| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
January 17th 07, 03:17 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
People who aren't on RRAP
|
|
#3
January 17th 07, 11:07 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? Why should it bother you that non-hams have a say in the ARS? |
|
#4
January 17th 07, 11:10 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE |
|
#5
January 17th 07, 11:37 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. |
|
#6
January 18th 07, 03:18 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE |
|
#7
January 18th 07, 11:50 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. |
|
#8
January 18th 07, 12:15 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. Dee, N8UZE |
|
#9
January 18th 07, 06:29 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. You are mistaken, Dee. Look at the past history of the "moderators." In the majority they are those favoring morse mode above all other optional-use modes. Your "dissent" has been MINOR with those "expert amateurs." You, as an obvious morseperson, will not be blocked out. It's been the style of the morsemen on this newsgroup to belittle, denigrate, enage in prissy little pedantic diatribes over words that do not fit in the code-tested amateur extra "expertise" opinions on What Is Good For [US] Amateur Radio. To say that such "does not exist" is not only wrong but deliberately hypocritical...if not behaving in atypical ostrich syndrome of hiding heads in sand and refusing to acknowledge reality. Oh, the "moderators" will make all the statements of "we treat everyone fairly" but such are simply political-group LIES (called "spin" in the vernacular). The "moderator" group will simply proceed as they have in the past...giving an overbalanced favoritsm to morsemanship with scant attention (other than lip service) to other optional modes. After all, only the amateur extras Know What Is Good For (THEIR version of) Amateur Radio. Nothing will have changed except the newsgroup title. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. That's an entirely DIFFERENT problem...one that Google just REFUSES to acknowledge or to correct. Live with it. Google refuses to fix the cross-posting problem that has existed for years. Or, in typical ostrich-syndrome elitism, just block them all out. Then they won't exist. For you. LA |
|
#10
January 19th 07, 01:59 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. Dee, N8UZE Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no one seems to mind that. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| People ask me if RRAP had always been full of hams that act like retards. | General | |||
| People ask me if RRAP had always been full of hams that act like retards. | Policy | |||
| Two Kinds of People on RRAP | Policy | |||
| Hey Twist!!!! | CB | |||
| Cherry Hill horse racetrack- Mad Cow Disease Link found | Shortwave | |||
Linear Mode
