Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
Once you get away from distinct skills such as Morse code acumen, you get into a grey area. I'm trying to envision a test where one VE wants only plain english and another one thinks it is cool to say things such as QSL, QTH, or HI-HI on voice. So much subjectivity. You're right. This is why I do not (currently) support any type of "skills" test. Although I am not opposed to the idea, I cannot think of a way to implement one fairly. Instead, I feel the focus should be on "strengthening" (not read: make more difficult) the theory examinations. 73 KH6HZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |