Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... The big question is whether the signals (keyed carrier vs. keyed audio tone) look different on a spectrum analyzer. If they don't, why should FCC care? I agree that it doesn't matter to the FCC as long is the keyed audio tone is coupled to the radio with EM waves such as with light (optoisolators), RF or wires (electrical connections). However, if you couple the keyed audio carrier acoustically, speaker-to-mike using only sound waves, then that is J3E and only permissible in the voice portion of the band. If I were to whistle nearly pure sine waves (I am a good whistler, perhaps you have seen paintings of my mother :-)) in Morse code into the mike input, it might look like CW and sound like CW but it would really be J3E, hence illegal in the CW sub-bands. Using acoustic coupling (J3E), it becomes a slippery slope; first computer generated tones, then human whistling, then humming and before you know it, "talking" (di dah di dah etc.. and finally, "words" :-)) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |