|
No More Element 1
K4YZ wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't. Brian, we have to quit trying to make Miccolis admit to doing wrong. Miccolis "never" does wrong. He is a morse-tested amateur extra...ergo, he never has done anything wrong. There really isn't anything new to comment on here or to "address"... And so Robesin posts yet another meaningless post. Welp, at least we weren't treated to excrement eating exploits this time. |
No More Element 1
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 20 Dec 2006 17:36:40 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: There really isn't anything new to comment on here or to "address"...It's the hate-hams against the pro-hams, and that's all that can be said. guess you did not read the thread before you decided to contiue you trashathon Sure I did, fatboy. And LIKE I SAID..."nothing new"... Same ole-same-oh.... Steve, K4YZ Bully Robesin is just making sure that he has the very last word when there's nothing left to be said. Twice. |
No More Element 1
wrote:
wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm wrote: wrote: From: on Sun, Dec 17 2006 3:22 pm an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service. There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just plain wrong. sure there is you have often said Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am aware of. I am not in favor of a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Nor have I ever advocated such. Anyone who says I have is mistaken - in error - just plain wrong. So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't. Brian, we have to quit trying to make admit to doing wrong. What "doing wrong" do you mean, Len? Brian Burke says I came up with a proposal for a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Yet nobody seems to be able to show us that alleged proposal. Brian and Len and Mark aren't the only ones who recall that you came up with the idea. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en It seems that your "proof" isn't proof at all of what you claim. Aren't your skills in creating a Google search up to the task at hand? Dave K8MN |
More Brain Bouncing Blindly
wrote:
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^) They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of 'em. Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you been posting under? As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain? Steve, K4YZ Am I really anonymous? No, Brian, you are not anonymous. Anyone who's been here a year or so will know that. For those short-timers, your call is N 0 I M D (using spaces to make it clearer to the hate-filled near-sighted twits). Major Dud is running out of "reasons" for personally insulting others so he has resorted to his old, false, outdated "SIGNING" charge. A written communications medium such as on Usenet already IDs the user in the header information. Robesin doesn't understand any of that...he still thinks he is in some kind of cue-so on the radio and the "signing" must be the callsign. Poor feller doesn't understand the difference between Usenet over the Internet and amateur radio parlance-protocol-procedure. Sigh...there's no end to the behavior of Robesin in sight and 2007 will open up just another barrage of hate-filled, frustrated insults from Him. Unless he gets a job in another hospital to end his "vacation." :-) Best regards, |
No More Element 1
wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm wrote: wrote: From: on Sun, Dec 17 2006 3:22 pm an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service. There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just plain wrong. sure there is you have often said Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am aware of. I am not in favor of a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Nor have I ever advocated such. Anyone who says I have is mistaken - in error - just plain wrong. So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't. Brian, we have to quit trying to make admit to doing wrong. What "doing wrong" do you mean, Len? Brian Burke says I came up with a proposal for a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Yet nobody seems to be able to show us that alleged proposal. Brian and Len and Mark aren't the only ones who recall that you came up with the idea. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en Yet *none* of you have actually shown the posting where I allegedly did this. Anyone can go into google and delete one of their own postings. That's why I can't find the posting of Dave Heil/K8MN saying that Veteran's always have their hands out. That's because you are mistaken. Four people are mistaken. People sometimes "remember" things that did not happen. Four people "remember" things which did not happen. Bogart never says "Play it again, Sam" in "Casablanca", yet that misquote became so popular that it became the title of another film. "Jim Miccolis/N2EY" will never be the name of any film, but it is likely that "Robesin" will be a thriller. If you could *show* where I supposedly came up with - originated - a proposal for a no-test amateur service, you might be able to prove *me* to be mistaken. But so far you've not been able to do that, even though all my posts are in Google, waiting for you. Sure they are. Under which names have you posted? That's because you are mistaken. Or maybe even trying to deceive. Four people are mistaken. Four people are trying to deceive. And you should get your story straight, too. Is it a "no-test" amateur radio service, or "No Test International"? The claims wander around. So how many names have you posted under? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy Subject: U.S. Morse Code Solution-Maybe? From: "Alun L. Palmer" References: . net .com .com . net .com .com Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09 NNTP-Posting-Host: $$$iwhuaelsd0m.x-privat.org Date: 27 Feb 2005 17:13:18 +0100 Organization: X-Privat NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org Lines: 22 X-Authenticated-User: $$i01yb3xds_84qryemw X-Complaints-To: Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com !news.moat.net!x-privat.org!not-for-mail Dave Heil wrote in news:4221EBFE.2A406BF0 @earthlink.net: bb wrote: Dave Heil wrote: You sound like the kind of guy who'd just open 'er up to any guy who shows any interest at all in amateur radio. No tests. No qualifications. Actually, that would be Jim Miccolis, N2EY. He is the one who proposed "No Test International." Actually, you're just acting silly. Jim made no such proposal. Dave K8MN He did. Of coutse he was being a devil's advocate, but he was indeed the one to suggest this. |
No More Element 1
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm wrote: wrote: From: on Sun, Dec 17 2006 3:22 pm an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service. There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just plain wrong. sure there is you have often said Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am aware of. I am not in favor of a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Nor have I ever advocated such. Anyone who says I have is mistaken - in error - just plain wrong. So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't. Brian, we have to quit trying to make admit to doing wrong. What "doing wrong" do you mean, Len? Brian Burke says I came up with a proposal for a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Yet nobody seems to be able to show us that alleged proposal. Brian and Len and Mark aren't the only ones who recall that you came up with the idea. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en It seems that your "proof" isn't proof at all of what you claim. Aren't your skills in creating a Google search up to the task at hand? Dave K8MN I can't google up something which has been deleted, such as your claim that Veteran's always have their hands out. |
No More Element 1
wrote: On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:08:06 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm wrote: wrote: From: on Sun, Dec 17 2006 3:22 pm an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service. There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just plain wrong. sure there is you have often said Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am aware of. I am not in favor of a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Nor have I ever advocated such. Anyone who says I have is mistaken - in error - just plain wrong. So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't. Brian, we have to quit trying to make admit to doing wrong. What "doing wrong" do you mean, Len? Brian Burke says I came up with a proposal for a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Yet nobody seems to be able to show us that alleged proposal. Brian and Len and Mark aren't the only ones who recall that you came up with the idea. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en It seems that your "proof" isn't proof at all of what you claim. Aren't your skills in creating a Google search up to the task at hand? Dave K8MN there is just too much junk out there like no one can find your own statements on the out of band french men Heil posted the frequencies that he worked the out of band Frenchmen on while he was in Africa. A French visitor to RRAP said that the frequency that Heil was working the Frenchmen on was not a legal privelege for French hams. Anyway, anyone can delete any of their posting through google. For example, I'll delete this one tomorrow /new years day/ to show that it can be done. |
No More Element 1
wrote:
wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm wrote: wrote: From: on Sun, Dec 17 2006 3:22 pm an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service. There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just plain wrong. sure there is you have often said Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am aware of. I am not in favor of a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Nor have I ever advocated such. Anyone who says I have is mistaken - in error - just plain wrong. So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't. Brian, we have to quit trying to make admit to doing wrong. What "doing wrong" do you mean, Len? Brian Burke says I came up with a proposal for a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Yet nobody seems to be able to show us that alleged proposal. Brian and Len and Mark aren't the only ones who recall that you came up with the idea. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en Yet *none* of you have actually shown the posting where I allegedly did this. Anyone can go into google and delete one of their own postings. Perhaps - if the person has a google account. But I have not done that. All my old rrap postings are intact in the archives. And a person cannot delete the postings of another. So if A post something, and A is quoted by B, the quote will still show up in B's posting even if A deletes his post. That's why I can't find the posting of Dave Heil/K8MN saying that Veteran's always have their hands out. How can you be sure? Perhaps you did not correctly remember what was actually written. Your memory of postings here has been proved to be selective and inaccurate. For example, recently you made some significant mistakes in your account of FDR's treatment of veterans during the Great Depression. Shall I repost those mistakes of yours and the corrections? That's because you are mistaken. Four people are mistaken. That is correct. The truth is the truth, regardless of how many deny it. People sometimes "remember" things that did not happen. Four people "remember" things which did not happen. Yep. You're one of them. Deal with it. Bogart never says "Play it again, Sam" in "Casablanca", yet that misquote became so popular that it became the title of another film. If you could *show* where I supposedly came up with - originated - a proposal for a no-test amateur service, you might be able to prove *me* to be mistaken. But so far you've not been able to do that, even though all my posts are in Google, waiting for you. Sure they are. Yes, they are. That's because you are mistaken. Or maybe even trying to deceive. Four people are mistaken. At least that many. Four people are trying to deceive. Maybe. I wrote "maybe even trying to deceive". And you should get your story straight, too. Is it a "no-test" amateur radio service, or "No Test International"? The claims wander around. |
No More Element 1
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com