About Us

[email protected] · September 27th 06, 06:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

From: on Tues, Sep 26 2006 5:30 pm

wrote:
on Sat, Sep 23 2006 7:06 pm
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Paul W. Schleck on Fri, Sep 22 2006 4:09 pm
writes:
Paul W. Schleck on Thurs, Sep 21 2006 12:21 pm
writes:

Why did you - repeat you - bring up the late Lloyd
Bentsen at all? Did Lloyd Bentsen have an amateur
radio license? :-)

Heck, Leonard, it should put you at ease. You don't have one either.

Good grief! Did you have to query QRZ on that one, too?

Robesin did.

They are birds of a feather, Brian.

They might share a brain...

At least Heil didn't consume time and resources in a useless exercise
as Robesin has.

I will dispute that. Very little of Heil's messaging in
here appears useful...except to him. It is almost
entirely about demeaning lots of others. He only makes
nice-nice to other pro-coders.

The only difference
between them is better literacy in Heil's postings. But,
the same hatred of losing anything and bluffmanship
is evident in both.

I see a lot more difference between them than that, but without getting
into a great big ****ing match with either of them, I'll sum it up in
that one of them should be kept away from society, the other is merely
annoying and needs to stick to meaningful exchanges on the air, such as
"you're 59."

Har! Yes, good old "you are 5-9-9!" :-)

...even if a repeat is requested on half of what the
other station transmitted. :-)

Heil is fixated on his one-cannot-possibly-talk-about-
getting-into-amateur-radio until one is already in
amateur radio. [the "chicken and the egg" arrived
at the same time logic...]

Now the FCC does NOT require any commissioner or staffer
to hold an amateur radio license grant in order to
REGULATE US amateur radio. Heil's concept of who rules
is faulty.

They tend to ignore facts.

"Tend?" Hell, no, they OUTRIGHT ignore them.

Heil often expresses disdain and contempt for anyone on
the "outside" of amateur radio attempting to "tell radio
amateurs what to do." That is also illogical and faulty
but grounded in extreme emotional territorialism. He
does NOT rule yet pretends to be the ruler in behavior to
others.

The FCC tells Heil "what to do" and Heil has no choice
but to obey...or lose his precious amateur extra class
license. In any discussion with others about a singular
test to ENTER amateur radio, Heil does not play well and
assumes He can tell others what to do...and does not
hesitate to do so with his typical smug arrogance.

That is NOT a good picture to present to the public about
US amateur radio. But, I doubt that Heil cares. Heil
has His and the rest can go do something else. :-(

Doesn't matter if every newcomer sees their antics for the next eight
decades in the archives, they are right, Right, RIGHT and you are
wrong. Proof? W0EX/SK said he wanted to destroy the ARS since he
couldn't have ham radio his way. Like Robeswine's present antics, no
one said a word...

Hypocrisy in action.

However, Hans Brakob told the Robeswine off several times.
Hans is about the oldest tymest ham in this newsgroup, a
morseman, but one who doesn't think the morse code test
is necessary. Hans earned that right.

The key ingredient is always that morse code test. Anyone
against it are always "wrong" but those for it are always
"right"...in the pro-code-test morsemen's definition of
truth, justice, and the morse way.

["signature" omitted due to all the amateur hissy fits
about being a Life Member of a Professional Association]

Dave Heil · September 27th 06, 08:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
From: on Tues, Sep 26 2006 5:30 pm

wrote:
on Sat, Sep 23 2006 7:06 pm
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Paul W. Schleck on Fri, Sep 22 2006 4:09 pm
writes:
Paul W. Schleck on Thurs, Sep 21 2006 12:21 pm
writes:
Why did you - repeat you - bring up the late Lloyd
Bentsen at all? Did Lloyd Bentsen have an amateur
radio license? :-)
Heck, Leonard, it should put you at ease. You don't have one either.
Good grief! Did you have to query QRZ on that one, too?
Robesin did.
They are birds of a feather, Brian.
They might share a brain...

At least Heil didn't consume time and resources in a useless exercise
as Robesin has.

I will dispute that. Very little of Heil's messaging in
here appears useful...except to him. It is almost
entirely about demeaning lots of others. He only makes
nice-nice to other pro-coders.

