On Mar 4, 12:25�pm, "
wrote:

* *The military is IN the business of DESTRUCTION at the
* *very real fact of part of the military being destroyed in
* *the process of doing "defense." *

Wrong again.

The Armed Forces is in the business of defending the United States
and implementing of US foreign policy, by force of arms if necessary.

Even the most casual of reader of military teechnology knows that
the current state of the art of that "business" is LIMITING that
"destruction" (read that "collateral damage") at every possible level.

Today's military can do far more tactically and strategically
with far less damage than their forebearers did in World War 2.

If you'd like, I can suggest a couple of sources of research for
you to follow-up on so you can get future posts more accurate-
sounding...

Or....You can just go on pounding us with tons of windy arguments
about how since the correspondents weren't really "there" when "it"
happened, we can't possibly know what's going on....

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

On Mar 6, 1:48 am, "K4YZ" wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:25?pm, "
wrote:

? ?The military is IN the business of DESTRUCTION at the
? ?very real fact of part of the military being destroyed in
? ?the process of doing "defense." ?

Wrong again.

The Armed Forces is in the business of defending the United States
and implementing of US foreign policy, by force of arms if necessary.

Even the most casual of reader of military teechnology knows that
the current state of the art of that "business" is LIMITING that
"destruction" (read that "collateral damage") at every possible level.

Today's military can do far more tactically and strategically
with far less damage than their forebearers did in World War 2.

If you'd like, I can suggest a couple of sources of research for
you to follow-up on so you can get future posts more accurate-
sounding...

Or....You can just go on pounding us with tons of windy arguments
about how since the correspondents weren't really "there" when "it"
happened, we can't possibly know what's going on....

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

What would Robesin know of the armed forces? Perhaps he was reading a
1950's copy of "This is the Air Force..."