| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
It all comes down to this ...
Would you buy a used car from these men?
Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Bob Diepenbrock, KC4UAI Jack Cook, VK2CJC Jim Hampton, AA2QA Ace Ratliff, WH2T Jeff Angus, WA6FWI Hans Brakob, K0HB Bill Horne, W1AC Mike Coslo, KB3EIA Personally, I'd decline. JS |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 3:20 pm, John Smith I wrote:
Would you buy a used car from these men? Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Bob Diepenbrock, KC4UAI Jack Cook, VK2CJC Jim Hampton, AA2QA Ace Ratliff, WH2T Jeff Angus, WA6FWI Hans Brakob, K0HB Bill Horne, W1AC Mike Coslo, KB3EIA Personally, I'd decline. JS I'm looking for a Chrysler minivan. |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 3:20?pm, John Smith I wrote:
Would you buy a used car from these men? I would from all the ones I know. Probably from the others as well. WK3C, too - isn't he on the list? Jim, N2EY |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 5:09 pm, wrote:
On Feb 25, 3:20?pm, John Smith I wrote: Would you buy a used car from these men? I would from all the ones I know. Probably from the others as well. WK3C, too - isn't he on the list? Jim, N2EY Yanno, that question, "Would you buy a used car from this man?" got kicked off in the 1970's, I believe. My first acquaintance with that question was when it was on a t-shirt with the image of "Richard Milhouse Nixon" above that question. I suppose there are quite a few people still left around which would purchase a car from old "tricky dick." Maybe mostly his cohorts, friends, partners and other random fools. Of course tricky dick made another statement rather famous, "The people what to know if their president is a crook or not ..." (paraphrased here) But of course, as history has proven--he was ... JS |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote:
I would from all the ones I know. Probably from the others as well. Can't say I've ever had a problem w/ any of those folks either, although I'm sure at one point or another I've disagreed with one (or all) of them on some issue. |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:
... what do this hav to do with radio? It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur bands. It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours also, I mean, who wants to split hairs. JS |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:46:19 -0500, KC8GXW-Jim wrote: wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:20:57 -0800, John Smith I wrote: Would you buy a used car from these men? Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Bob Diepenbrock, KC4UAI Jack Cook, VK2CJC Jim Hampton, AA2QA Ace Ratliff, WH2T Jeff Angus, WA6FWI Hans Brakob, K0HB Bill Horne, W1AC Mike Coslo, KB3EIA Personally, I'd decline. some of them certainly not butI expect RRAM to look say rec.radio.eme in a few weeks JS http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ what do this hav to do with radio? they are the mods of a new radio related NG thus Id say it has something to do with radio But that is a different NG; it has nothing to do with this NG and is off topic. kb9rqz and len anderson are often off topic, thus they support a fellow troublemaker (John Smith) when he posts off topic. |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 7:22 pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
... But that is a different NG; it has nothing to do with this NG and is off topic. kb9rqz and len anderson are often off topic, thus they support a fellow troublemaker (John Smith) when he posts off topic. Any post which mentions any newsgroup(s) and/or moderator(s) of such newsgroups who might influence POLICY for their own benefit, wants, and desires and need to be watched is RIGHT ON TOPIC in my humble opinion ... The british viewed out forefathers as "troublemakers", Martin Luther King was viewed as a troublemaker, Caesar Chavez was viewed as a troublemaker, Ghandi was viewed as a troublemaker, those ending child labor were viewed a troublemakers--yanno, the term "troublemaker" just does NOT offend me in the least, indeed, I'll take that as a complement. JS |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote in message s.com... On Feb 25, 7:22 pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: ... But that is a different NG; it has nothing to do with this NG and is off topic. kb9rqz and len anderson are often off topic, thus they support a fellow troublemaker (John Smith) when he posts off topic. Any post which mentions any newsgroup(s) and/or moderator(s) of such newsgroups who might influence POLICY for their own benefit, wants, and desires and need to be watched is RIGHT ON TOPIC in my humble opinion ... The british viewed out forefathers as "troublemakers", Martin Luther King was viewed as a troublemaker, Caesar Chavez was viewed as a troublemaker, Ghandi was viewed as a troublemaker, those ending child labor were viewed a troublemakers--yanno, the term "troublemaker" just does NOT offend me in the least, indeed, I'll take that as a complement. The thread you started was an unprovoked, ad nominem attack on several good people, not all of whom I have always agreed with but all of whom demand a lot more respect than your and your buddies do, based on your (mis) behaviour on this NG. |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 8:05 pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
... The thread you started was an unprovoked, ad nominem attack on several good people, not all of whom I have always agreed with but all of whom demand a lot more respect than your and your buddies do, based on your (mis) behaviour on this NG. It is my understanding that "public figures" (and, public newsgroup moderators) are not granted the same expectation of privacy as common everyday joes. Indeed, the position they seek to place themselves in, where they can affect common/everyday joes, demands they have no such consideration. Public figures are meant to be watched, criticized, and their motives examined in microscopic detail. Their character, caliber, actions, speech, etc. is wide open to review and re-review. They are open to dress and redress by the public who they wish to serve. Such is democratic republic. Such responsibility they willing accept when they attempt to gain a position of influence ... If they wish to be unknown hermits, that demands another course be followed ... JS |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote:
... WK3C, too - isn't he on the list? Jim, N2EY WK3C? I'd rather suspect he dislikes the arrl more than I, he should ... http://home.ptd.net/~wk3c/ However, this may be more a "falling out of thieves among thieves..", who knows till the final paragraph is written. JS |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:20:57 -0800, John Smith I wrote: Would you buy a used car from these men? Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Bob Diepenbrock, KC4UAI Jack Cook, VK2CJC Jim Hampton, AA2QA Ace Ratliff, WH2T Jeff Angus, WA6FWI Hans Brakob, K0HB Bill Horne, W1AC Mike Coslo, KB3EIA Personally, I'd decline. some of them certainly not butI expect RRAM to look say rec.radio.eme in a few weeks why are you tlaking to yourself forger http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote in message ... On 25 Feb 2007 21:32:17 -0800, wrote: wrote: ... WK3C, too - isn't he on the list? Jim, N2EY WK3C? I'd rather suspect he dislikes the arrl more than I, he should ... he should but does not seem to read NCI's home page http://home.ptd.net/~wk3c/ However, this may be more a "falling out of thieves among thieves..", who knows till the final paragraph is written. JS http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ JS http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com why are you tlaking to yourself forger http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote: ... what do this hav to do with radio? It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur bands. It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours also, I mean, who wants to split hairs. JS why are you tlaking to yourself forger http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
It all comes down to this ...
|
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 26, 7:51 am, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:
wrote: On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote: ... what do this hav to do with radio? It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur bands. It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours also, I mean, who wants to split hairs. JS And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another imbecilic answer. i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you answer with your unthought out da remark?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
It all comes down to this ...
KC8GXW-Jim wrote:
... And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another imbecilic answer. i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you answer with your unthought out da remark? I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to your imbecilic question. However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for him, sorry ... JS |
It all comes down to this ...
From: on Sun, Feb 25 2007 7:40 pm
On Feb 25, 7:22 pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: ... But that is a different NG; it has nothing to do with this NG and is off topic. kb9rqz and len anderson are often off topic, thus they support a fellow troublemaker (John Smith) when he posts off topic. Any post which mentions any newsgroup(s) and/or moderator(s) of such newsgroups who might influence POLICY for their own benefit, wants, and desires and need to be watched is RIGHT ON TOPIC in my humble opinion ... This "Wolfe" is one of the ultra-conservative in a hobby activity who desires the status-quo abnormally much. They abhor CHANGE as some equivalent work of the devil. Naturally They will classify ANY change as "making trouble." There IS something to be said in favor of such non-change conservatism. Considering the state of the art in all electronics (including "radio") is in constant evolution, it is difficult to keep up with it...that takes time away from playing with their radios. Or, it may be a "survival trait" in that sticking with the KNOWN is comforting and gives the illusion of security; i.e., "tribal safety." Or, it may be just plain EGO demanding that others do as the conservatives do it...because they "know what is best for amateur radio." :-) The british viewed out forefathers as "troublemakers", Martin Luther King was viewed as a troublemaker, Caesar Chavez was viewed as a troublemaker, Ghandi was viewed as a troublemaker, those ending child labor were viewed a troublemakers--yanno, the term "troublemaker" just does NOT offend me in the least, indeed, I'll take that as a complement. I'll take as both compliment and "complement.' :-) 'Complement' because there are OTHER valid conditions that exist besides those of the uber-conservative. BTW, Martin Luther (probable namesake of Rev. King) was one of the more ardent "troublemakers" to the Catholic church of his time. The established Catholic clergy of that time were far from perfect and the church itself was forced to reform (and to re-form) itself. In a way, the above is what is happening to the Church of St. Hiram in the holy city of Newington. The elders of that sect are being dragged (kicking a screaming in protest) into the 21st Century of radio hobby-dom. Ciao, LA |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 3:02?pm, "
wrote: ......did you forget? Back in September of 2006, you wrote a post to rec.radio.amateur.policy that can be seen at: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en In that post, you were asked: "What is the end-goal of your continuing participation here?" And you replied: "It is as I've stated many years ago, "to advocate the elimination of the manual morse code test in US amateur radio licensing. When that elimination happens, I will leave this newsgroup." " In case you missed it, the manual Morse Code test for a US amateur radio license has been eliminated completely back on Feb 23, 2007. Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? Jim, N2EY |
It all comes down to this ...