Wowsers, Len. If we change the bit about "pro-coders" to "no-coders",
it fits you to a T.

The only difference
between them is better literacy in Heil's postings. But,
the same hatred of losing anything and bluffmanship
is evident in both.
I see a lot more difference between them than that, but without getting
into a great big ****ing match with either of them, I'll sum it up in
that one of them should be kept away from society, the other is merely
annoying and needs to stick to meaningful exchanges on the air, such as
"you're 59."

Har! Yes, good old "you are 5-9-9!" :-)

Good old Len. Nobody but a rank greenhorn would issue a statement in
morse like "you are 5-9-9". A phone op wouldn't do it at all.

...even if a repeat is requested on half of what the
other station transmitted. :-)

You didn't get the first half right so I have doubts as to your second
statement. After all, you aren't involved and aren't sitting around
monitoring CW QSOs with your trusty Icom receiver.

["signature" omitted due to all the amateur hissy fits
about being a Life Member of a Professional Association]

That's your story and you may or may not stick to it. I think you've
gotten a little nervous about using the sig in light of your actions.

Dave K8MN

[email protected] · September 27th 06, 08:33 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Tues, Sep 26 2006 5:30 pm

["signature" omitted due to all the amateur hissy fits
about being a Life Member of a Professional Association]

That's your story and you may or may not stick to it. I think you've
gotten a little nervous about using the sig in light of your actions.

So, how are things in the Waffen SS? Jimmie should be
happy You Are On The Job protecting Him...

Have you and Paul had a difficult time on my "personal, non-
professional life" background check? Have you contacted the
Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers yet? I gave
you their address. It's in all the better trade magazines.

I'm not worried. Are you worried that I'm not worried?

Or do you want me to be worried about your being worried
about my not being worried? :-)

So, when are the moderator police going to show up at my
house? I can put on a bigger pot of coffee. Is that a "service"
to the country? Or would you call that a "country crock?"

I think of most of your little endearing messages as a country
crock. Really spreads greasy stuff in here.

As ever, to you, the famous ByteBrothers phrase invoked.

Dave Heil · September 27th 06, 09:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Tues, Sep 26 2006 5:30 pm

["signature" omitted due to all the amateur hissy fits
about being a Life Member of a Professional Association]

That's your story and you may or may not stick to it. I think you've
gotten a little nervous about using the sig in light of your actions.

So, how are things in the Waffen SS?

I haven't the slightest idea, Len. Is it your belief that it is still
in existence?

Jimmie should be
happy You Are On The Job protecting Him...

Remember your recent words where you state that this is a public
bulletin board that anyone may comment on anything? Why Are You Using
Caps To Begin Words? dOES yOUR kEYBOARD hAVE A sTICKY cAPS kEY?

Have you and Paul had a difficult time on my "personal, non-
professional life" background check?

Why no, Len. Much of your "personal, non-professional life" can be
found right on usenet. It is plain for anyone to see.

Have you contacted the
Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers yet?

No, not yet.

I gave
you their address.

Why yes, you did. I'd already found it though. It is on the web site.

It's in all the better trade magazines.

I couldn't find it in "Farm Industry News" or "Guitar Player".

I'm not worried. Are you worried that I'm not worried?

Thou dost protest too much.

So, when are the moderator police going to show up at my
house?

Moderator police? What are you going on about, Leonard?

I can put on a bigger pot of coffee. Is that a "service"
to the country?

What do you think, Len? Is it?

Or would you call that a "country crock?"

I think of most of your little endearing messages as a country
crock. Really spreads greasy stuff in here.

What do you think of your own little endearing messages, Len? What are
they?

As ever, to you, the famous ByteBrothers phrase invoked.

Do you think that violates the IEEE Code of Ethics?

Dave K8MN

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	N9OGL	Policy	89	April 18th 06 06:16 AM
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	N9OGL	General	34	December 21st 05 03:03 AM
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	[email protected]	General	0	December 5th 05 03:22 PM
FCC levies $10,000 fine for unlicensed operation	Mike Terry	Broadcasting	11	January 31st 05 07:43 PM
FCC issues forfeiture order against Jack Gerrittsen, formerly KG6IRO	Splinter	Policy	1	December 14th 04 11:16 PM

Menu

About Us