what you were doing as a violation of their TOS.
The ISP is not the government and the Internet is not owned by the
government (yet; they're working on it, though).

No dumbass, the ****ing bottom line is if you don't like what's on a
****ing web site then do ****ing go there, but hey your a stupid cock
sucker and don't know ****

At the risk of creating a monster, here's an idea: why don't you set up
your own ISP? Then you can have any terms of service you like. It's
easy to do and really doesn't cost that much in startup capital. You
might even be able to get in on the ground floor of BPL in your area.


Can't city passed a ordiinance limiting the number of ISP in this town.

I can see it now: Toddlink, dialup for $9.95/mo, broadband for
$29.95/mo.

Who knows? You might even make enough money to be able to afford to
replace Omega One's "coax with big freaking holes in it."

.... and maybe you can eat **** and ****ing die!!

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote:
funny their legal is no such thing as virtual kiddy porn
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

There most certainly is such a thing as virtual kiddy porn. In the
Miller decision, the Supreme Court recognized that there was but didn't
directly address the legality of it.

The physical medium by which the porn is conveyed (hardcopy media,
digital media, etc.) is not the problem. The problem is HOW the porn
is created. In the case of child porn, real children are exploited in
the creation of the images. Children, unlike adults, are legally
considered incapable of deciding of their own free will to participate
in the creation of pornography. That makes creation of that kind of
child porn illegal under a host of criminal statutes.

Anime that portrays cartoon children engaged in sexual acts is not
child pornography by the legal definition. However, it is considered
to be such by most rational adults.

If you want to create virtual child porn there is no law (as of now)
that prohibits you from doing it. But there is also no law that says
anyone has to like it and also no law that says private individuals
have to assist you in its dissemination. If your ISP doesn't like it
they can terminate your service. You can take them to court but it's
doubtful that you would get anywhere. Judges have children, too.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

N9OGL wrote:
It is customary on the Internet, that an ISP to notify their users that
they might be violation of their tos before removing them, I recieved
no such warning...but hey that 28 page letter i sent to the Attorney
Genery should expalin it all.

No dumbass, the ****ing bottom line is if you don't like what's on a
****ing web site then do ****ing go there, but hey your a stupid cock
sucker and don't know ****

At the risk of creating a monster, here's an idea: why don't you set up
your own ISP? Then you can have any terms of service you like. It's
easy to do and really doesn't cost that much in startup capital. You
might even be able to get in on the ground floor of BPL in your area.

Can't city passed a ordiinance limiting the number of ISP in this town.

... and maybe you can eat **** and ****ing die!!

Could be that the ISP ordinance in Taylorville was passed primarily to
keep you off the 'net, which would say a lot. By the way, does your 28
page letter to the Attorney Genery [sic] tell him to "eat ### and
####### die" if he doesn't do what you want him to?

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It is customary on the Internet, that an ISP to notify their users that
they might be violation of their tos before removing them, I recieved
no such warning...but hey that 28 page letter i sent to the Attorney
Genery should expalin it all.

No dumbass, the ****ing bottom line is if you don't like what's on a
****ing web site then do ****ing go there, but hey your a stupid cock
sucker and don't know ****

At the risk of creating a monster, here's an idea: why don't you set up
your own ISP? Then you can have any terms of service you like. It's
easy to do and really doesn't cost that much in startup capital. You
might even be able to get in on the ground floor of BPL in your area.

Can't city passed a ordiinance limiting the number of ISP in this town.

... and maybe you can eat **** and ****ing die!!

Could be that the ISP ordinance in Taylorville was passed primarily to
keep you off the 'net, which would say a lot. By the way, does your 28
page letter to the Attorney Genery [sic] tell him to "eat ### and
####### die" if he doesn't do what you want him to?

no, but I would like YOU too, DIP****.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote:

funny how the Jappnesse see it deferently being ther are about as many
of them as us your statement is a best ameriocontritic at worst plain
bigrotry

The Japanese can see it any way they want. Americans see it
differently. In certain African countries, compulsory clitoridectomies
of young women are considered normal and part of their tribal culture.
Americans see the practice as abhorrent. Different cultures interpret
things differently.


as do many of the far eastern cultures nor was it ever established
that children were being depicted youand other decided that it could
only b children that are dipcted by anime

I'll answer that as soon as you translate it into English.


it is your prevledge to dislike such materail I personaly don't care
for the stuff but I am not so judgemental as you et al

No, you would rather do it than look at it. Just don't do it around my
kids or I'll introduce you to my attorneys: Colt, Ruger, Beretta, Smith
& Wesson.


In theory Todd should be protected by th e courts increasing those
protections are breaking down in practice in theory those that have
been going after should be brought to trail themselves fo r conspricay
to stalk and harrass, not likely In practice

Again, translate that into English, please. I think you said that Todd
is protected by the courts. And he is, but only to the extent that he
is protected from censorship BY THE GOVERNMENT. If his ISP, which is a
private company, doesn't like what Todd is putting through their data
stream they have every right to pull the plug on his service.


but ti is amusing the way those that Atack Todd all hide their names
(with the exception of Robeson), and all (without exception sem to
have serious sexious issues fo their own


English, dammit, English! I suppose you were born with the name "an
old friend?"

###
 

wrote:
On 14 Sep 2006 22:05:55 -0700, wrote:


N9OGL wrote:
It is customary on the Internet, that an ISP to notify their users that
they might be violation of their tos before removing them, I recieved
no such warning...but hey that 28 page letter i sent to the Attorney
Genery should expalin it all.

No dumbass, the ****ing bottom line is if you don't like what's on a
****ing web site then do ****ing go there, but hey your a stupid cock
sucker and don't know ****

At the risk of creating a monster, here's an idea: why don't you set up
your own ISP? Then you can have any terms of service you like. It's
easy to do and really doesn't cost that much in startup capital. You
might even be able to get in on the ground floor of BPL in your area.

Can't city passed a ordiinance limiting the number of ISP in this town.

... and maybe you can eat **** and ****ing die!!

Could be that the ISP ordinance in Taylorville was passed primarily to
keep you off the 'net, which would say a lot.
if that were true it could not hold if Todd could prove
By the way, does your 28
page letter to the Attorney Genery [sic] tell him to "eat ### and
####### die" if he doesn't do what you want him to?
I doubt it says "eat ### and ####### die" it [pprobaly does not nt eat
**** and die asshole either Robesonion one but then like Robeson you
fail to realize their is a place for using the word "****" and a place
for susing the word "feces"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote:

The Japanese can see it any way they want. Americans see it
differently.

and you are willig to immpose your views on everyont that is why many
people don't like americans

The reason many people don't like Americans is because of people like
you, Markie, who try to impose their silly, uninformed and illiterate
views on everyone. You and the rest of the Inferior Five have
irreparably trashed this newsgroup with your incessant flaming, and it
is being read by people in other countries. How do you think that
makes Americans look to the rest of the world? Not that you care,
sociopath.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
Hey TOAD,

I just couldn't resist....I see your now a world class dumbass
bootlegger. You not only are operating illegally but your bragging it
up. What's next? You gonna shoot up the local cops and go to prison
for life? Dumbass.

Dan/W4NTI


Dan,
Please don't give him any more ideas.
Ace - WH2T

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote:
wrote:

funny how the Jappnesse see it deferently being ther are about as many
of them as us your statement is a best ameriocontritic at worst plain
bigrotry

The Japanese can see it any way they want. Americans see it
differently. In certain African countries, compulsory clitoridectomies
of young women are considered normal and part of their tribal culture.
Americans see the practice as abhorrent. Different cultures interpret
things differently.


as do many of the far eastern cultures nor was it ever established
that children were being depicted youand other decided that it could
only b children that are dipcted by anime

I'll answer that as soon as you translate it into English.


it is your prevledge to dislike such materail I personaly don't care
for the stuff but I am not so judgemental as you et al

No, you would rather do it than look at it. Just don't do it around my
kids or I'll introduce you to my attorneys: Colt, Ruger, Beretta, Smith
& Wesson.


In theory Todd should be protected by th e courts increasing those
protections are breaking down in practice in theory those that have
been going after should be brought to trail themselves fo r conspricay
to stalk and harrass, not likely In practice

Again, translate that into English, please. I think you said that Todd
is protected by the courts. And he is, but only to the extent that he
is protected from censorship BY THE GOVERNMENT. If his ISP, which is a
private company, doesn't like what Todd is putting through their data
stream they have every right to pull the plug on his service.

The ISP removed me because they believed and was told by the
individuals who complainted that the material was "child pornography"
which it is not, The second problem is "obscenity" it has always been
ruled that only a court can deiced what is obscene, secondly the ISP
has individuals posting material on Adultfinders.com, blogs and other
places on the web which could be consider obscene, so what apply to one
person should apply for all, in this case it does not. Thirdly it is a
common practice amoung ISP to warn a User that they are violation of
their TOS, I recieved no such warning, which now can be consider a "bad
Business practice" since the vast majority of ISP's do warn their users
before removing them from the web. Fourth, the Courts has ruled in
Verizon V RIAA that a ISP doesn't have control of what's on a users
computer, and that and ISP is nothing more then a conduit.(In Verzion V
RIAA, the RIAA sued Verzion fro not handing over the names of
individuals who were sharing music on P2P networks. The Court ruled
that Verzion can't be held accountable for copyright infringement since
the material was on their users computer and not on directly on their
server . Verzion and ISP were nothing more then conduits, like the
phone company and had really no control over the content. ) The CDA
also protects internet service providers of libel for the content their
users put out. The General rule of thumb on the web is, if you don't
like what's on someone website then don't go there. Some of the
individuals visited the site long before complaining and had the chose
not to gom their if they are offended by it. But as for obscentiy goes
as the Supreme court stated "just because one person is offended by the
material doesn't not mean it need to be banned"


Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB




but ti is amusing the way those that Atack Todd all hide their names
(with the exception of Robeson), and all (without exception sem to
have serious sexious issues fo their own


English, dammit, English! I suppose you were born with the name "an
old friend?"

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com:

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Hmmmm....

NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.156.121.130
http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm

I wonder if Adam Vocks knows you operate a private web server and if
having a private web-server is a TOS violation, and if they care that you
promote illegal radio activity with it.

A few of us here might have to pop off an ole' email to Adam to let him
know about it. BWAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAA



OrgName: COMPUTER TECHNIQUES ACC BUSINES
OrgID: CTAB
Address: 1100 SPORTSMAN DR
City: TAYLORVILLE
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 62568
Country: US

NetRange: 12.156.120.0 - 12.156.127.255
CIDR: 12.156.120.0/21
NetName: COMPUTER49-120
NetHandle: NET-12-156-120-0-1
Parent: NET-12-0-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-04-26
Updated: 2004-04-26

OrgTechHandle: AVO3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Vocks, Adam
OrgTechPhone: +1-217-824-6398
OrgTechEmail:

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

Slow Code wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com:

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Hmmmm....

NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.156.121.130
http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm

I wonder if Adam Vocks knows you operate a private web server and if
having a private web-server is a TOS violation, and if they care that you
promote illegal radio activity with it.

A few of us here might have to pop off an ole' email to Adam to let him
know about it. BWAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAA



OrgName: COMPUTER TECHNIQUES ACC BUSINES
OrgID: CTAB
Address: 1100 SPORTSMAN DR
City: TAYLORVILLE
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 62568
Country: US

NetRange: 12.156.120.0 - 12.156.127.255
CIDR: 12.156.120.0/21
NetName: COMPUTER49-120
NetHandle: NET-12-156-120-0-1
Parent: NET-12-0-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-04-26
Updated: 2004-04-26

OrgTechHandle: AVO3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Vocks, Adam
OrgTechPhone: +1-217-824-6398
OrgTechEmail:

How's it promoting illegal activity??? All that's on it is a letter
from the FCC and a letter from the Attorney General....your make
frivious claims that does not hold any water.

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

Slow Code wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com:

No beacause some Licensed ASSHOLE CB OPERATORS had me kicked off all
teh service providers in this town and had threaten if I go to another
one that they complain to them too...

Hmmmm....

NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.156.121.130
http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm

I wonder if Adam Vocks knows you operate a private web server and if
having a private web-server is a TOS violation, and if they care that you
promote illegal radio activity with it.

A few of us here might have to pop off an ole' email to Adam to let him
know about it. BWAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAA



OrgName: COMPUTER TECHNIQUES ACC BUSINES
OrgID: CTAB
Address: 1100 SPORTSMAN DR
City: TAYLORVILLE
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 62568
Country: US

NetRange: 12.156.120.0 - 12.156.127.255
CIDR: 12.156.120.0/21
NetName: COMPUTER49-120
NetHandle: NET-12-156-120-0-1
Parent: NET-12-0-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-04-26
Updated: 2004-04-26

OrgTechHandle: AVO3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Vocks, Adam
OrgTechPhone: +1-217-824-6398
OrgTechEmail:

Having a private server isn't against the tos alsong as there is
nothing obscene or indecent or pornographic on it....try again you
****ing dumbass

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

In other words, Toad, if you want to play lumberjack, learn to handle
your end of the log.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!


In other words, Toad, if you want to play lumberjack, learn to handle
your end of the log.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com:


wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!




Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Hold up your end of the log!

SC

slow code stalker at large
 

Slow Code wrote:
"
slow code stalker at large

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

N9OGL wrote:

wrote:
RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!

The only way anyone can have you TOSsed is to complain. The ISP then
looks at what they are complaining about and, whaddaya know, Toad IS
sending virtual kiddie porn through their data stream! Bye, bye, Toad.

ISPs are very sensitive to that kind of stuff and tend to err on the
side of caution. Miller decision or not, they don't want to possibly
expose themselves to legal liability and the few bucks they make off of
you every month isn't nearly enough to justify the risk (in their
minds).

It's up to the ISP to actually determine whether you have committed a
violation of their Terms of Service (in other words, committed breach
of contract). If two ISPs independently came to the conclusion that
the stuff you were putting through their data streams was a TOS
violation, there had to be a good reason.

You read the First Amendment like you read Part 15 - it means what you
want it to mean, not what it says.

slow code stalker at large
 

Jonathan wrote:

slow code stalker at large

slow code stalker at large
 

Jonathan wrote:
"
slow code stalker at large

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:

The Japanese can see it any way they want. Americans see it
differently.

and you are willig to immpose your views on everyont that is why many
people don't like americans

The reason many people don't like Americans is because of people like
you, Markie, who try to impose their silly, uninformed and illiterate
views on everyone. You and the rest of the Inferior Five have
irreparably trashed this newsgroup with your incessant flaming, and it
is being read by people in other countries. How do you think that
makes Americans look to the rest of the world? Not that you care,
sociopath.

Well said, but trying to talk sense to Mark is a waste of time. Mark is in a
different time zone altogether.

slow code stalker at large
 

Not Lloyd wrote:
"
/slow code stalker at large

slow code stalker at large
 

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Not Lloyd wrote:
"
/slow code stalker at large

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!


In other words, Toad, if you want to play lumberjack, learn to handle
your end of the log.
:-0
(prolly never occured to Toad to cease violating their Terms Of Service....)

slow code stalker at large
 

slow code stalker at large

slow code stalker at large
 

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jonathan wrote:

slow code stalker at large
http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/

slow code stalker at large
 

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Jonathan wrote:
"
slow code stalker at large
http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/

slow code stalker at large
 

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Not Lloyd wrote:
"
/slow code stalker at large

The Myna bird speaks....

slow code stalker at large
 

Not Lloyd wrote:

slow code stalker at large

slow code stalker at large
 

"an old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Not Lloyd wrote:

www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com

slow code stalker at large
 

Not Lloyd wrote:

slow code stalker at large

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!
 

Jonathan wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:

The Japanese can see it any way they want. Americans see it
differently.

and you are willig to immpose your views on everyont that is why many
people don't like americans

The reason many people don't like Americans is because of people like
you, Markie, who try to impose their silly, uninformed and illiterate
views on everyone. You and the rest of the Inferior Five have
irreparably trashed this newsgroup with your incessant flaming, and it
is being read by people in other countries. How do you think that
makes Americans look to the rest of the world? Not that you care,
sociopath.

Well said, but trying to talk sense to Mark is a waste of time. Mark is in a
different time zone altogether.

Yeah, Markie's in the Twilight Zone.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

wrote:
RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!

The only way anyone can have you TOSsed is to complain. The ISP then
looks at what they are complaining about and, whaddaya know, Toad IS
sending virtual kiddie porn through their data stream! Bye, bye, Toad.

