Say, Len.....
 

Say, Len.....
 

On Feb 26, 6:11�pm, wrote:
wrote:
...
* *Oh, my, JS, you've been listening to CB traffic on I-5 again,
* *ain'tcha? *:-)

* *Got two old, ancient CBs but no "leen-yar," the old mobile
* *whips (two) are in the garage. *Got no farther in "truckin"
* *since 1954 and a military vehicle "license" to drive a 3/4-ton
* *and 2 1/2-ton truck. *:-)

* *But, there's truckin' and then there's "truckin." *When the
* *Johnson Viking was in my '53 Austin-Healey sports car,
* *THAT was "truckin." *Once in a while I turned the radio on,
* *too... *:-)

* *Catch ya on the flipflop,
* *Threes, LA

Len:

Mercy sakes alive, get the Austin-Healey back and fired up with the
Johnson Viking and a 8 ft. whip, I'll stick a an old Gonset 11m tube
rig on my Harley with a 4 ft. helical wound fiberglass antenna and it
looks like we'll have ourselves a convoy!

Don't worry about the leen-yar, if I drive on yer bumper there'll be
no problem ... but do have a couple of 300 watt motorola 2-30mhz
xistor amps here ... I don't think the alternator on the harley will
run the amp though, I'll probably have to ride yer bumper. *evil
grin

No joy, JS. The Austin-Healey got traded in on the unwise
demands of a lady who got very attached to me back in '61.
It DID work surprisingly well with a base-loaded shorty whip.
The A-H had an all-aluminum body with great conductivity
in body panel seams. Mobile-wise, a 20-mile shoot was clear
and distinct with the puny 3 W of AMed RF, even with some
QRM. The single-conversion receiver (direct to 455 KHz, not
good) didn't like close-in signals like on the 101 and would
cross-modulate anyone within 10 car lengths on the freeway.

Threes, LA

It all comes down to this ...
 

It all comes down to this ...
 

wrote:

On 26 Feb 2007 08:02:21 -0800, wrote:


KC8GXW-Jim wrote:


...
And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?

I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to
your imbecilic question.

However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for
him, sorry ...


pease feel free to interevene betyween me and some of my "admiriers"
anytime JS

JS

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

smooch smooch, you guys are so gay

It all comes down to this ...
 

wrote:

On Feb 26, 3:46 pm, "
wrote:

On Feb 26, 2:35?pm, wrote:


wrote:

...
i would not buy one of those either
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

How about a used newsgroup from 'em? ?This one seems available, I
believe they are attempting to be done with it.

Should we make 'em a cheap offer? ?grin

On second thought, I would trust Hans Brakob and Phil Kane
for a fair shake. I've agreed and disagree with both in here
and doubt there is the terrible enmity as demonstrated by
Miccolis, Heil, and Kelly in public.

Need I mention that "consulting moderator" Phil Kane
is a communications attorney? On Billings from him
I might need to hire a CPA but on other matters, none.
:-)

LA


Ya know, my mamma had a sayin', "Birds of a feather flock together."

After havin' takin' a good look at that flockin' group, I think there
was wisdom in her words ...

Regards,
JS

you flock birds?

It all comes down to this ...
 

On Feb 26, 8:28 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:14:30 -0500, KC8GXW-Jim
wrote:





wrote:

On 26 Feb 2007 08:02:21 -0800, wrote:

KC8GXW-Jim wrote:

...
And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?

I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to
your imbecilic question.

However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for
him, sorry ...

pease feel free to interevene betyween me and some of my "admiriers"
anytime JS

JS

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

smooch smooch, you guys are so gay

funny how it is k for everyone else to make sexual remark but I can't
even just stae plainly I am bihttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's delicious watching some of you squirm a little. You rewrite the
book on idiocy every day. Have phun.

Say, Len.....
 

wrote:
On Feb 26, 3:02?pm, "
wrote:

.....did you forget?

Back in September of 2006, you wrote a post to
rec.radio.amateur.policy that can be seen at:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en

In that post, you were asked:

"What is the end-goal of your continuing participation here?"

And you replied:

"It is as I've stated many years ago, "to advocate
the elimination of the manual morse code test in US
amateur radio licensing. When that elimination happens, I will leave
this newsgroup." "

In case you missed it, the manual Morse Code
test for a US amateur radio license has been
eliminated completely back on Feb 23, 2007.

Yet here it is several days later and you have are
still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were
going to leave, but you're still here.

Why?

That's an easy one, Jim. Len's claim of only being here to eliminate
Morse Code testing in amateur radio licensing was a falsehood as
evidenced by his posts over better than a decade. It follows that his
claim that he'd leave after the elimination of Morse testing was also false.

He has decided to go on with peculiar tales of some mythical "Church of
St. Hiram" and the goofy idea of mounting a low frequency loop antenna
horizontally when mounted near (in terms of wavelength) to the ground.

Dave K8MN

It all comes down to this ...
 

On Feb 26, 9:59 pm, wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 20:30:06 -0800, "Steven"





wrote:
On Feb 26, 8:28 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:14:30 -0500, KC8GXW-Jim
wrote:

wrote:

On 26 Feb 2007 08:02:21 -0800, wrote:

KC8GXW-Jim wrote:

...
And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?

I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to
your imbecilic question.

However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for
him, sorry ...

pease feel free to interevene betyween me and some of my "admiriers"
anytime JS

JS

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

smooch smooch, you guys are so gay

funny how it is k for everyone else to make sexual remark but I can't
even just stae plainly I am bihttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's delicious watching some of you squirm a little.

squirm? where ?I was just making an observation of your hypocracy

You steal dictionaries regularly because you drool too much.

Say, Len.....
 

On 26 Feb 2007 15:40:36 -0800, "
wrote:

On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote:
wrote:

snip

Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis.....

Complainer - yes. Moderator - no.

He had a chance to sign up as a moderator on the new RRAM newsgroup -
but his name is conspicuously absent from the list.

Guess he prefers that others do the heavy lifting for him..... :)

snip

LA

73, Leo

Say, Len.....
 

On Feb 27, 2:10�pm, Leo wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 15:40:36 -0800, "

wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote:
wrote:

snip

* Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis.....

Complainer - yes. *Moderator - no.

He had a chance to sign up as a moderator on the new RRAM newsgroup -
but his name is conspicuously absent from the list.

Guess he prefers that others do the heavy lifting for him..... :)

Self-defined royalty ARE that way... :-)

73, LA