Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert casey wrote in
hlink.net: How about a question like this: "A manufacturer guarantees his crystals to be within .01% of the marked frequency, when used in the recommended circuit at 20 degrees C. The crystals have a negative temperature coefficient of 50 parts per million per degree C. Would you put that question in an Amateur Radio test today? Well, you could. You'd have to pick the correct answer from those offered in the multiple choice. But you could work "backwards" with each choice to find the one that fits right. Sure you could put it in. But as one of a limited number of questions in a test, it falls at the bottom of the relevency scale. There are ways to cheat almost any system. Do you know of any actual cheating under the old system? Oh, there were jokes to the effect that for an extra fee, you were guaranteed to pass... I'd heard a little bit of that kind of stuff too. There have been documented cases of suspected cheating under the VEC system, where the FCC called in hams who then flunked the retest. I imagine that some of those recalled may have passed their retests.... Good, glad they were caught. One of the interesting things about people when they get to be curmudgeons is that they use present day exposures and punishments as some sort of evidence of corruption as compared with the good old days, when there was apparently no corruption because there wasn't any expose's of the wicked. The FCC probably weighed the downsides of a cheater escaping undetected and decided that such a cheater would not degrade the quality or safety of the amateur service that much. Unlike say a cheater "passing" state medical board exams to become a licensed medical doctor. You just have to do enough to limit it to a level that doesn't make testing look like a joke. Agreed. If a cheater were to keep their nose clean and operate properly, they would appear to everyone as just another good ham. Of course, those with a tendency to cheat tend to expose themselves in the end.Probably part of the personality, and general stupidity that cheaters have in common. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |