| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago, or today might you hear things like: "I woke up this morning with a pimple on my butt" or "The dog crapped on the living room carpet again." Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. Amateur Radio, a National resource. 73 SC |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Slow Code wrote:
Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago Absolutely not. Back in the 70s we would discuss antennas, circuitry, the pros and cons of certain radios, cars, boats, guns, and such. Occasionally we would discuss more esoteric things like philosophy and history (conspiracy theories were always a favorite). We kept away from politics and religion, mostly, except we would discuss them in general terms. Come to think of it, HF was the same. These days, it's hardly worth turning the radio on most of the time. Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. That might be an oversimplification but it's generally accurate. Like I said earlier, what we obtain too cheaply we do not value highly. Amateur Radio, a National resource. Too many of us forget that if we weren't a resource we would be legislated out of existence. |
slow code staking torl on the lose
|
KB9RQZ Says Learning Code is EASY!
Message-ID: .com
KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy" There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy! Quoted Word For Word! Steve, K4YZ |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
SC wrote in
ink.net: On 19 Sep 2006 20:35:22 -0700, wrote: Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.rad io.amateur.misc Date: 19 Sep 2006 20:35:22 -0700 NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.110.125.19 What's an older guy like you still doing on night shift at the Marshall Space Flight Center? Does NASA have a policy about misuse of government computers? query: whois 131.110.125.19 answer: OrgName: National Aeronautics and Space Administration OrgID: NASA Address: IS05/Office of the Chief Information Officer City: MSFC StateProv: AL PostalCode: 35812 Country: US NetRange: 131.110.0.0 - 131.110.255.255 CIDR: 131.110.0.0/16 - Path: !news.alt.net!usenet - From: SC - Message-ID: . net ROFLMAO, yah right. Don't ya just love Altopia. SC |
slow kook on the loose
Slow Code wrote: slow kook on the loose |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical todayas they were 25 Years ago?
Slow Code you're an idiot, because only an idiot would contine to post
this sort of crap over and over on multiple groups... No code licensing has done nothing to hurt CW or other license classes, and certainly hasn't turned Ham radio into Children's Band, at least where I live (or have lived over the past 40 years or so) I don't know where you live, but where I live, the conversations are at least as techincal on 2 meterss as they were before (even 25 years back), and maybe even more so. Given your agenda on polluting the newsgroups (and probably bands too, if you actually do get on the ham bands) with this crap that supposes than anyone that doesn't do 20+wpm code is not a ham, or other similar pretenses, I doubt if you actually are even active on the bands... (bigots rarely are, in my experience). Yep, we talk about a lot of very technical topics, not the least of which occur on 2 meters, and on local nets, or offline on other frequencies during the day (and heave3n forbid, we actually use telephones too!, and with others outside of our area. The future of ham radio in the Hawaiian islands is likely to be relatively bright, even without an increase in CW. CW is not only the slowest method of communicating, it also is the oldest. Why don't you look into some of the relatively recent advances in the hobby, which most of us have at least evaluated and determined whether we wish to participate, rather than the continual baiting and other crap you post on the groups? By the way, I can't recall seeing you post an actual call sign, just a "slow code" moniker, so how would any of us really know you are one of us anyway? Even if you are, your'e clearly one that should have been outed many years ago. Despite the feeling I'm doing nothing more than feeding a troll, I feel it's time to see if you're actually real... IF SO, please reply to my email address (not on the groups, you've polluted them enough already) and we can hopefully entertain an intelligent conversation. Thanks --Rick AH7H (notice I'm not hiding behind a false email address or ashamed to indicate my true identity!) Slow Code wrote: Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago, or today might you hear things like: "I woke up this morning with a pimple on my butt" or "The dog crapped on the living room carpet again." Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. Amateur Radio, a National resource. 73 SC |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical todayas they were 25 Years ago?
Slow Code you're an idiot, because only an idiot would contine to post
this sort of crap over and over on multiple groups... No code licensing has done nothing to hurt CW or other license classes, and certainly hasn't turned Ham radio into Children's Band, at least where I live (or have lived over the past 40 years or so) I don't know where you live, but where I live, the conversations are at least as techincal on 2 meterss as they were before (even 25 years back), and maybe even more so. Given your agenda on polluting the newsgroups (and probably bands too, if you actually do get on the ham bands) with this crap that supposes than anyone that doesn't do 20+wpm code is not a ham, or other similar pretenses, I doubt if you actually are even active on the bands... (bigots rarely are, in my experience). Yep, we talk about a lot of very technical topics, not the least of which occur on 2 meters, and on local nets, or offline on other frequencies during the day (and heave3n forbid, we actually use telephones too!, and with others outside of our area. The future of ham radio in the Hawaiian islands is likely to be relatively bright, even without an increase in CW. CW is not only the slowest method of communicating, it also is the oldest. Why don't you look into some of the relatively recent advances in the hobby, which most of us have at least evaluated and determined whether we wish to participate, rather than the continual baiting and other crap you post on the groups? By the way, I can't recall seeing you post an actual call sign, just a "slow code" moniker, so how would any of us really know you are one of us anyway? Even if you are, your'e clearly one that should have been outed many years ago. Despite the feeling I'm doing nothing more than feeding a troll, I feel it's time to see if you're actually real... IF SO, please reply to my email address (not on the groups, you've polluted them enough already) and we can hopefully entertain an intelligent conversation. Thanks --Rick AH7H (notice I'm not hiding behind a false email address or ashamed to indicate my true identity!) Slow Code wrote: Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago, or today might you hear things like: "I woke up this morning with a pimple on my butt" or "The dog crapped on the living room carpet again." Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. Amateur Radio, a National resource. 73 SC |
show-na-to-va (that is the greeting for this time of year as a JEW rendered phonicticaly)
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:58:20 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago, or today might you hear things like: I'd guess this varies from location to location but: Probably the topic most often heard here is digital... Interfacing, coordinating IPs, hooking the system into the Internet, configuring operating systems, and getting some one's station to work in the system. Lots of discussions on antennas which is pretty much the same as years gone by. RACES "I woke up this morning with a pimple on my butt" or I'm on my way to the airport (that'd be me) "The dog crapped on the living room carpet again." We have cats, one of which is bigger than some dogs and I've seen him tackle a black lab about five times his size and win. They don't crap on the carpet, but do tend to barf up the mouse they caught which is particularly nice when you are just sitting down to breakfast. Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. On average, I think the technical discussions go deeper now than when I first got on. OTOH people are people. When driving we comment on traffic. When hung over we tend to ... well...never mind.:-)) So topics other than the technical ones are pretty much the same whether now or then. Amateur Radio, a National resource. 73 SC Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Rick Frazier wrote in news:4514E511.8030908
@rickfrazier.com: Slow Code you're an idiot, because only an idiot would contine to post this sort of crap over and over on multiple groups... No code licensing has done nothing to hurt CW or other license classes, and certainly hasn't turned Ham radio into Children's Band, at least where I live (or have lived over the past 40 years or so) I don't know where you live, but where I live, the conversations are at least as techincal on 2 meterss as they were before (even 25 years back), and maybe even more so. Given your agenda on polluting the newsgroups (and probably bands too, if you actually do get on the ham bands) with this crap that supposes than anyone that doesn't do 20+wpm code is not a ham, or other similar pretenses, I doubt if you actually are even active on the bands... (bigots rarely are, in my experience). Yep, we talk about a lot of very technical topics, not the least of which occur on 2 meters, and on local nets, or offline on other frequencies during the day (and heave3n forbid, we actually use telephones too!, and with others outside of our area. The future of ham radio in the Hawaiian islands is likely to be relatively bright, even without an increase in CW. CW is not only the slowest method of communicating, it also is the oldest. Why don't you look into some of the relatively recent advances in the hobby, which most of us have at least evaluated and determined whether we wish to participate, rather than the continual baiting and other crap you post on the groups? By the way, I can't recall seeing you post an actual call sign, just a "slow code" moniker, so how would any of us really know you are one of us anyway? Even if you are, your'e clearly one that should have been outed many years ago. Despite the feeling I'm doing nothing more than feeding a troll, I feel it's time to see if you're actually real... IF SO, please reply to my email address (not on the groups, you've polluted them enough already) and we can hopefully entertain an intelligent conversation. Thanks --Rick AH7H (notice I'm not hiding behind a false email address or ashamed to indicate my true identity!) Slow Code wrote: Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago, or today might you hear things like: "I woke up this morning with a pimple on my butt" or "The dog crapped on the living room carpet again." Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. Amateur Radio, a National resource. 73 SC Sorry you feel that way. These will Help: Step 1: No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all elements required for their license class. Step 2: The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%. Step 3: Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. Step 4: Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. 73 de Slow Code |
KB9RQZ Says Learning Code is EASY!
