RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/104886-do-you-think-discussions-repeaters-technical-today-they-were-25-years-ago.html)

Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 3rd 06 11:55 AM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Indy Lambda Ham whined:
Hey Roachdale ****tard, Roger has never been to Dayton. **** UP!


Roachdale?? You must be thinking of KK9D or whatever his call is. Danny boy.
Not me idiot.



Hi Danny Dews all black men!

Second, Woger HAS been to Dayton.


No, Roger has NOT been to Dayton. Nice lisp, faggot.

Are you his boyfriend now??


Looks like *you* want *that* job, faggot.


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 3rd 06 11:57 AM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Indy Lambda Ham wrote:
No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself.


Wrong again jack ass. Not me.


It's the Roachdale Roach! Hi Danny!

Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard.


Yes he has dip****.


No, he hasn't, dumb****.

Did you have your anal beads locked to his during that
time or what?


Looks like you are more familiar with the use of them then anybody.
Contact Markie Morgan, he likes things up his ass also.


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 3rd 06 11:58 AM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Lllloyd DaViEs wrote:
I GAVE ROGER A BLUMPKIN!


Funny, you'd like to suck Roger's "woger."


Mark C. Morgan October 4th 06 01:45 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Lloyd Wikes Boys wrote:
You are repetative


Learn how to spell it first, fatty!


Mark C. Morgan October 4th 06 01:46 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

wrote:
get flsuhed clean up ham radio


Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard?


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 5th 06 02:38 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Billy Smith wrote:
Mark C. Morgan wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote:


an old friend wrote:


Indy Ham wrote:


Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or
4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember....


No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself.



woger has showed at a ham fest I am shocked but sadly what woger realy
needs is euthenizing


Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard.


Still writing IKYABWAI



Still hiding, coward? Your Pee Wee herman impersonation sucks, just
like your sister.


You don't have to imprersonate Pee Wee Herman because


Because you're doing quite well on your own, you utterly clueless
****tard.


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 5th 06 02:41 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Billy Smith wrote:
Mark C. Morgan wrote:

wrote:

get flsuhed clean up ham radio



Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard?


Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass?


No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there.
BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system
to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure
backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a
"sanction," is it?


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 5th 06 02:41 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006 05:46:38 -0700, "Mark C. Morgan"
wrote:


stfu you know im a child molestor woger


You sure are, Marqueer!


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 6th 06 12:39 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

Billy Smith wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Mark C. Morgan wrote:


wrote:


get flsuhed clean up ham radio


Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard?


Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass?



No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there.
BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system
to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure
backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a
"sanction," is it?


I've been a ham for years lies and misinformation, what else can you expect from silly Billy


Liar. You don't even have the beginner's training wheel no code tech
license. You couldn't pass any of the tests or the code. The FCC can
retest anybody under the VE system. what part of that can't you
understand, stupid? The FCC has the authority, pursuant to
§97.519(d)(2) of the rules to readminister any examination element
previously administered by a volunteer examiner.


Not Cocksucker Lloyd October 6th 06 12:40 PM

Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
 

wrote:

get

Get to dying of yourAIDS, you child molesting son of a bitch!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com