Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Leroy" wrote in message
news ![]() I was under the impression that CW would get through under worse conditions and/or with lower power requirements than other modes. Various digital modes do better under low SNR conditions than CW, but they do require a computer at both ends to perform the encoding and decoding -- some people don't like that fact, that you seemingly need "more equipment" to work such modes than you do with CW. It's a bit of a red herring, however, in that these days pretty much every single amateur radio being sold commercially has a processor (computer) in it anyway, and while some are strictly for "control" (not modulation/demodulation), the percentage that does have raw number crunching power increases every day, and within a decade it's a fair bet that over 90% of all commerical amateur radios will use DSP techniques for modulation and demodulation. (Cell phone went to DSPs somewhere between 5-10 years ago now...) Does no one run "flea power" anymore? Absolutely they do, and it's a really cool part of the hobby... but for every 100 amateurs, I would guess that the number running QRP on a regular basis is about 1. ---Joel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proposal 4 (US Hams) | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 20 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |