|
just another stalking thread
On Mar 2, 9:34�am, wrote:
On 2 Mar 2007 05:56:31 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Mar 1, 3:25?pm, wrote: * *Why do you write crap like this you do you enage in relentless stalking of a Bisexaul male and expect anyone to believe you are heterosexual? What's a "bisexaul", Morkie? It's not in the dictionary. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
Eight Days...No Lennie...We'll Call Him "The 7UP Man"..."Never Had It, Nevr Will..."
On Mar 2, 12:40�pm, "
further lied and tried to deceive us about his hinted-to Amateur exam with: On Mar 2, 7:32?am, wrote: and BTW mine is not in the that total since it was processed on the 26th by the MERAC VEC * *That would be true, Mark. *The ARRL website Search seems * *to look only through their own VEC's processed records. HUGE Snip. More mindless pontification with which to deceive the weak minded (ie: Morkie, whom, it seems, has taken Lennie's rhetoric hook, line and sinker...) Sigh. Steve, K4YZ |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 2, 9:54�pm, "
wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote: * QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. *7* years, Steve. January 19, 2000. ;-) * *Oh, my, Jimmie Noserve has made that a "holiday" event? Nope. We just keep it out there to remind everyone what a lying dweeb you are, Lennie. Or inept...But does it really matter? * Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. Well, maybe. And maybe not. Time will tell. * *So will William, an arrow, and an apple... * Most liars like him usually are. If he does what he said he'd do back then, he wouldn't be a liar or a no-show, right? Point taken and rightly so. Far be it for Lennie to actually DO what he says he's going to do. * *Something beyond 1930s state of the art, I hope. * *How many KiloWatt rigs has Jimmie Noserve ever * *tuned? More than you, I bet....Mr Rear Area Radio Mechanic. You're not really going to re-hash those lies about passing all that traffic are you, Lennie? You got busted and humiliated then, it will happen again. Why suffer. Just let it lay. * *Has Jimmie Noserve ever tuned up anything beyond * *the 23 cm amateur band frequency? *Anything below * *550 KHz? * *Has Sister Nun of the Above ever sat in the right * *seat and knuckle-spanked a pilot talking on a * *civil airways radio? *On a private sailboat? * *On land during a heavy rainstorm? *On land in * *the desert? Why? You haven't. You're not a pilot, let alone a CFI, so if you're "knuckle- spank(ing)" any pilot you're commiting a federal felony by battering the pilot-in-command of a federally licensed aircraft in flight. You're not qualified to "instruct" ANY person on proper communications techniques. * *How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo * *Tesla got? *AM, FM, or TV? I'm willing to bet tthat whatever it is, it's more than you...By a loooooooooong stretch. What rig should he buy for CASH? * *How about an Icom IC-7800? *Yaesu FT-2000D? * *IC-756PROIII? *FT-DX9000? *Kenwood TS-2000? * *Yaesu FT DX 9000MP? How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?! All of those radios require a federal license to operate other than to just turn on an listen to or admire the blinking lights. You don't have a federal license that allows you to use any of them in the intended manner. (BTW: Please don't waste our time with tales of your "professional" licensure...Your GROL is useless for Amateur applications as it does not grant station privileges or authorize a callsign) What antenna? * *How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic? Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie. * *On a U S Tower HDX-5106MDPL? * *A Bencher Inc. "Skyhawk 3X10"? *A Butternut HF9V? Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness. CC&Rs? * *Gasp! *I have to get one of those?!? *I don't * *have any! *HORRORS! No...You don't. But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that Log periodic on your block. Operating procedures? * *ABSOLUTELY! *By-the-Book Letter-Perfect as it was * *in the 1930s so shall it be today!!! * *Commit just ONE slight infraction and I would be * *EXCOMMUNICATED!!! *Stripped of all licenses and * *radios by Riley H. himself!!! You have to HAVE a license to be stripped of, Lennie. And if you're using "1930's" procedures, you'll sound like an idiot on 21st century Amateur Radio...Which is pretty much what the rst of us (except Morkie, and Morkie's an idiot) expect from you. Vanity call? * **VANITY* CALL?!?!? *Oh, my... * *Can't use "N2EY" or "K4YZ" or "K8MN"...those VANITY * *calls are TAKEN!!! Here's one you can use right now on that Part 15 station you were bragging about a couple of years back: 1PTZ2MNI * *Have to go out to a furniture store to get the RIGHT * *VANITY! Think about it. * *Wow! *So MUCH to think about! *Do you possibly think * *ANYONE could approach your Expertise and Brillian Mind * *about AMATEURISM in radio?!? *Nobody can, ya know...you * *keep laying it onto us so much... A TYPO! LENNIE'S MAD! ONLY MAD MEN NEEDING ANGER MANAGEMENT MAKE TYPOS!....(Or so sayeth Lennie some hundreds of times over...) Eight Days...No Lennie...No surprises there.................. Steve, K4YZ |
More Morkie Mularkie
On Mar 3, 9:34�am, wrote:
On 3 Mar 2007 06:49:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Mar 2, 9:30?am, wrote: On 2 Mar 2007 05:51:38 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Mar 1, wrote: BBBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !*?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! stop whing steve * *Stop WHAT, Fatboy? stop lying There's no lying here, fatboy. You told me to 'stop whing". I asked you what "whing" is... Can you not even read your own spelling, fatboy? Steve, K4YZ |
just another stalking thread
On Mar 3, 9:35�am, wrote:
On 3 Mar 2007 06:50:43 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Mar 2, 9:34?am, wrote: On 2 Mar 2007 05:56:31 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Mar 1, 3:25?pm, wrote: * hy do you write crap like this you do you enage in relentless stalking of a Bisexaul male and expect anyone to believe you are heterosexual? * * What's a "bisexaul", Morkie? learn to spell properly yourself seve Lessee....I figured the ratio of YOUR typos to mine, Morkie and it came out at over 21,000-to-1. Now. WHAT is a "bisexaul", Morkie? It's obviously NOT a "typo" since you keep doing it over and over. Steve, K4YZ |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
"John Smith I" wrote in message ... KH6HZ wrote: "K4YZ" wrote: QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. The testing sites are probably not ADA compliant enough for his wheelchair to make it. Well, yanno, Len could just be a magician, ya never know, ya just never know ... Len usually does what he says and says what he does ... just gotta like a guy like that, yanno what I mean jellybean? JS why do you stalk men steve http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
"K4YZ" wrote in message s.com... On Mar 1, 7:32?pm, " wrote: A vanity license application requires an already-granted amateur radio license. New licensees will take longer to process, both at the ARRL (for ARRL VEC) and at the FCC. An FCC Commissioner could snap his/her fingers and make an application "happen", but it won't ever happen with YOUR name on it... "No Code" has been the law of the land for over a week, now. Any perusal of ULS will show hundreds of people who've taken the test SINCE then are already licensed and have been for days. Other than "I'm too lazy" or "I'm a lying coward", you don't have any excuses. Morkie passed HIS General, Lennie, so it means he's either smarter than you or found yet ANOTHER three VE's that needed $50 more than they needed a conscience. So which is it? Steve, K4YZ Steve, If you think about what ham radio is all about, try to consider a Mr. Len Anderson attempting to conduct a normal QSO. First he would need to develop a modicum of social skills and be able to discuss a reasonably wide range of relevant topics with people that he never met before. Would Len be an interesting person that people would want to QSO with? His relevant topics are limited to the evils of morse code testing (which is now a moot point anyway) and his sense of humor is making one-liners that are not really funny that involve half-wit jokes about engineering terms such as reactance and susceptance. Len knows that. I think Len is horrified over the prospect of an amateur license because it involves social interactions that he is not prepared to participate in. For Len, an amateur license would just be a useless people of paper and an HF of VHF station would be a worthless investment because it involves two way communication. SW |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
If you think about what ham radio is all about, try to consider a Mr. Len Anderson attempting to conduct a normal QSO. First he would need to develop a modicum of social skills and be able to discuss a reasonably wide range of relevant topics with people that he never met before. Would Len be an interesting person that people would want to QSO with? Well, if he is really that way, he could stick to doing contests. Contest QSOs require minimal social contact... "You're 5 by 9 here in NJ, your number is 435". :-) |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
Dee Flint wrote:
... While I do not think much of his social skills, I personally think he is more than intelligent enough. The key issue is really his personal goals and motivations. Dee, N8UZE When push-comes-to-shove, just gotta luv ya dee! :) JS |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
"K4YZ" wrote in message s.com... On Mar 1, 7:32?pm, " wrote: A vanity license application requires an already-granted amateur radio license. New licensees will take longer to process, both at the ARRL (for ARRL VEC) and at the FCC. An FCC Commissioner could snap his/her fingers and make an application "happen", but it won't ever happen with YOUR name on it... "No Code" has been the law of the land for over a week, now. Any perusal of ULS will show hundreds of people who've taken the test SINCE then are already licensed and have been for days. __________________________________________________ _____________ This demonstrates that Len is not up to speed on application handling procedures. The ARRL and the FCC handle NEW applications first, upgrades next, and vanity applications last. This is their operating policy. Afterall some one with an existing license can operate while they wait for the upgrade or vanity call. New license processing normally takes 5 to 10 days. Upgrades also take 5 to 10 days but are done after processing the new licensees. At the ARRL they are processing faster than normal despite the increased number of forms to go through as they put on extra staff in anticipation of this. Vanity calls are special processing and are not handled by the VECs (except for renewals). One must apply directly to the FCC and they take 3 weeks or more. Dee, N8UZE |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
On Mar 3, 3:09�pm, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:02:47 -0500, "Dee Flint" wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message ps.com... On Mar 1, 7:32?pm, " wrote: *A vanity license application requires an already-granted *amateur radio license. New licensees will take longer to *process, both at the ARRL (for ARRL VEC) and at the *FCC. * * An FCC Commissioner could snap his/her fingers and make an application "happen", but it won't ever happen with YOUR name on it... * * "No Code" has been the law of the land for over a week, now. * * Any perusal of ULS will show hundreds of people who've taken the test SINCE then are already licensed and have been for days. _________________________________________________ ______________ This demonstrates that Len is not up to speed on application handling procedures. * dee you are responding Robeson not anderson I do hope she doesn't think I am the SAME as Robesin! The difference is that I DO have documented proof of my military service time...plus a photo essay in public view of what I did during that time...plus a few articles authored for Ham Radio magazine. :-) But, on the issue of ARRL VEC application processing, their recent web page article did NOT say how many applications were received (in numerical quantities), only that they had received applications from many ARRL VE groups. It is easy to name off the number of ARRL VE teams but the article doesn't say (except for some Carribbean team...55-plus?) how many total or per day. shrug 73, LA |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 3, 5:25�am, Leo wrote:
On 2 Mar 2007 19:54:30 -0800, " wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote: * QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. snip * How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo * Tesla got? *AM, FM, or TV? Several thousand hours, at least......all of it right here on RRAP *:) Heh heh heh heh. Well, think of it this way: He isn't causing ANY RFI or EMI by broadcasting on the Internet... :-) Is anyone up there knowledgeable about the Aussie OUTbacker antenna line? I'm curious and there has been some mention of them on the Antennex.com website. 73, LA |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
On Mar 3, 6:20 pm, "
wrote: On Mar 3, 3:09?pm, wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:02:47 -0500, "Dee Flint" wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message ps.com... On Mar 1, 7:32?pm, " wrote: ?A vanity license application requires an already-granted ?amateur radio license. New licensees will take longer to ?process, both at the ARRL (for ARRL VEC) and at the ?FCC. ? ? An FCC Commissioner could snap his/her fingers and make an application "happen", but it won't ever happen with YOUR name on it... ? ? "No Code" has been the law of the land for over a week, now. ? ? Any perusal of ULS will show hundreds of people who've taken the test SINCE then are already licensed and have been for days. _________________________________________________ ______________ This demonstrates that Len is not up to speed on application handling procedures. ? dee you are responding Robeson not anderson I do hope she doesn't think I am the SAME as Robesin! me too that might call for the feild of Honnor and that would rediculous to paraphrase Bill O'Reily The difference is that I DO have documented proof of my military service time...plus a photo essay in public view of what I did during that time...plus a few articles authored for Ham Radio magazine. :-) But, on the issue of ARRL VEC application processing, their recent web page article did NOT say how many applications were received (in numerical quantities), only that they had received applications from many ARRL VE groups. It is easy to name off the number of ARRL VE teams but the article doesn't say (except for some Carribbean team...55-plus?) how many total or per day. indeed shrug 73, LA- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON!
On Mar 3, 3:02�pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message s.com... On Mar 1, 7:32?pm, " This demonstrates that Len is not up to speed on application handling procedures. Not being an amateur licensee NOR a voting member of the ARRL may be at fault...however I've been licensed as a Commercial radio operator for 51 years. In that time there were a LOT of changes of "procedure." The privatization of operator testing was a major change some two decades (give or take) ago...BOTH for amateur and professional license testing. Is "knowledge of application handling" an IMPORTANT bit of amateur radio operator knowledge? I don't think so. The NCVEC doesn't think so. *The ARRL and the FCC handle NEW applications first, upgrades next, and vanity applications last. *This is their operating policy. Is it? :-) I'm not going to rush to the FCC website to check that and I don't care to dispute the League on what they say... Afterall some one with an existing license can operate while they wait for the upgrade or vanity call. NOT LEGALLY if their "existing license" is IN their grace period. Hasn't N2EY reminded you yet? :-) New license processing normally takes 5 to 10 days. According to an ARRL VEC VE team leader, N6ZZK, it takes 10 to 15 days. I've talked to Ted and shaken hands with him, am I to believe you over him? *Upgrades also take 5 to 10 days but are done after processing the new licensees. That depends on surface mail delivery from VE teams to the ARRL VEC in Newington, CT. East coasties will get their mail there the first (usually). West coasties (in CONUS) get there next to last; Alaska and Hawaii are nearly last but the island possessions in the Pacific WILL be last on delivering ARRL VEC paperwork to Newington. *At the ARRL they are processing faster than normal despite the increased number of forms to go through as they put on extra staff in anticipation of this. Just so terribly wonderful, ain't it? :-) I haven't seen any photos at the ARRL website that show sweaty workers spending all kinds of hours a day, no one with dark circles under their eyes from all that "overtime." Vanity calls are special processing and are not handled by the VECs (except for renewals). *One must apply directly to the FCC and they take 3 weeks or more. Tsk, tsk. You forgot to mention that you can't get a Vanity call UNLESS you already have a legal operator license. Rather important thing to remember, that... 73, LA |
Eight Days..."snip"
On Mar 3, 9:57 am, "K4YZ" wrote:
On Mar 2, 12:40?pm, " further lied and tried to deceive us about his hinted-to Amateur exam with: On Mar 2, 7:32?am, wrote: and BTW mine is not in the that total since it was processed on the 26th by the MERAC VEC ? ?That would be true, Mark. ?The ARRL website Search seems ? ?to look only through their own VEC's processed records. HUGE Snip. More mindless pontification with which to deceive the weak minded (ie: Morkie, whom, it seems, has taken Lennie's rhetoric hook, line and sinker...) Sigh. Steve, K4YZ Lot's of sighs from Robesin. Probably oxygen deprivation to that pin- head brain of his. |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On 3 Mar 2007 15:24:14 -0800, "
wrote: On Mar 3, 5:25?am, Leo wrote: On 2 Mar 2007 19:54:30 -0800, " wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote: QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. snip How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo Tesla got? M, FM, or TV? Several thousand hours, at least......all of it right here on RRAP :) Heh heh heh heh. Well, think of it this way: He isn't causing ANY RFI or EMI by broadcasting on the Internet... :-) ...resulting in many,many kW hours left available for better uses (i.e. curling irons, electric toilets and such) :) Is anyone up there knowledgeable about the Aussie OUTbacker antenna line? I'm curious and there has been some mention of them on the Antennex.com website. I've not heard of the OUTbacker until you mentioned it. A quick check of the local ham radio stores (www.radioworld.ca and www.durhamradio.com) showed no listing for this manufacturer, so there probably aren't a lot of them installed up here. Sorry, can't add to the knowledge base on this one - I'll ask around, though! 73, LA 73, Leo |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
Leo wrote:
... Sorry, can't add to the knowledge base on this one - I'll ask around, though! 73, LA 73, Leo http://www.outbackerantennas.com/ JS -- http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 4, 8:42�am, John Smith I wrote:
Leo wrote: * ... Sorry, can't add to the knowledge base on this one - I'll ask around, though! * 73, LA 73, Leo http://www.outbackerantennas.com/ Thanks for pasting the link, JS, you beat me by an hour...:-) Outbacker NA is based in Kentucky and seems to carry all the Aussie verticals of that brand. I'm considering that sort of multi-band antenna for a home station...not that it matters a great deal here since the paths north to east require NVIS type sky-burning. Mobile will probably be 6m-2m-70cm in a triband whip (probably Diamond) with a Diamond motorized hatchback-lip mount that allows lowering it inside the garage. "Stealth antenna" sort of thing...:-) Haven't heard a lot about them "furrin ay-tennas" (like Australia is a "foreign land?") fur dem pickups in da woods of Kain-tuckie. Over on www.antennex they've been described in much detail by Aussie amateurs who thought much of them in Aussie-land outback territory. A curiosity is how to get an effective ground plane for a home installation that does NOT involve sticking a lot of radials into the ground. Sprinkler pipe is all PVC so that will not do. There's no NEC version modeling program that can simulate the row of tall cypresses where the intended location of a vertical would be (in between two of the spaced cypresses). [just planning ahead...] No sweat on a VHF-UHF home antenna...enough vent pipes (metal) to mount them on. For "stealth" I can do the Ventenna thing and cover the vertical VHF-UHF with PVC pipe of large diameter. 73, LA |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 4, 8:56�am, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:36:43 -0500, Leo wrote: On 3 Mar 2007 15:24:14 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 3, 5:25?am, Leo wrote: On 2 Mar 2007 19:54:30 -0800, " wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote: *QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. snip *How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo *Tesla got? M, FM, or TV? Several thousand hours, at least......all of it right here on RRAP :) * Heh heh heh heh. *Well, think of it this way: *He isn't * causing ANY RFI or EMI by broadcasting on the * Internet... *:-) ...resulting in many,many kW hours left available for better uses (i.e. curling irons, electric toilets and such) *:) * Is anyone up there knowledgeable about the Aussie * OUTbacker antenna line? *I'm curious and there has been * some mention of them on the Antennex.com website. missed this I do know that a friend of aquired one some years ago *and was quite happey with it I think I have seen that *AES has it most folks I know that have seen it sopined that the price to benifit ratio might be lacking but my friend liked since he was not affluent and ended up moving a fair piece and could have have borken down and set up again in an hour os less and it was quite sturdy Outbackers are listed in the HRO catalog but the Burbank, CA, HRO outlet didn't have any for show-and-tell on Friday. Again, the folks working there (all 2 of them) didn't have any technical info on that line. Three guys were in front of the new-radio long desk busy doing some kind of "knowledgeable" arguing a la RRAP style and I didn't care for more of that at 2:30 PM on a Friday afternoon. :-) 73, LA |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 3, 10:20�am, "K4YZ" wrote:
On Mar 2, 9:54?pm, " wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. *7* years, Steve. January 19, 2000. ;-) Oh, my, Jimmie Noserve has made that a "holiday" event? * * Nope. * * We just keep it out there to remind everyone what a lying dweeb you are, Lennie. Steve, Who is "we"? I was simply reminding you that it has been more than *7* years since Len wrote that he was "going for Extra right out of the box." He also wrote a few months back that he could pass the Extra with or without a Morse Code test, but he never made good on that boast. Also, what is the point of calling someone names like "lying dweeb" and "Lennie"? All it does is bring you down to their level of childish behavior. * * Or inept...But does it really matter? Len has since written that his "Extra right out of the box" statement was merely a "throwaway comment" and was "taken out of context". Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. Well, maybe. And maybe not. Time will tell. So will William, an arrow, and an apple... Most liars like him usually are. If he does what he said he'd do back then, he wouldn't be a liar or a no-show, right? * * *Point taken and rightly so. Well, there you have it. Why call someone a liar if they can prove you wrong by their own actions? *Far be it for Lennie to actually DO what he says he's going to do. Maybe. Anyone with sense knows that. Something beyond 1930s state of the art, I hope. Well, let's see...... In the 1930s, radio amateurs were using Morse Code, AM voice, and SSB voice modes, plus some forms of radio control of model aircraft. They were using MF, HF, and VHF. All of that still goes on today. What rig should he buy for CASH? How about an Icom IC-7800? ?Yaesu FT-2000D? IC-756PROIII? ?FT-DX9000? ?Kenwood TS-2000? Yaesu FT DX 9000MP? * * *How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?! That's "none of the above", Steve. * * *All of those radios require a federal license to operate other than to just turn on an listen to or admire the blinking lights. * * *You don't have a federal license that allows you to use any of them in the intended manner. * * (BTW: *Please don't waste our time with tales of your "professional" licensure...Your GROL is useless for Amateur applications as it does not grant station privileges or authorize a callsign) What antenna? How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic? * * Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie. Actually, Steve, you don't know that. One of the most common TV antennas is a log periodic. With some modification, one could be used for VHF/UHF amateur radio communication. Not that I'm recommending it, but it *could* be done. On a U S Tower HDX-5106MDPL? A Bencher Inc. "Skyhawk 3X10"? A Butternut HF9V? * * *Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness. What's with the namecalling, Steve? The products named could possibly be used. Recall too that Len has referred to an alleged "northern house" which is not the Lanark Street address. Perhaps the "northern house" has more land around it. CC&Rs? Gasp! I have to get one of those?!? I don't have any! ?HORRORS! * * No...You don't. * * But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that Log periodic on your block. All depends what sort of LP is meant. btw, "CC&R" means "Codes, Covenants and Restrictions". It's a pretty safe bet that there are detailed building codes for Len's Lanark Street property, and that putting up a tower requires a building permit at the very least. There may also be maximum height regulations, etc. There's also the fact that the antenna must not extend over adjacent properties without permission of the owners. Operating procedures? ABSOLUTELY! By-the-Book Letter-Perfect as it was in the 1930s so shall it be today!!! Commit just ONE slight infraction and I would be EXCOMMUNICATED!!! Stripped of all licenses and radios by Riley H. himself!!! **You have to HAVE a license to be stripped of, Lennie. * *And if you're using "1930's" procedures, you'll sound like an idiot on 21st century Amateur Radio... What is this fascination with the "1930s", anyway? If something works well, why change it? I am told that in the 1930s, people answered the telephone "Hello", same as today. Hams in those days called CQ, gave their own callsigns last when calling, used Q signals, RST, etc. - same as today. The common "QWERTY" keyboard arrangement of 2007 was in common use in the 1930s on mechanical typewriters and teleprinters. So in many ways, we are all still using "1930s" procedures today. Nothing wrong with that, either. Vanity call? *VANITY* CALL?!?!? Oh, my... Can't use "N2EY" or "K4YZ" or "K8MN"...those VANITY calls are TAKEN!!! Actually, N2EY and K8MN are not vanity callsigns. K4YZ and WK3C are vanity callsigns. If someone looks up a callsign on qrz.com, then requests 'detailed information', the FCC database codes are displayed. The codes tell things like which radio service the call is assigned to, type of station (club, individual, etc.) and whether the call is a vanity call or not. N2EY is not a vanity call. Neither is K8MN. Both were sequentially issued decades ago. Think about it. * * *Eight Days...No Lennie...No surprises there.................. Is that the best way to greet a possible newcomer, Steve? --- It's clear that the rules change has resulted in a lot of applications, which increases the processing time. It's way too early to see long-term trends based on short-term results. That's just common sense. For example, back on Feb 22, 2007, the last day before the rules changes, there were 654,680 current unexpired FCC-issued amateur radio licenses held by individuals. Of those, 324,326 (49.54%) were Technician or Tech Plus class licenses (293,508 and 30,818, respectively). As of March 3, 2007, yesterday, there were 654,551 current unexpired FCC-issued amateur radio licenses held by individuals. That's a *decrease* of 129. Of those 654,551 hams on March 3, 323,026 (49.35%) were Technician or Tech Plus class licenses (292,598 and 30,428, respectively). Does that mean the changes have failed to cause growth? I don't think so - I think it's simply too early to tell. Whether Len is part of that or not really isn't clear yet. Perhaps he is, perhaps he's not, and simply trying to get a reaction. Len has already admitted that he puts intentional errors in his postings in order to get a response. Do you really *want* Len to get an amateur license, Steve? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
|
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 4, 11:54�am, John Smith I wrote:
wrote: * ... No problem Len. But, make sure you purchase an antenna capable of BIG power. *First time you burn up one of those antennas with one of those BIG ruskie leen-e-airs--kinda hurts :( Since I'm not contemplating any "big russkie linears" or even US-made (or branded) on HF, not a problem here. However, "BIG" to me is about 10 to 40 KW RF Output. That is not allowed in US amateur radio regulations. It is also beyond the RF Exposure limits for us urban city dwellers. Now, not all my neighbors aren't the best of folks but I ain't wanting to create crispy critters next door... 73, LA |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
wrote:
... Well, anyway, if not for these six fingers, I don't think exposure to rf is all that dangerous. grin Actually, I did hear tell of guys up in alaska working on radar, decades ago and before microwave ovens, they found holding their hands over the slits in waveguides "warmed" their fingers--then some started ending up with pains in their hands--cooked partially fingers are painful! I have never heard of HF causing any medial problems which can be proved to relate. However, UHF and beyond is quite different ... JS -- http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
From: on 4 Mar 2007 11:08:30 -0800
Wowie...PREDICTABLE RESPONSES! I post to Miccolis and Robeson replies, the Miccolis "replies" to Robeson (but is really replying to me...). Damn, but that IS predictable! :-) On Mar 2, 9:54?pm, " wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: I was simply reminding you that it has been more than *7* years since Len wrote that he was "going for Extra right out of the box." He also wrote a few months back that he could pass the Extra with or without a Morse Code test, but he never made good on that boast. Now, now, Sister, curb your impatience, put down the ruler and start watching the callsign sites from about Wednesday onwards. That will match what Ted said about "10 to 15 days." :-) Also, what is the point of calling someone names like "lying dweeb" and "Lennie"? All it does is bring you down to their level of childish behavior. Tsk, tsk, "childish behavior." :-) Go thee over to RRAM and look at your own comment on "peak the grid and dip the plate" is INCORRECT. Wow, I make the first response to Coslo on his question and you have to jump in with flailing knuckle-spanking ruler! "Incorrect" "Incorrect." Gotta love it...:-) Len has since written that his "Extra right out of the box" statement was merely a "throwaway comment" and was "taken out of context". It was just that AT THE TIME. Tsk, you had to MANUFACTURE a Big Brouhaha over it much later! Gotta love it! :-) Well, there you have it. Why call someone a liar if they can prove you wrong by their own actions? No problem to you, Jimmie. You just manufacture something out of whole cloth... :-) What rig should he buy for CASH? How about an Icom IC-7800? ?Yaesu FT-2000D? IC-756PROIII? ?FT-DX9000? ?Kenwood TS-2000? Yaesu FT DX 9000MP? ? ? ?How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?! That's "none of the above", Steve. Riiiiight...she can't be bought...unless there's some morse code involved... How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic? ? ? Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie. Actually, Steve, you don't know that. Wow! Something that Miccolis and I agree on! :-) One of the most common TV antennas is a log periodic. With some modification, one could be used for VHF/UHF amateur radio communication. Nobody in my neighborhood has any "common TV antennas" unless you count satellite dishes. We have excellent cable TV service, both analog and digital (we have digital). House across the street and down one has no less than 4 sat dishes. :-) Not that I'm recommending it, but it *could* be done. Why do all that futzing around when one can be purchased? Save all the futzing time for radio operating... :-) ? ? ?Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness. What's with the namecalling, Steve? Standard Robesin Operating Procedure. :-) The products named could possibly be used. Recall too that Len has referred to an alleged "northern house" which is not the Lanark Street address. Perhaps the "northern house" has more land around it. Northern house is in Kitsap County, WA. Ten acres full of virgin evergreens 60 to 100 feet high. Will undergo some thinning out soon. Lots of good raw timber there that will fetch some nice dollars. :-) Mr. Real Estate Expert, just go to the Kitsap County and look it up. It is public knowledge in their records. Real Estate taxes are all paid on that one, too. :-) Donut that just frost 'em though? :-) CC&Rs? Gasp! I have to get one of those?!? I don't have any! ?HORRORS! ? ? No...You don't. ? ? But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that Log periodic on your block. All depends what sort of LP is meant. "Military style" rotatable...requires an 80 foot diameter circle clearance for full rotation. Just like the one at NADC Warminster, PA, over 30 years ago. No sweat. But, I don't like to live IN an antenna farm. Did that for half a year (2 square miles of antenna farm). To WHERE would I rotate that rotatable antenna? YOU are the self-defined "expert" on the area. Don't you KNOW? btw, "CC&R" means "Codes, Covenants and Restrictions". It's a pretty safe bet that there are detailed building codes for Len's Lanark Street property, and that putting up a tower requires a building permit at the very least. There may also be maximum height regulations, etc. Oh, my, Mr. Real Estate EXPERT doesn't KNOW EXACTLY? Tsk, tsk, from all the blathering you did on Zoning a few months ago, I thought you would KNOW! Here's a clue, Shylock: I live a mile from the edge of BUR; civilians know it as "Bob Hope Airport." The FAA must be advised if something is erected 200 feet above normal terrain. However, "normal terrain" goes higher than 300 feet above my back yard. :-) There's also the fact that the antenna must not extend over adjacent properties without permission of the owners. Not a problem in the back. Got a nice clearance space there for anything rotating in an 80-foot circle. You want to check that out? No problem. Just go to Mapquest and enter my USPS address. Get the address from some old Ham Radio bylines...hasn't changed for 44 years. :-) You can even see a somewhat dated aerial photo of the location, see the relative sizes of everything. Or, you could go to the L.A. County records, even get a topographic map of the area. Won't cost you much and you would be oh so EXACT on data! Don't you KNOW all those things? You said you "were familiar with the area" or words to that effect. Now IF you really were "familiar," then you would KNOW that I have NO, repeat NO cee-cees here at the southern house. None in the northern one. Go LOOK for that non-existant CC&R, Shylock, prove me wrong... It's clear that the rules change has resulted in a lot of applications, which increases the processing time. Tsk, so far, the vast majority have been just class changes, renewals, and vanity call applications. It's way too early to see long-term trends based on short-term results. That's just common sense. Define "way too early." The trend is already present. Even Dee Flint noticed it first-hand in her local VE group. Have YOU done anything to help newcomers to US amateur radio? Get them into the exam locations in the droves that all you morsemen PROMISED were going to happen? Does that mean the changes have failed to cause growth? I don't think so - I think it's simply too early to tell. When would be a good time for you to "tell?" 2027? 2017? You already stated that overall licensee numbers were dropping. Do you have very short attention span disorder? In the 11 days of 22 Feb to 4 Mar, the US total individual licensees dropped 369. That's over 3 a day average. That's been happening steadily for over three years. Whether Len is part of that or not really isn't clear yet. Perhaps he is, perhaps he's not, and simply trying to get a reaction. Jay-Suss! I've left enough clues for even an Inspector Clousseau to figure out! :-) Do you really *want* Len to get an amateur license, Steve? He doesn't *want* anything but suffering and death for ANYONE disagreeing with him. No one need be an Inspector "Clue-so" to see that! So, Sister, do you think you've got the cojonnes to reply to me directly or are you going to go through the SAME procedure as usual? :-) See you on the 13 cm bands... LA |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
On Mar 4, 3:09�pm, John Smith I wrote:
wrote: *... Well, anyway, if not for these six fingers, I don't think exposure to rf is all that dangerous. *grin Actually, I did hear tell of guys up in alaska working on radar, decades ago and before microwave ovens, they found holding their hands over the slits in waveguides "warmed" their fingers--then some started ending up with pains in their hands--cooked partially fingers are painful! I have never heard of HF causing any medial problems which can be proved to relate. *However, UHF and beyond is quite different ... Ahem...take a look at the chart in Part 97. Maximum allowed power before having to do an "evaluation" is 500 W at 40m but it drops down linearly to 50 W at 10m. All bands at VHF at 50 W. At UHF it is 70 W at 70cm and rises to a maximum of 250 W at 13 cm and holds there on up to maximum frequency of anyone's allocations. When I was at Fort Monmouth Signal School in '52 and taking the radar systems introductory class, cadre used to put a wad of steel wool on the end of a bamboo pole and hold it in front of a 1 MW peak search radar. Steel wool blazed! One of the wesen- heimers made a remark about "it was dangerous to steel wool" with much ha-ha-ing from the group. The next day we got a demo with a slab of outdated (uncut) bacon. Instant fried bacon. Wisenheimer shut up. Search radar was somewhere in S Band or 2 to 4 GHz. (microwave ovens are 2.4 GHz) When I worked at Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA division, one of the airborne radar final check-out guys got one hand slightly fried from playing around with adjustments with the (F-94?) radar. Wore a large bandage for about two months after returning from a medical leave of about a month. That was '57 to '59 time period. Peak powers ain't something to fool with, not up-close and personal to the RF source. On the other hand, the tower monkeys who service the TV and FM towers on Mt. Wilson overlooking L.A. aren't shielded and seem to survive. Was an article about them in L.A. Times about a half year ago. TV and FM sit right in the most sensitive frequency region for RF Exposure. Go figure... 73, LA |
No Code For Any Class x7 Days
wrote:
... Len: I always wanted a KW amp. Finally the old guy who assisted me into radio broke down, brought out the greenlee punches, drills, hacksaw, ceramic sockets, tubes and we constructed one, I certainly could NOT have done it with out his assistance. We scavenged old military gear I had accumulated and stuff he had for wide spaced (HV) variable caps, hv transformer, filter caps, chokes, resistors, plate coils, etc. In the end, it was rather large, plenty of space to work on stuff in there, and even room for an old LARGE muffin fan. My shack, back then was the basement of my parents home. It got cold down there in the winter, those tubes filaments (10amps at 2.5v if I remember correctly X 2, PLUS the plate dissipation when xmitting) provided some nice warmth (plates would glow a nice dim/dull red when ya got long winded and peaked her for max tube capacity)--I sat on the expanded metal case of that amp which sat upon a low stool, and enjoyed it! Later had three boys. Only bothersome thing is that third eye in the middle of their foreheads ... ROFLOL! Comeon', ya can't kid a kidder! Actually, that is a true story ... well, except for the third eyes. HF just doesn't excite the molecules in the body to the degree necessary to do damage (well, a 10kw-100KW I might begin to worry about.) VHF I would be cautious of, but then I think 50w is conservative and low here, UHF and above I have NO doubt about ... HF is about as dangerous as high powered audio freqs, excepting ones ears. JS -- http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON! when you going apologize steve
On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. Most liars like him usually are. sigh. Steve, K4YZ when you going to apoligize to af6ay? |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON! when you going apologize steve
On Mar 8, 8:03�am, "an_old_friend" wrote:
On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: * * *QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. * * *Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. * * *Most liars like him usually are. * * *sigh. Steve, K4YZ when you going to apoligize to af6ay? Mark, it will be a cold day in hell when he apologizes to anyone. Keep on wearing summer clothing. :-) 73, AF6AY |
just another stalking thread
On Mar 8, 1:59�pm, wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 10:34:02 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 8, 8:03?am, "an_old_friend" wrote: On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: * *RZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. * *ike I said...he's gonna be a no-show. ost liars like him usually are. * 3igh. Steve, K4YZ when you going to apoligize to af6ay? * Mark, it will be a cold day in hell when he apologizes * to anyone. *Keep on wearing summer clothing. *:-) I know and you know he knows and we know know he know it we arew a very knowldhe gruop with no apologies to Eleanor * 73, AF6AY http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - just another stalking thread http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Another Morgasm
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. Most liars like him usually are. sigh. Steve, K4YZ when you going to apoligize to af6ay? When are you going to apologize to K4YZ? |
No Code For Any Class x5 Days And NO LENNIE ANDERSON! when you going apologize steve
On Mar 8, 12:34�pm, "
wrote: On Mar 8, 8:03?am, "nobodys_old_friend" wrote: On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: ? ? ?QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. ? ? ?Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. ? ? ?Most liars like him usually are. ? ? ?sigh. Steve, K4YZ when you going to apoligize to af6ay? * *Mark, it will be a cold day in hell when he apologizes * *to anyone. *Keep on wearing summer clothing. Oooops...Wrong again! Especially since it's been done here before... So...Lennie...When do we actually get to hear you on the air? Steve, K4YZ |
Another Morgasm
On Mar 8, 4:44�pm, "Mork" Dork@anon wrote:
"nobodys_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: * * *QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson. * * *Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show. * * *Most liars like him usually are. * * *sigh. Steve, K4YZ when you going to apoligize to af6ay? When are you going to apologize to K4YZ? THAT won't EVER happen, Anymouse. Morkie's been caught in lie after lie and has yet to apologize for any of it..he ADMITS he's a liar, but won't apologize for any of the dozens he's been caught in. Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com