| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
January 20th 07, 07:50 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Those Old Study Guides
wrote:
How they compare to the current exams is a matter of opinion. IMHO the old exams covered fewer subjects but covered them in much more detail. That's probably true. So do "we" want new hams to have a broad-shallow knowledge or a narrow-deep knowledge? Do "we" want Swiss Army Knife type hams or quantum electrodynamic photon experts? I suggest the former would be more valuable to the "service". Seems to me that a ham who is a jack-of-all-trades- and-master-of-none would be more valuable to the "service" than one who is ignorant of most trades and master of one. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
| another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
| LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
