Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KH6HZ" wrote in
: wrote: Seems to me that the rational compromise would be to offer a variety of skills tests. Perhaps. Unfortunately, a skills test requires a greater effort on the part of VEs to implement, test, and grade. It is highly unlikely we would ever see *ANY* suggestion that makes testing "harder" ever implemented by the FCC. Fact is, it is politically incorrect to "fail" people. We will never see the return of a skills test to the ARS. That's the sad reality of the situation. Just a comment about this part of the thread. Once you get away from distinct skills such as Morse code acumen, you get into a grey area. I'm trying to envision a test where one VE wants only plain english and another one thinks it is cool to say things such as QSL, QTH, or HI-HI on voice. So much subjectivity. Operating practices are OUR responsibility to teach the new guys. The idea of having to know it at the time of testing is not entirely realistic. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |