Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Jan 2007 22:36:44 -0800, "
wrote: On Jan 22, 2:370m, "Bob Brock" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in ... "KC4UAI" wrote: From the same perspective, I think that all hams should be required to re-test on a regular basis to keep their ham license. fterall, that is what they do with driver's licenses isn't it? Can you drive your ham rig on he streets and kill or main others by losing control? That "license comparison" subject was done to death in here years ago. It is presuming that a hobby radio license "is the same as" vehicular operation...it is far from that. The FCC decides. In the case of the Commercial Radiotelephone licenses (three classes merged into one General class) they were made lifetime. NO renewals needed. Ever. [sometime around the 1980s? I'd have to look in my licenses folder elsewhere to get the exact date] The state of the radio art is constantly changing. While not very rapidly in US amateur radio, most of the other radio services have changed drastically. So many changes that the COLEMs would be hard pressed to keep up, certainly so the FCC if they still had to make up the tests. Can the VEC QPC keep up with slowly-changing amateur radio technology? That's doubtful since there has been little change in the written test content for over a decade. LA I wasn't being serious Len. I didn't read here years ago and would be surprised if someone seriously suggested periodic retesting. In my stated, they don't require a written test to renew drivers licenses unless the person has been convicted of a moving violation since the last renewal. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |