wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?

Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?

I've never seen you, looking or not. You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.

Dave K8MN

On Feb 2, 6:24�am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? *I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. *There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. *I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? *Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. *You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?
Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?

I've never seen you, looking or not. *You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. *You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. *

Dave,

It's a safe bet that there will be no evidence presented to back up
that "contesting isn't DXing" claim by "hot-ham-and-cheese".

That's because he just doesn't *do* that. He makes inaccurate claims
that somebody wrote something, but when challenged, does not provide
any quotes or other objective evidence.

For example, he has claimed that I misstated the distance from the
earth to the moon here. That's not true, but he won't admit it.

I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.

You are mistaken, Dave. It's not about producing evidence or proving
the merit of his statements.

It's about "hot-ham-and-cheese" getting attention.

73 de Jim, N2EY

btw: Short Ribs, slow cooked. One pot mild, one pot spicy.

wrote:

That's because he just doesn't *do* that. He makes inaccurate claims
that somebody wrote something, but when challenged, does not provide
any quotes or other objective evidence.

Several posters believe that making snide, one-line "snippets" make them
witty, while they sit behind their keyboard laughing at their own genius.

Naturally, it ****es them off to no end that soon, with the moderated
newsgroup, they will no longer have that ability.

Perhaps if they actually conversed in a dialogue, they'd get some enjoyment
from this aspect of ham radio. However, I suspect that their real
involvement with ham radio consists of little more than what they contribute
to this forum -- nothing.

73
kh6hz

On Feb 2, 8:03 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
That's because he just doesn't *do* that. He makes inaccurate claims
that somebody wrote something, but when challenged, does not provide
any quotes or other objective evidence.

Several posters believe that making snide, one-line "snippets" make them
witty, while they sit behind their keyboard laughing at their own genius.

I think that collecting callsigns makes on witty...

Naturally, it ****es them off to no end that soon, with the moderated
newsgroup, they will no longer have that ability.

Until it was brought to the attention of Riley Hollingsworth...

Perhaps if they actually conversed in a dialogue, they'd get some enjoyment
from this aspect of ham radio.

Perhaps if he actually did something in amateur radio rather than just
using up public resources...

However, I suspect that their real
involvement with ham radio consists of little more than what they contribute
to this forum -- nothing.

73
kh6hz

Sounds a lot like "Mad Dog" Mike Deignan of the RF Commandos.

On Feb 2, 6:24 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?
Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?

I've never seen you, looking or not. You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.

Dave K8MN

You're free to post prickish remarks, yet I'm not free to do the
same?

You're also free to produce and post anything from the archives that
would show that I am wrong. Thanks.

wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:24 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?
Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?
I've never seen you, looking or not. You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.

Dave K8MN

You're free to post prickish remarks, yet I'm not free to do the
same?

I posted no such remark.

You're also free to produce and post anything from the archives that
would show that I am wrong. Thanks.

You want me to produce something I didn't write in order to prove that I
didn't write it? Is that about it?

Dave K8MN

On Feb 3, 12:20 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:24 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?
Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?
I've never seen you, looking or not. You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.

Dave K8MN

You're free to post prickish remarks, yet I'm not free to do the
same?

I posted no such remark.

You're also free to produce and post anything from the archives that
would show that I am wrong. Thanks.

You want me to produce something I didn't write in order to prove that I
didn't write it? Is that about it?

Dave K8MN- Hide quoted text -

Marvy!

wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:20 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:24 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?
Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?
I've never seen you, looking or not. You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.
Dave K8MN
You're free to post prickish remarks, yet I'm not free to do the
same?
I posted no such remark.

You're also free to produce and post anything from the archives that
would show that I am wrong. Thanks.
You want me to produce something I didn't write in order to prove that I
didn't write it? Is that about it?


Marvy!

We can only guess what that word is supposed to convey. Would you like
me to repeat the questions or do you simply choose to ignore them?

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
You want me to produce something I didn't write in order to prove that I
didn't write it? Is that about it?

Proving a negative assertion is virtually impossible.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
You want me to produce something I didn't write in order to prove that
I didn't write it? Is that about it?

Proving a negative assertion is virtually impossible.

That's my belief. I'm still waiting for a response other than "Marvy".

Dave K8MN