LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 21st 07, 09:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Feb 23 is the No-code date


KH6HZ wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:

one how does it serve the interest of the ARS


two how does it serve the interest of the public at large


The ARS is a technical service, alledgedly charged with maintaining a pool
of trained radio operators, to provide emergency communications, advance the
radio art, contribute to international goodwill, and advance their skills in
communications and technical phases of the art.

These purposes are outlined in Section 97.1.

An individual who simply passed the requisite examinations to obtain their
license without studying the underlying electronics/antenna/etc theory does
not meet those goals.


how? in what way?

It is extremely likely that people who pass their examinations using these
methods will not continue to increase their electronics or radio knowledge,
since they didn't take the time to learn any to begin with.


unsupported supotion


I, for one, do not think that the ARS needs a pool of appliance operators.
Granted, to some degree, appliance operations are going to be a "given" in
today's age, since hardly any amateurs build their own gear any longer.


Opinoin unsuported by facts


However, if you're looking for a radio service devoid of any technical
knowledge, there are many others that fit that bill available to
individuals.


and now you enage in making assertions as to the motives of the man
that questions you

I say answer the questions of how your proposal support the interest of
the ARS, and the public

you are the one that want to change things

I am more or less atified that the current written tests are acceptable
and slowly improving thus I see no need to change

you do suport your asertion

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? robert casey Policy 115 January 9th 07 12:28 PM
another place the fruit can't post MarQueerMyDear Policy 2 November 21st 06 05:22 AM
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 Harry Marnell Scanner 0 May 15th 04 01:56 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine General 206 January 6th 04 01:12 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017