Would you buy a used car from these men? (list snipped) what do this hav to do with radio? Maybe he should have asked if you'd buy a used *radio* from them... :-) |
Say, Len.....
|
It all comes down to this ...
|
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 2:23�pm, John Smith I wrote:
wrote: * ... Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? Jim, N2EY I think Len only remains out of popular demand, I do like to read something of intelligent design now and then, and the dry wit is enjoyable--makes one wonder how many catch on? wink Well, John, it's like this: I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT POSTING IN HERE! :-) In fact, I mentioned that in another thread earlier. Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis seems to be of the belief system that, once some statement is posted, the stater MUST HOLD TO THAT "PROMISE!" ****y pedantry of Miccolis overlooked, there will be more from me in the near future. :-) But, Miccolis is going to do the "Cause Celebre'" with that and spend weeks or months (perhaps years) on some imagined "promise" made by me. Miccolis MUST RULE in here, at least in his mind. Gets annoying but that's how it is with the little people... LA |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 26, 2:35�pm, wrote:
wrote: ... i would not buy one of those either http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ How about a used newsgroup from 'em? *This one seems available, I believe they are attempting to be done with it. Should we make 'em a cheap offer? *grin Why not? They are certainly cheap enough... :-) LA |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 26, 2:35�pm, wrote:
wrote: ... i would not buy one of those either http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ How about a used newsgroup from 'em? *This one seems available, I believe they are attempting to be done with it. Should we make 'em a cheap offer? *grin On second thought, I would trust Hans Brakob and Phil Kane for a fair shake. I've agreed and disagree with both in here and doubt there is the terrible enmity as demonstrated by Miccolis, Heil, and Kelly in public. Need I mention that "consulting moderator" Phil Kane is a communications attorney? On Billings from him I might need to hire a CPA but on other matters, none. :-) LA |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 3:40�pm, "
wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote: ? ... Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? Jim, N2EY I think Len only remains out of popular demand, I do like to read something of intelligent design now and then, and the dry wit is enjoyable--makes one wonder how many catch on? wink * *Well, John, it's like this: *I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT * *POSTING IN HERE! * :-) * *In fact, I mentioned that in another thread earlier. * *Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis seems to be * *of the belief system that, once some statement is * *posted, the stater MUST HOLD TO THAT "PROMISE!" * *****y pedantry of Miccolis overlooked, there will be more * *from me in the near future. *:-) * *But, Miccolis is going to do the "Cause Celebre'" with * *that and spend weeks or months (perhaps years) on * *some imagined "promise" made by me. *Miccolis * *MUST RULE in here, at least in his mind. *Gets * *annoying but that's how it is with the little people... * *LA Let's clarify what I said previously. I would trust Hans Brakob and (consulting moderator) Phil Kane to give a fair shake on things. I've disagreed and agreed with them many a time and there was no real enmity going on. On the other hand, Miccolis, Heil, and Kelly are always displaying enmity towards me in here and have done so for years. LA |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 3:40 pm, "
wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote: ? ... Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? Jim, N2EY I think Len only remains out of popular demand, I do like to read something of intelligent design now and then, and the dry wit is enjoyable--makes one wonder how many catch on? wink Well, John, it's like this: I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT POSTING IN HERE! :-) In fact, I mentioned that in another thread earlier. Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis seems to be of the belief system that, once some statement is posted, the stater MUST HOLD TO THAT "PROMISE!" ****y pedantry of Miccolis overlooked, there will be more from me in the near future. :-) But, Miccolis is going to do the "Cause Celebre'" with that and spend weeks or months (perhaps years) on some imagined "promise" made by me. Miccolis MUST RULE in here, at least in his mind. Gets annoying but that's how it is with the little people... LA Len: You are more than welcome to post in this group, but hell, I am not even "moderately" qualified to offer ya that! Could be worse, ya could have a cb rig with a beeg leenear and heavy bleed over on ten meters ... ever thought about takin' up truckin'? Warmest regards, and a BIG 10-FER GUD BUDDY, 3's! from the golden state, JS |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 26, 3:46 pm, "
wrote: On Feb 26, 2:35?pm, wrote: wrote: ... i would not buy one of those either http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ How about a used newsgroup from 'em? ?This one seems available, I believe they are attempting to be done with it. Should we make 'em a cheap offer? ?grin On second thought, I would trust Hans Brakob and Phil Kane for a fair shake. I've agreed and disagree with both in here and doubt there is the terrible enmity as demonstrated by Miccolis, Heil, and Kelly in public. Need I mention that "consulting moderator" Phil Kane is a communications attorney? On Billings from him I might need to hire a CPA but on other matters, none. :-) LA Ya know, my mamma had a sayin', "Birds of a feather flock together." After havin' takin' a good look at that flockin' group, I think there was wisdom in her words ... Regards, JS |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 4:24�pm, wrote:
On Feb 26, 3:40 pm, " wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote: ? ... Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? Jim, N2EY I think Len only remains out of popular demand, I do like to read something of intelligent design now and then, and the dry wit is enjoyable--makes one wonder how many catch on? wink * *Well, John, it's like this: *I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT * *POSTING IN HERE! * :-) * *In fact, I mentioned that in another thread earlier. * *Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis seems to be * *of the belief system that, once some statement is * *posted, the stater MUST HOLD TO THAT "PROMISE!" * *****y pedantry of Miccolis overlooked, there will be more * *from me in the near future. *:-) * *But, Miccolis is going to do the "Cause Celebre'" with * *that and spend weeks or months (perhaps years) on * *some imagined "promise" made by me. *Miccolis * *MUST RULE in here, at least in his mind. *Gets * *annoying but that's how it is with the little people... * *LA Len: You are more than welcome to post in this group, but hell, I am not even "moderately" qualified to offer ya that! Could be worse, ya could have a cb rig with a beeg leenear and heavy bleed over on ten meters ... ever thought about takin' up truckin'? Warmest regards, and a BIG 10-FER GUD BUDDY, 3's! from the golden state, Oh, my, JS, you've been listening to CB traffic on I-5 again, ain'tcha? :-) Got two old, ancient CBs but no "leen-yar," the old mobile whips (two) are in the garage. Got no farther in "truckin" since 1954 and a military vehicle "license" to drive a 3/4-ton and 2 1/2-ton truck. :-) But, there's truckin' and then there's "truckin." When the Johnson Viking was in my '53 Austin-Healey sports car, THAT was "truckin." Once in a while I turned the radio on, too... :-) Catch ya on the flipflop, Threes, LA |
Say, Len.....
|
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 6:11�pm, wrote:
wrote: ... * *Oh, my, JS, you've been listening to CB traffic on I-5 again, * *ain'tcha? *:-) * *Got two old, ancient CBs but no "leen-yar," the old mobile * *whips (two) are in the garage. *Got no farther in "truckin" * *since 1954 and a military vehicle "license" to drive a 3/4-ton * *and 2 1/2-ton truck. *:-) * *But, there's truckin' and then there's "truckin." *When the * *Johnson Viking was in my '53 Austin-Healey sports car, * *THAT was "truckin." *Once in a while I turned the radio on, * *too... *:-) * *Catch ya on the flipflop, * *Threes, LA Len: Mercy sakes alive, get the Austin-Healey back and fired up with the Johnson Viking and a 8 ft. whip, I'll stick a an old Gonset 11m tube rig on my Harley with a 4 ft. helical wound fiberglass antenna and it looks like we'll have ourselves a convoy! Don't worry about the leen-yar, if I drive on yer bumper there'll be no problem ... but do have a couple of 300 watt motorola 2-30mhz xistor amps here ... I don't think the alternator on the harley will run the amp though, I'll probably have to ride yer bumper. *evil grin No joy, JS. The Austin-Healey got traded in on the unwise demands of a lady who got very attached to me back in '61. It DID work surprisingly well with a base-loaded shorty whip. The A-H had an all-aluminum body with great conductivity in body panel seams. Mobile-wise, a 20-mile shoot was clear and distinct with the puny 3 W of AMed RF, even with some QRM. The single-conversion receiver (direct to 455 KHz, not good) didn't like close-in signals like on the 101 and would cross-modulate anyone within 10 car lengths on the freeway. Threes, LA |
It all comes down to this ...
|
It all comes down to this ...
wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 08:02:21 -0800, wrote: KC8GXW-Jim wrote: ... And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another imbecilic answer. i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you answer with your unthought out da remark? I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to your imbecilic question. However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for him, sorry ... pease feel free to interevene betyween me and some of my "admiriers" anytime JS JS http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ smooch smooch, you guys are so gay |
It all comes down to this ...
wrote:
On Feb 26, 3:46 pm, " wrote: On Feb 26, 2:35?pm, wrote: wrote: ... i would not buy one of those either http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ How about a used newsgroup from 'em? ?This one seems available, I believe they are attempting to be done with it. Should we make 'em a cheap offer? ?grin On second thought, I would trust Hans Brakob and Phil Kane for a fair shake. I've agreed and disagree with both in here and doubt there is the terrible enmity as demonstrated by Miccolis, Heil, and Kelly in public. Need I mention that "consulting moderator" Phil Kane is a communications attorney? On Billings from him I might need to hire a CPA but on other matters, none. :-) LA Ya know, my mamma had a sayin', "Birds of a feather flock together." After havin' takin' a good look at that flockin' group, I think there was wisdom in her words ... Regards, JS you flock birds? |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 26, 8:28 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:14:30 -0500, KC8GXW-Jim wrote: wrote: On 26 Feb 2007 08:02:21 -0800, wrote: KC8GXW-Jim wrote: ... And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another imbecilic answer. i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you answer with your unthought out da remark? I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to your imbecilic question. However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for him, sorry ... pease feel free to interevene betyween me and some of my "admiriers" anytime JS JS http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ smooch smooch, you guys are so gay funny how it is k for everyone else to make sexual remark but I can't even just stae plainly I am bihttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It's delicious watching some of you squirm a little. You rewrite the book on idiocy every day. Have phun. |
Say, Len.....
wrote:
On Feb 26, 3:02?pm, " wrote: .....did you forget? Back in September of 2006, you wrote a post to rec.radio.amateur.policy that can be seen at: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en In that post, you were asked: "What is the end-goal of your continuing participation here?" And you replied: "It is as I've stated many years ago, "to advocate the elimination of the manual morse code test in US amateur radio licensing. When that elimination happens, I will leave this newsgroup." " In case you missed it, the manual Morse Code test for a US amateur radio license has been eliminated completely back on Feb 23, 2007. Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? That's an easy one, Jim. Len's claim of only being here to eliminate Morse Code testing in amateur radio licensing was a falsehood as evidenced by his posts over better than a decade. It follows that his claim that he'd leave after the elimination of Morse testing was also false. He has decided to go on with peculiar tales of some mythical "Church of St. Hiram" and the goofy idea of mounting a low frequency loop antenna horizontally when mounted near (in terms of wavelength) to the ground. Dave K8MN |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 26, 9:59 pm, wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 20:30:06 -0800, "Steven" wrote: On Feb 26, 8:28 pm, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:14:30 -0500, KC8GXW-Jim wrote: wrote: On 26 Feb 2007 08:02:21 -0800, wrote: KC8GXW-Jim wrote: ... And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another imbecilic answer. i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you answer with your unthought out da remark? I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to your imbecilic question. However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for him, sorry ... pease feel free to interevene betyween me and some of my "admiriers" anytime JS JS http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ smooch smooch, you guys are so gay funny how it is k for everyone else to make sexual remark but I can't even just stae plainly I am bihttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It's delicious watching some of you squirm a little. squirm? where ?I was just making an observation of your hypocracy You steal dictionaries regularly because you drool too much. |
Say, Len.....
On 26 Feb 2007 15:40:36 -0800, "
wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote: snip Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis..... Complainer - yes. Moderator - no. He had a chance to sign up as a moderator on the new RRAM newsgroup - but his name is conspicuously absent from the list. Guess he prefers that others do the heavy lifting for him..... :) snip LA 73, Leo |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 27, 2:10�pm, Leo wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007 15:40:36 -0800, " wrote: On Feb 26, 2:23?pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote: snip * Self-styled guru cum "moderator" Miccolis..... Complainer - yes. *Moderator - no. He had a chance to sign up as a moderator on the new RRAM newsgroup - but his name is conspicuously absent from the list. Guess he prefers that others do the heavy lifting for him..... :) Self-defined royalty ARE that way... :-) 73, LA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com