| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KH6HZ" wrote in
: "Mike Coslo" wrote: Some people can't help that though. In the end, the difference is not all that much. Memorizing a formula and knowing where to look it up and use it is a functional equivalent. I wouldn't be caught dead without my ARRL handbook. Yes, but what about those who simply word associate the answers and never bother to learn the underlying theory at all? Are they really a benefit to the ARS, other than upping the "body count". Well, there are plenty of people who get through life kinda like that. I don't disagree with you there. I'm all about technical acumen. I just don't think all hams need to be as technically clever as I am, as some hams do. I believe the theory examinations should be structured to test people on basic knowledge and skills -- the building blocks they use to further their journey in ham radio. I do not feel it is unreasonable to expect folks who get licensed to actually 'know' these things. It couldn't, for the many things that we can engage in with this hobby. I doubt we would get many people into the hobby if we had to test to proficiency in all the aspects of it. 70% isn't necessarily "proficient". I would say 70% is adequate for passing the test. I would be hard pressed, for instance, to say an employee who gets 70% of their work correct is proficient at their job. Definitely. But the idea to me is that a Ham who scored 70 percent on the test can still put up an antenna - maybe even correctly, operate a radio, help out in an emergency, and certainly in some cases do some fine CW work. I just think that trying to decide on what exactly makes a "good test" is so subjective. I wouldn't want to base it on what I know. I definitely wouldn't want to base it on "genius Hams" level of knowledge. Others will differ. I would offer this though. From what I know of EE students, at least in my environment, is that they are loaded up with classes. They can't take any of the gut courses. Getting through their courses is a challenge that a fair number take an extra year to do it. Most of them who are not Hams already, graduate with just about the same ability to put a station together as a newly minted General. Who had a test from a public question pool. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
| another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
| LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||