On Feb 15, 3:15 pm, "
wrote:
From: The Big-8 Management Board on Thu, 15 Feb 2007
15:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Thurs, Feb 15 2007 7:17 am

This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of the
moderated Usenet newsgroup, rec.radio.amateur.moderated.

Note: "Discussion" is defined herein as 'Doing What We Say.'
i wish that instruction on voting would just be given then we vote and
see what the big is finaly going to do

On Feb 15, 12:48�pm, "an_old_friend" wrote:
On Feb 15, 3:15 pm, "
wrote: From: The Big-8 Management Board on Thu, 15 Feb 2007
15:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Thurs, Feb 15 2007 7:17 am

This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of the
moderated Usenet newsgroup,rec.radio.amateur.moderated.

* *Note: *"Discussion" is defined herein as 'Doing What We Say.'

i wish that instruction on voting would just be given then we vote and
see what the big is finaly going to do

I doubt that "we" are going to get to vote on anything. Only those
who consider themselves to be "eligible" are allowed to "vote."

LA

wrote:

I doubt that "we" are going to get to vote on anything. Only those
who consider themselves to be "eligible" are allowed to "vote."

Of course, you could always post your support, or lack thereof, in
news.groups.proposals.

However, as is evidenced by your behaviour here for the past decade, I doubt
you could "behave" yourself long enough to construct a concise statement of
approval/disappoval which would pass the muster of the moderators of
news.groups.proposals.

On Feb 15, 4:05�pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
I doubt that "we" are going to get to vote on anything. *Only those
who consider themselves to be "eligible" are allowed to "vote."

Of course, you could always post your support, or lack thereof, in
news.groups.proposals.

Tsk, tsk...you didn't look far enough...it is there also.


However, as is evidenced by your behaviour here for the past decade, I doubt
you could "behave" yourself long enough to construct a concise statement of
approval/disappoval which would pass the muster of the moderators of
news.groups.proposals.

Not being of the UK, I don't have a "behaviour."

But, "admonishment" from someone who had FAKE HAWAIIAN
RESIDENCY and a dozen FAKE "clubs" with trusteeship
calls for same, your "admonishment" is ten kinds of
HYPOCRISY. Tsk, tsk.

What you "doubt" is of no concern to me. You have been
ever so critical of my viewpoints for years. Why stop to
consider anything if your mindset is set in concrete? :-)

You might consider that the FCC announced (on 15 Dec 06)
that 06-178 would ELIMINATE code testing for ALL U.S.
amateur radio licenses. That is only about 7 days away.
My advocacy has always been to eliminate that code test.
Can you put two and two together and get the 100%-
correct 4?

Go QRT little man.

LA

On Feb 15, 7:05 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
I doubt that "we" are going to get to vote on anything. Only those
who consider themselves to be "eligible" are allowed to "vote."

Of course, you could always post your support, or lack thereof, in
news.groups.proposals.

However, as is evidenced by your behaviour here for the past decade, I doubt
you could "behave" yourself long enough to construct a concise statement of
approval/disappoval which would pass the muster of the moderators of
news.groups.proposals.

I disapprove of individual amateurs collecting a bunch of club
callsigns.

wrote:

I disapprove of individual amateurs collecting a bunch of club
callsigns.

Nobody really cares about your approval, or lack thereof.

"KH6HZ" wrote in message
...
wrote:

I disapprove of individual amateurs collecting a bunch of club
callsigns.

Nobody really cares about your approval, or lack thereof.

(as if it makes a difference what HH&C thinks...)

On Feb 15, 5:40?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
I disapprove of individual amateurs collecting a bunch of club
callsigns.

Nobody really cares about your approval, or lack thereof.

Nobody seems to care for a call thief, either.

Aloha,
LA

sputtered and stammered:

Nobody seems to care for a call thief, either.

I'll always have 1 more amateur radio license than you, Len!

On Feb 15, 8:40 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
I disapprove of individual amateurs collecting a bunch of club
callsigns.

Nobody really cares about your approval, or lack thereof.

Welp, Riley came around to my way of thinking, so I don't care that
you don't care...