ISPs are very sensitive to that kind of stuff and tend to err on the
side of caution. Miller decision or not, they don't want to possibly
expose themselves to legal liability and the few bucks they make off of
you every month isn't nearly enough to justify the risk (in their
minds).

No but there IS federal law that do protect ISP from "liability"
including the CDA which states an ISP can not be held liable what their
user post or send. I really suggest you read other laws beside the
court case of Miller V Californmia. Try Verizon Vs RIAA (in Verzion v
RIAA, the US Court of Appeal stated that an ISP is not responsible for
what their users transmit and was not liable for copyright infringment.
citing CDA and the DMCA safe habour provision.

It's up to the ISP to actually determine whether you have committed a
violation of their Terms of Service (in other words, committed breach
of contract). If two ISPs independently came to the conclusion that
the stuff you were putting through their data streams was a TOS
violation, there had to be a good reason.

The problem is however, In Illinois according to my lawyer, a ISP is
consider a public Utlility and is such regulated by the state. Like I
said before when you suggested that I start my own ISP, the reason is
the city limits how many ISP are allowed the town (just like do with
cable) and you have to obtain a permit which cost thousands and
thousands of dollars. Internet here is regulated by both the city and
the state.


Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.5565.00 LSB

You read the First Amendment like you read Part 15 - it means what you
want it to mean, not what it says.

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

Jonathan wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It's also illegal to harass someone....it is a violation of federal
law....as well as stalking.

True. However, when you post on an open message board you open
yourself up to any and all who wish to either support or rebut your
postings. RRAP and similar boards are not held to the same standards
as private e-mail.

Not true, these indiviuals are stalking and harassing me and had me
alread removed from 2 internet providers and threatened if I go to any
other service provider they would complain to them...that is
stalking...nice try though!!


In other words, Toad, if you want to play lumberjack, learn to handle
your end of the log.
:-0
(prolly never occured to Toad to cease violating their Terms Of Service....)

IT IS ALSO COMMON PRACTICE AMOUNG ISP TO WARN THEIR USERS THAT THEY ARE
VIOLATION, I RECIEVED NO SUCH WARNING THEY SIMPLY SHUT ME OFF WITHOUT
WARNING.

TODD N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One?
 

N9OGL wrote:
No but there IS federal law that do protect ISP from "liability"
including the CDA which states an ISP can not be held liable what their
user post or send. I really suggest you read other laws beside the
court case of Miller V Californmia. Try Verizon Vs RIAA (in Verzion v
RIAA, the US Court of Appeal stated that an ISP is not responsible for
what their users transmit and was not liable for copyright infringment.
citing CDA and the DMCA safe habour provision.

Yes, that's true, as far as it goes. But that is a "blanket"
protection in the sense that the ISP is not expected to monitor
everything that comes through its data stream because that wouldn't be
possible due to the sheer volume of data. However, when something
specific is brought to an ISPs attention the blanket protection is
compromised. When notified of a possible TOS violation the ISP has a
duty to check it out and act if action is warranted. Failure to act on
a specific allegation could expose the ISP to liability for failure to
exercise due diligence.


The problem is however, In Illinois according to my lawyer, a ISP is
consider a public Utlility and is such regulated by the state. Like I
said before when you suggested that I start my own ISP, the reason is
the city limits how many ISP are allowed the town (just like do with
cable) and you have to obtain a permit which cost thousands and
thousands of dollars. Internet here is regulated by both the city and
the state.

That's interesting. I did know that some jurisdictions were beginning
to consider ISPs as public utilities subject to state and local
regulation but I wasn't aware that Illinois was one of them. Sounds to
me like typical politics - make something illegal unless you obtain a
permit, then charge up the arse for the permits. And I would bet that
most of the permits go to large companies who have the financial
wherewithal to bribe the politicians who grant the licenses. Damn
politicians get you coming and going.

That does open a very interesting can of worms, though. Since ISPs in
Illinois are considered public utilities, I would think that it would
be extremely difficult to TOS someone. After all, the electric company
is a public utility and they can't arbitrarily terminate your service
just because they don't like you; about the only thing they can
terminate service for is nonpayment of the bill.