wrote:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 23:20:48 -0500, "Titties n Beer" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:27:14 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:



Stop telling others how to quote.

not till you follow the basic convention

YOU have NO ROOM to talk about "convention", FATBOY! Not when you
randomly change "definitions" to fit your lies.

You have no room to criticize.

sure I have plenty of room

With a belly like that all you have to do is one 360 degree turn
and you make all the room you need, I suppose.

Steve, K4YZ

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
egroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get
their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the
internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same
thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced
Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to
read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like
Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license.

SC

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
legroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get
their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the
internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same
thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced
Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to
read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like
Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license.

SC

Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most
don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your ilk.
And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a CB'er with HF
privileges will move next door to you.

Cry me a river, Sissy-Boi.

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
glegroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They
get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on
the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do
the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced
Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier
to read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you
like Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham
license.

SC

Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most
don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your
ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a
CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you.


ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF.

SC

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
oglegroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They
get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on
the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do
the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced
Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier
to read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you
like Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham
license.

SC

Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most
don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your
ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a
CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you.


ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF.

SC

Yes, I am hilarious. Sad part is that you are too dense to pick up on the
nuances of what I wrote, but then that's typical of you.

Believe me SC, even Mark is above your level of intelligence, spelling
included. You are WAY out of your league attempting to debate me. Sure, call
me a ****-ant. BFD. Again, and as I have previously informed you, no one,
including the FCC, ARRL, _______ ---name your group here, give a rat's ass
what you think. Send mail/email to whomever you wish. They'll soon file your
garbage in the circular file where it properly belongs.

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code
wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
ooglegroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They
get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on
the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do
the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced
Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF
bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it
easier to read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you
like Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham
license.

SC

Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason
most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk
to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better.
Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you.


ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF.

SC

Yes, I am hilarious. Sad part is that you are too dense to pick up on
the nuances of what I wrote, but then that's typical of you.


No, I caught the nuance. You'll be the one wishing things went my way
once the bands are rendered useless by less qualified operators. Listen
to eleven meters if you want to know what ham radio is going to sound
like.

SC

wrote in :

On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:45:35 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code
wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
news:1162691564.978502.304120@f16g2000cwb .googlegroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark.
They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show
up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW,
they'll do the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code
licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF
bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it
easier to read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were
you like Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham
license.

SC

Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason
most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk
to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better.
Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you.


ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF.

SC

Yes, I am hilarious. Sad part is that you are too dense to pick up on
the nuances of what I wrote, but then that's typical of you.


No, I caught the nuance.
not like ly
You'll be the one wishing things went my way
once the bands are rendered useless by less qualified operators.
like yourself
Listen
to eleven meters if you want to know what ham radio is going to sound
like.

sounds like an imporvement on what is every sat night and most other
nights

SC
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Shut the hell up, no one was talking to you.

SC