"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code
wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
ooglegroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They
get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on
the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do
the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced
Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF
bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.
don't you knowsc?

Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it
easier to read. :-)


Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you
like Mark and rode the short bus to school?

That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham
license.

SC

Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason
most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk
to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better.
Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you.


ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF.

SC

Yes, I am hilarious. Sad part is that you are too dense to pick up on
the nuances of what I wrote, but then that's typical of you.


No, I caught the nuance. You'll be the one wishing things went my way
once the bands are rendered useless by less qualified operators. Listen
to eleven meters if you want to know what ham radio is going to sound
like.

SC