Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent ofthe average amateur ...)
Dean M wrote:
I would certainly agree with you BUT what his niblets was doing was not being discriminating, far from he. He invited comments then refused to post any of those that he did not approve of. That doesn't meet the definition of "censorship". It is very difficult for a private citizen who is not employed or appointed by the government to engage in "censorship". Editors of newspapers invite letters to the editors and then refuse to publish them. That's not "censorship". QEX invites articles to be submitted and then refuses to publish them after agreeing to publish them. That's not censorship. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
From: Leo on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:03:16 -0500
On 7 Feb 2007 15:29:04 -0800, wrote: On Feb 7, 4:40?pm, Leo wrote: On 7 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0800, wrote: ...nothing but evasive drivel. Entire post skipped! Leo, I think you realized that I have seen through your cunning plan, What cunning plan? HUSH, Leo! The jig is up...we've been FOUND OUT!!! Le Grande Conspiracie has been shot down! Quick, burn all the classified papers, evacuate the Embassy, then execute Plan B! and was not trapped by it. But rather than admit that I have outsmarted you, my post is labeled "evasive drivel" and snipped. Isn't it? Cranky Spanky seems to think he is "Jim Phelps." Little does he know that not only will "the Secretary disavow any knowledge of him" but never knew him in the first place and doesn't have ANY tape that self-destructs in five seconds! :-) cue theme from "Mission Impopsicle" It's a simple question. Your reply or lack of one says much more about you than it does about me. LOL! Leo, I'm debating on whether or not to submit Cranky as an "unforgettable character I've met" article to Readers Digest. I've a hunch that it would be too far-out and be undigestable to the Digest. :-) cue theme from "Moonlight Zone" Bon chance, mon ami, salute, LA |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
"Cecil Moore" wrote:
Sorry, that's not the definition of "censorship". Discrimination is not necessarily censorship. Mark's has defined 'censorship' as having one (or more) of his postings rejected by a moderated newsgroup. Using that same definition, he practices 'censorship' in his own blog site's 'readers comments' area. |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
On 8 Feb 2007 12:03:03 -0800, "
wrote: From: Leo on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:03:16 -0500 On 7 Feb 2007 15:29:04 -0800, wrote: On Feb 7, 4:40?pm, Leo wrote: On 7 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0800, wrote: ...nothing but evasive drivel. Entire post skipped! Leo, I think you realized that I have seen through your cunning plan, What cunning plan? HUSH, Leo! The jig is up...we've been FOUND OUT!!! Le Grande Conspiracie has been shot down! Quick, burn all the classified papers, evacuate the Embassy, then execute Plan B! Egad! He's on to us! Quick, hide! and was not trapped by it. But rather than admit that I have outsmarted you, my post is labeled "evasive drivel" and snipped. Isn't it? Cranky Spanky seems to think he is "Jim Phelps." Little does he know that not only will "the Secretary disavow any knowledge of him" but never knew him in the first place and doesn't have ANY tape that self-destructs in five seconds! :-) cue theme from "Mission Impopsicle" ....for a guy who supposedly made it all the way to a Masters degree, he seems to have a great deal of trouble thinking 'outside the box'. It's sad, in a way..... It's a simple question. Your reply or lack of one says much more about you than it does about me. LOL! Leo, I'm debating on whether or not to submit Cranky as an "unforgettable character I've met" article to Readers Digest. I'm afraid that your article would be returned without the $100 cheque - he's actually quite forgettable.... I've a hunch that it would be too far-out and be undigestable to the Digest. :-) As far out as the Moon, I'll bet - say, how far is that, anyway? I have conflicting figures here from some 'engineer' in this group, who will remain useless..... cue theme from "Moonlight Zone" ....or the theme from 'Trailer Park Boys' Bon chance, mon ami, salute, La guerre, la guerre....tojours la guerre! snappy salute LA 73, Leo |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
From: Leo on Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:35:00 -0500
wrote: From: Leo on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:03:16 -0500 On 7 Feb 2007 15:29:04 -0800, wrote: On Feb 7, 4:40?pm, Leo wrote: On 7 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0800, wrote: Leo, I think you realized that I have seen through your cunning plan, What cunning plan? HUSH, Leo! The jig is up...we've been FOUND OUT!!! Le Grande Conspiracie has been shot down! Quick, burn all the classified papers, evacuate the Embassy, then execute Plan B! Egad! He's on to us! Quick, hide! I can't run...I have to stay and feed my dog Fideaux some Alpeaux dog food... Cranky Spanky seems to think he is "Jim Phelps." Little does he know that not only will "the Secretary disavow any knowledge of him" but never knew him in the first place and doesn't have ANY tape that self-destructs in five seconds! :-) cue theme from "Mission Impopsicle" ...for a guy who supposedly made it all the way to a Masters degree, he seems to have a great deal of trouble thinking 'outside the box'. He hasn't been able to open it yet. Leo, I'm debating on whether or not to submit Cranky as an "unforgettable character I've met" article to Readers Digest. I'm afraid that your article would be returned without the $100 cheque - he's actually quite forgettable.... I agree. :-) I've a hunch that it would be too far-out and be undigestable to the Digest. :-) As far out as the Moon, I'll bet - say, how far is that, anyway? I have conflicting figures here from some 'engineer' in this group, who will remain useless..... Heh heh heh. Moon? A mere quarter-million miles away, but saying that off-hand is classified as an ERROR and MISTAKE to Cranky. He gonna do da Spanky and demand 6-digit absolute numbers or have me taken out and shot for making a MISTAKE! Nah, Cranky no be wrong. Ever. "CB" radio (as all know it today) on 11m was authorized in the USA in 1958. It was in all the electronics trade papers and Regulations of our FCC. In 1958 little Cranky was just beginning to read, but might have reached 13 WPM level in morse code... The ****y pedant is correct in saying CLASS A and CLASS B Citizens Band radio existed prior to 1958 but that was above 400 MHz and never became a market best-seller. The 11m Citizens Band here was CLASS C (radio control, now in our Part 95 regs as "Radio Control Radio Service") and CLASS D (23 channels of radiotelephone, sharing channel 23 with R-C). The old A and B classes of Citizens Band were eliminated several years back (maybe decades, exact date immaterial to normal folks). By the time of regulation changes to "CB" here, the number of channels was expanded to 40. Not that THAT helped since there were at least a million "11m" CB radios in-use here then and more in various world nations. Hardly anything but heterodynes. [at least they were 'hetero', it would be hell if they were 'homodynes'...:-) ] Heil on the break-in: "You aren't funny, Leonard!" :-) cue theme from "Moonlight Zone" ...or the theme from 'Trailer Park Boys' Theme from "Clockwork Yellow"? "2007: A Code Oddity"? Bon chance, mon ami, salute, La guerre, la guerre....tojours la guerre! snappy salute Oui. Always the WORD WAR 3 bitter fight waged by morsemen... Well, after feeding Fideaux with Alpeaux I might have a pizza with peppereaunix...? As I eat that I'll read biographies of Guglielmeaux Marconeaunix and Phileaux Farnsworth. Leonardeaux |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
On 8 Feb 2007 16:27:11 -0800, "
wrote: From: Leo on Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:35:00 -0500 wrote: From: Leo on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:03:16 -0500 On 7 Feb 2007 15:29:04 -0800, wrote: On Feb 7, 4:40?pm, Leo wrote: On 7 Feb 2007 03:25:23 -0800, wrote: Leo, I think you realized that I have seen through your cunning plan, What cunning plan? HUSH, Leo! The jig is up...we've been FOUND OUT!!! Le Grande Conspiracie has been shot down! Quick, burn all the classified papers, evacuate the Embassy, then execute Plan B! Egad! He's on to us! Quick, hide! I can't run...I have to stay and feed my dog Fideaux some Alpeaux dog food... Cranky Spanky seems to think he is "Jim Phelps." Little does he know that not only will "the Secretary disavow any knowledge of him" but never knew him in the first place and doesn't have ANY tape that self-destructs in five seconds! :-) cue theme from "Mission Impopsicle" ...for a guy who supposedly made it all the way to a Masters degree, he seems to have a great deal of trouble thinking 'outside the box'. He hasn't been able to open it yet. I believe that you're right! Leo, I'm debating on whether or not to submit Cranky as an "unforgettable character I've met" article to Readers Digest. I'm afraid that your article would be returned without the $100 cheque - he's actually quite forgettable.... I agree. :-) Thought you might! I've a hunch that it would be too far-out and be undigestable to the Digest. :-) As far out as the Moon, I'll bet - say, how far is that, anyway? I have conflicting figures here from some 'engineer' in this group, who will remain useless..... Heh heh heh. Moon? A mere quarter-million miles away, but saying that off-hand is classified as an ERROR and MISTAKE to Cranky. He gonna do da Spanky and demand 6-digit absolute numbers or have me taken out and shot for making a MISTAKE! If we're lucky, he won't recalculate that by himself. It took weeks to wash the crap out of the newsgroup after he did that the first time! Nah, Cranky no be wrong. Ever. "CB" radio (as all know it today) on 11m was authorized in the USA in 1958. It was in all the electronics trade papers and Regulations of our FCC. In 1958 little Cranky was just beginning to read, but might have reached 13 WPM level in morse code... A stellar accomplishment, by any measure, that! The ****y pedant is correct in saying CLASS A and CLASS B Citizens Band radio existed prior to 1958 but that was above 400 MHz and never became a market best-seller. The 11m Citizens Band here was CLASS C (radio control, now in our Part 95 regs as "Radio Control Radio Service") and CLASS D (23 channels of radiotelephone, sharing channel 23 with R-C). The old A and B classes of Citizens Band were eliminated several years back (maybe decades, exact date immaterial to normal folks). By the time of regulation changes to "CB" here, the number of channels was expanded to 40. Not that THAT helped since there were at least a million "11m" CB radios in-use here then and more in various world nations. Hardly anything but heterodynes. [at least they were 'hetero', it would be hell if they were 'homodynes'...:-) ] The A and B classes dies a horrible death because - they were'nt useable by the target audience. Sure, there were transceivers available for 450 MHz in 1945 - but they would have cost big bucks, and been massive beasts as well. (as Ptoooey so aptly points out, there were handheld units available for these frequencies in the '50's, but they would have required King Kong's hand to hold them! And King Kon's wallet to buy them, as well.....) . But, because there was a regulation in place that said "Citizen's Band" (regardless of whether it was usable by the "citizens' without exorbuiant expense and superhuman effort), then CB must have existed in 1945. What an idiot! This guy is proof that you shouldn't sign your organ donor card without reading it very carefully - looks like they came for his brain a few years early! Heil on the break-in: "You aren't funny, Leonard!" I'd suggest taking his word as Gospel on that subject - Dave is an expert on the subject of "not funny". But, on the plus side, he can sign his organ donor card any time. I do find it unusual that the US Diplomatic Corpse did not require that particular characteristic from their employees! You'd think that that would be a prerequisite..... :-) cue theme from "Moonlight Zone" ...or the theme from 'Trailer Park Boys' Theme from "Clockwork Yellow"? "2007: A Code Oddity"? That works too! Bon chance, mon ami, salute, La guerre, la guerre....tojours la guerre! snappy salute Oui. Always the WORD WAR 3 bitter fight waged by morsemen... Well, after feeding Fideaux with Alpeaux I might have a pizza with peppereaunix...? As I eat that I'll read biographies of Guglielmeaux Marconeaunix and Phileaux Farnsworth. Leonardeaux au revoir pour maintenant, mon ami - voyez-vous bientôt ! 73, Leoaux (?) |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
On Feb 8, 5:35�pm, Leo wrote:
As far out as the Moon, I'll bet - say, how far is that, anyway? About 250,000 miles. Varies because the orbit is not a perfect circle. *I have conflicting figures here from some 'engineer' in this group, who will remain useless..... Who is that, Leo? |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Quantity Over Quality (Was: Unwritten policy and the intent of the average amateur ...)
On Feb 8, 8:40�pm, Leo wrote:
On 8 Feb 2007 17:35:24 -0800, wrote: On Feb 8, 5:35?pm, Leo wrote: As far out as the Moon, I'll bet - say, how far is that, anyway? About 250,000 miles. Varies because the orbit is not a perfect circle. * * * * have conflicting figures here from some 'engineer' in this group, who will remain useless..... Who is that, Leo? That was you. No, it wasn't. You are mistaken, Leo. I have posted the approximate distance from the earth to the moon here a few times. 250,000 miles, each time. Ptoooey - did you forget? * Ptoooey? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|