|
show-na-to-va (that is the greeting for this time of year from a JEW registered pedophile, MARK C. MORGAN)
|
show-na-to-va
do You have *any* idea aT all how laughable you sound,
Roger, accuSing someone eLse about the filth they post????? neverMind, with all the voices running around in your head, i can ansWer my own question. That being, *no* Roger, you have no idea whatSOever how stupid you sound. wrote in message oups.com... morkins only talks technical about dicks and mens assholes. |
show-na-to-va
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Repeaters are **** now. They have so many beeps and boops... tell you the
time, temperature, your signal, DVR recordings.. hell, I hear some even tell you where Woger is hiding at any given moment based on the anal implant provided by the aliens! wrote in message ups.com... Slow Code wrote: Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago Absolutely not. Back in the 70s we would discuss antennas, circuitry, the pros and cons of certain radios, cars, boats, guns, and such. Occasionally we would discuss more esoteric things like philosophy and history (conspiracy theories were always a favorite). We kept away from politics and religion, mostly, except we would discuss them in general terms. Come to think of it, HF was the same. These days, it's hardly worth turning the radio on most of the time. Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. That might be an oversimplification but it's generally accurate. Like I said earlier, what we obtain too cheaply we do not value highly. Amateur Radio, a National resource. Too many of us forget that if we weren't a resource we would be legislated out of existence. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Indy Ham wrote: Repeaters are **** now. They have so many beeps and boops... tell you the time, temperature, your signal, DVR recordings.. hell, I hear some even tell you where Woger is hiding at any given moment based on the anal implant provided by the aliens! Yes, he's hiding his penis in your mouth right now, according to the satellite feed. |
show-na-to-va
|
woger the wabbit hops
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or
4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember.... |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Indy Ham wrote: Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or 4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember.... woger has showed at a ham fest I am shocked but sadly what woger realy needs is euthenizing |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
an old friend wrote: Indy Ham wrote: Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or 4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember.... No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself. woger has showed at a ham fest I am shocked but sadly what woger realy needs is euthenizing Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Indy Ham wrote: Not only did he Hey Roachdale ****tard, Roger has never been to Dayton. **** UP! "Billy Smith" wrote in message ink.net... Indy Ham wrote: Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or 4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember.... Mwhahahahahahha. That would have been a sight to see watching him cowering as someone was ready to rain down some justice on his ****ty little world. He's been nothing but a whiny little boy for years and it wouldn't surprise me that he ran and cowered. You mean like how you cowered and ****ed yourself when Oris stopped by, Billy? |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Hey Roachdale ****tard, Roger has never been to Dayton. **** UP!
Roachdale?? You must be thinking of KK9D or whatever his call is. Danny boy. Not me idiot. Second, Woger HAS been to Dayton. Are you his boyfriend now?? Do you hold his hand and walk with him everywhere he goes fag?? |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself.
Wrong again jack ass. Not me. Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard. Yes he has dip****. Did you have your anal beads locked to his during that time or what? |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Slow Code wrote: Think Back, Are todays conversations on 2 meters as technical as they were 25 years ago, or today might you hear things like: "I woke up this morning with a pimple on my butt" or "The dog crapped on the living room carpet again." Allowing no-codes on VHF & UHF has made discussions less technical and more like CB. Don't let your hatred of CW destroy our HF bands too. Amateur Radio, a National resource. 73 SC SC......Lets jack together on ATV. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
"Indy Ham" wrote in message ... No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself. Wrong again jack ass. Not me. Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard. Yes he has dip****. Did you have your anal beads locked to his during that time or what? I GAVE ROGER A BLUMPKIN! |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Indy Lambda Ham whined: what did the cops do? Nothing... Hey fatass, you are a loser! |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Indy Lambda Ham whined: Hey Roachdale ****tard, Roger has never been to Dayton. **** UP! Roachdale?? You must be thinking of KK9D or whatever his call is. Danny boy. Not me idiot. Hi Danny Dews all black men! Second, Woger HAS been to Dayton. No, Roger has NOT been to Dayton. Nice lisp, faggot. Are you his boyfriend now?? Looks like *you* want *that* job, faggot. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Indy Lambda Ham wrote: No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself. Wrong again jack ass. Not me. It's the Roachdale Roach! Hi Danny! Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard. Yes he has dip****. No, he hasn't, dumb****. Did you have your anal beads locked to his during that time or what? Looks like you are more familiar with the use of them then anybody. Contact Markie Morgan, he likes things up his ass also. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Lllloyd DaViEs wrote: I GAVE ROGER A BLUMPKIN! Funny, you'd like to suck Roger's "woger." |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Lloyd Wikes Boys wrote: You are repetative Learn how to spell it first, fatty! |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Billy Smith wrote: Mark C. Morgan wrote: Billy Smith wrote: Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote: an old friend wrote: Indy Ham wrote: Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or 4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember.... No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself. woger has showed at a ham fest I am shocked but sadly what woger realy needs is euthenizing Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard. Still writing IKYABWAI Still hiding, coward? Your Pee Wee herman impersonation sucks, just like your sister. You don't have to imprersonate Pee Wee Herman because Because you're doing quite well on your own, you utterly clueless ****tard. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Billy Smith wrote: Mark C. Morgan wrote: wrote: get flsuhed clean up ham radio Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard? Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass? No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there. BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a "sanction," is it? |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
|
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
Billy Smith wrote: Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: Billy Smith wrote: Mark C. Morgan wrote: wrote: get flsuhed clean up ham radio Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard? Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass? No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there. BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a "sanction," is it? I've been a ham for years lies and misinformation, what else can you expect from silly Billy Liar. You don't even have the beginner's training wheel no code tech license. You couldn't pass any of the tests or the code. The FCC can retest anybody under the VE system. what part of that can't you understand, stupid? The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to readminister any examination element previously administered by a volunteer examiner. |
Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com