Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 23, 10:15*pm, Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote oups..com: About 1961, FCC decided to "modernize" the license tests. They were all converted to multiple choice format, with a new answer sheet that could be machine-graded. This transition did not take place overnight, though - the field offices first used up their supply of old tests before going to the new ones.* * * * I'm a little confused here. My 1956 Guide has Multiple choice for the General test and Technician test at that time. Were they wrong? Couple of points: - Before March 21, 1987, the General and Technician used exactly the same written test. The only difference in testing for the two licenses was that General required 13 wpm code and Technician required 5 wpm code. - When the Conditional license existed, it too used the same written test as the General and Technician. - The questions and answers in the Ameco Guide you have were not the actual questions used on the test. They were written by Ameco, and were derived from the essay- type study guides provided by the FCC. - The General/Technician exams in the 1950s were not 100% multiple choice. There were a few draw-a-diagram questions and some show-your-work calculation questions. But the majority of the questions on those exams *were* multiple choice, and the Ameco folks may have thought their Guide to be adequate. -- It is interesting that the Ameco book doesn't cover the Extra exam. In those days (1956), the Advanced was closed to new issues, but folks who held an Advanced could continue to renew and modify as needed. A few hams made the jump from General to Extra, but only a few went for Extra in those years because it gave no additional operating privileges, and the Extra required another trip to an FCC examiner. The Conditional was the by-mail equivalent of the General back then, and if you lived more than 75 miles from an FCC exam point you could get a Conditional. But there was no by-mail option for the Extra. Conditionals made up a sizable percentage of US amateur radio in the 1950s. One source I saw said Conditionals accounted for about 25% of 1950s US hams. In that same period Extras were only about 2%. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |