| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
December 6th 06, 05:48 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
cyber vandal at work
|
|
#2
December 6th 06, 06:08 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
cyber vandal at work
KC4UAI wrote: wrote: Modern technology grants the Federal Communications Commission the electronic know-how to pin-point through high-tech equipment the location of any operational radio transmitter and this means the FCC know about Todd and agrees he is most likely with the rules It may mean that they haven't noticed, or have yet to take action. the origainator of the this claims to have spent months informing the FCC of todd actions If one takes Todd's claims of being a pirate at face value, it's most likely that they just haven't noticed yet. sory they have to have noticed him |
|
#3
December 8th 06, 04:13 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
cyber vandal at work
an_old_friend wrote: KC4UAI wrote: wrote: Modern technology grants the Federal Communications Commission the electronic know-how to pin-point through high-tech equipment the location of any operational radio transmitter and this means the FCC know about Todd and agrees he is most likely with the rules It may mean that they haven't noticed, or have yet to take action. the origainator of the this claims to have spent months informing the FCC of todd actions If one takes Todd's claims of being a pirate at face value, it's most likely that they just haven't noticed yet. sory they have to have noticed him They would need to "notice" the transmission in progress, but getting complaints would very likely get him on the list of things to listen for so you may be right... But, not hearing a knock on the door does not mean the FCC is agreeing that the activity is legal. Sorta like K1MAN's pending renewal application... Given enough time, they will take care of it, if it doesn't go away on it's own.... |
|
#4
December 8th 06, 04:26 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
cyber vandal at work
KC4UAI wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KC4UAI wrote: wrote: Modern technology grants the Federal Communications Commission the electronic know-how to pin-point through high-tech equipment the location of any operational radio transmitter and this means the FCC know about Todd and agrees he is most likely with the rules It may mean that they haven't noticed, or have yet to take action. the origainator of the this claims to have spent months informing the FCC of todd actions If one takes Todd's claims of being a pirate at face value, it's most likely that they just haven't noticed yet. sory they have to have noticed him They would need to "notice" the transmission in progress, but getting complaints would very likely get him on the list of things to listen for so you may be right... But, not hearing a knock on the door does not mean the FCC is agreeing that the activity is legal. Sorta like K1MAN's pending renewal application... Given enough time, they will take care of it, if it doesn't go away on it's own.... The problem is though, The monitoring station is in chicago, which I'm 300 miles away from, and my signal can't be heard up there. Secondly hearing it and it being legal is another issue. The station is located on 13.556.00 MHz LSB and 6.950 MHZ AM and anyone that knows propergation knows that those bands skip, even Part 15 on those bands can skip very good. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO |
|
#5
December 8th 06, 04:29 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
A QRZ Trivia Question That Smegma Radio May FInd Educational
KC4UAI wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KC4UAI wrote: wrote: Modern technology grants the Federal Communications Commission the electronic know-how to pin-point through high-tech equipment the location of any operational radio transmitter and this means the FCC know about Todd and agrees he is most likely with the rules It may mean that they haven't noticed, or have yet to take action. the origainator of the this claims to have spent months informing the FCC of todd actions If one takes Todd's claims of being a pirate at face value, it's most likely that they just haven't noticed yet. sory they have to have noticed him They would need to "notice" the transmission in progress, but getting complaints would very likely get him on the list of things to listen for so you may be right... But, not hearing a knock on the door does not mean the FCC is agreeing that the activity is legal. Hello, Robert. Welcome to our little den of iniquity. Expect little...Laugh a lot...take little seriously here and you'll have fun. Morkie's of the opinion that if someone files a complaint or comment that the lack of immediate response means he's justified in doing things illegally. Same for Toiddie (Todd, N9OGL). Toiddie's worse, actually, because he's actually admitted to or made reference to numerous violations of federal law over the years, including illegally modifying ultralight aircraft....The idea that there may be an aircraft over my head that's being operated by a kiddie-porn anime freak give me the willies. Sorta like K1MAN's pending renewal application... Given enough time, they will take care of it, if it doesn't go away on it's own.... They're getting much more robust in their efforts to shut down the "broadcasters" as any perusal of FCC NOV's / NOUO files will reveal. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
| shortwv | Shortwave | |||
| 197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
Hybrid Mode
