| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
March 4th 07, 08:04 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, but this is an actual policy issue posting...
wrote:
... technical side of US amateur radio regulations. It is a good sign of their (finally) leaving the old 1930s style of hamming behind. Don't knock it. 73, LA Don't kid yourself Len. They are there and right up front because they are PROFESSIONAL politicians, they are magicians-extraordinaire, their sleight of hand will make yer head spin and leave ya a wonderin' how that happened??? It is all about control ... and like any "arrl product", it ain't worth havin' if their hand has been involved! JS -- http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Moderator Policy for proposed rec.radio.amateur.policy.moderated | Policy | |||
| Policy Issue: Canadian Amateurs to Lose 220-222 MHz | Policy | |||
| how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning | Policy | |||
| Actual Shortwave Question | Shortwave | |||
| ACTUAL FOR SALES!! TS 140 , TS450Sat and MORE!! | Swap | |||
Threaded Mode
