Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KH6HZ" wrote in
: "Mike Coslo" wrote: Up for a challenge? Memorize the Extra test, all 800 some questions in the pool. Then let's take a test. I'll give you the test question number, and you give me the letter answer. Since memorization presumably has nothing to do with the knowledge, this should be easy as the new applicants have in taking the so called dumbed down tests That isn't how memorization works. I was waiting for someone to fall into that one. Of course it isn't how it works. While there may be some people who "memorize" the question and answer, in reality what most people are referring to when they talk about "memorization" is in fact something more akin to "word association" or "familiarity". Here is a intereting note. I have an almost photographic memory. When I studied fot the tests, I would take an on-line test. Any and all questions that I got wron, I hit a book and figured out the correct answer. I read it - usually once, and then I knew the answer. Was I memorizing? All one has to do is read the question pool enough, or drill long enough using a computer program, that they will "recognize" the correct answer when they see it. They don't actually "memorize" the question pool per se, such that they know the answer to question ### is AAA. No, instead, they simply become familiar enough with it that they can recognize the correct answer to the question, much the same way you become familiar with many things in life without actually "memorizing" them. Yeah, Sounds like how mwmory works. I offered that challenge because I hear so much about rote memory. Some of the curmudgeons are correct in that a person who memorizes the pool is a lot dumber than a person who learns it. A lot of Technicians I know used the "Now You're Talking" books. Lots of stuff in there that prepares you for radio operations. When I got my tech license, I used the Gorden West book. That's not how I passed the exams though. Do you think that most new hams get their license, then hire people to put their stations together after they buy their "Yaecomwood" boxes? "putting a station" together these days involves little more than calling HRO, unpacking the boxes UPS delivers, and plugging everything in. Not much theory required there. But it doesn't have to. We have the options of putting out a fair amoount of power, and to experiment, and work with equipment of our oown design and manufacture, and to modify that equipment as long as it stays within whatever legal performance limits as apply. That's what the testing is about. No one is required to make use of all the priveliges. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |