Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 20th 06, 10:49 PM
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee Flint
This latter one had NO effect on the CW space allocated to
Generals/Advanced.
But of course it has an effect! It just dumped a quarter-million potential new users onto the 75M, 40M, 15M, and 10M CW segments.
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 21st 06, 03:48 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Default Report & Order Posted!

W2DNE wrote:


Dee Flint Wrote:

This latter one had NO effect on the CW space allocated to
Generals/Advanced.


Yes that's quite correct. I was just making a general comment over the effect
that the recent changes have on me. Being a CW ragchewer I'm happy to say that
this new CW band loss won't affect me much since I seldom if ever used that
upper part of the band. It's ironic though that if I had just kept my Novice
license of 50 years ago I could have used it today and my present operation
would be little changed. Course you couldn't keep a Novice license for more than
a year in those days, so that's just wishful thinking...


But of course it has an effect! It just dumped a quarter-million
potential new users onto the 75M, 40M, 15M, and 10M CW segments.


I think allowing all licenses on CW is a good idea. In fact I suggested exactly
such a license change on this very group several years ago. You can guess what
the response was. The population of the CW spectrum has been declining in recent
years. And most of my QSOs are with hams well over 60. My theory is that the
dead CW bands are due mostly to the dead CW hams. So I'm hoping that this change
will help...
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 21st 06, 04:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default Report & Order Posted!


"W2DNE" wrote in message
...

Dee Flint Wrote:

This latter one had NO effect on the CW space allocated to
Generals/Advanced.


But of course it has an effect! It just dumped a quarter-million
potential new users onto the 75M, 40M, 15M, and 10M CW segments.




--
W2DNE


The second R&O did not change the allocated band limits for Generals and
Advanced. The number of users is another story but you know as well as I
do that it won't happen. The Techs will upgrade to General and work the
voice segments instead. Let's welcome those few who do undertake to use CW.

Dee, N8UZE


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Get into the real arena [email protected] Antenna 1 May 13th 05 04:35 PM
FCC BPL Report and Order Stresses Avoidance, Resolution of Harmful Interference Mike Terry Shortwave 0 October 30th 04 05:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1418 ­ October 15, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 October 19th 04 01:35 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1418 ­ October 15, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 October 18th 04 04:51 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 April 30th 04 05:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017