| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scott" wrote in message .. . I haven't really been following this thread, so I'll assume it originated by someone who thinks the code requirement (here in the USA) should be removed from the license requirements. Personally, I don't think it needs to be removed because with a little practice, anyone can do 5 WPM. In fact, I recall a young man of about 5 years old getting his license many years ago...it used to be written up in one of the chapters of the ARRL handbook. If you don't want to learn code, we have the Technician class license for that. Anyhow, where in the rules does it say a ham is required to know code to possibly save a life one day? It's just something they came up with to use in testing for a license. [snip] Personally I happen to believe it should be kept simply because it is one of the basics of ham radio. Even if one never uses it after, it should be learned at a basic (i.e. 5wpm) level. This later enables the individual to later decide if they want to pursue it to a higher level. If they are not required to learn the basic level, they may forever falsely believe that code is too hard for them. Dee, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Has morse code saved any lives recently? | Antenna | |||
| FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | Shortwave | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||