Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. Your spin stops here. BTW. Did you "reign" as in dominating power? Or "rein" as in any means of curbing or controlling? Mark would certainly fit the latter definition. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:50:42 -0700,
wrote: On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. inddeed it musthave been galling to learn "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:53:11 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message get a life "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message roups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing jewbashing etc "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Then you admit that you flamed. You were told time after time that your floods were not welcome and were poor net practices, but you persisted to the point that a moderated group was formed to KEEP YOU OUT! Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing jewbashing etc Funny. Nowhere in my response did I mention "owger" or "gaybashing", you did, and do...to the point of nausea. You've worn that tired excuse out. I "eneged" in nothing of the sort, though I AM an unabashed Mark Morgan basher. For that I make no apologies, nor are any needed. A guilty conscience needs no accusing. -- "One useless dyslexic is a shame, 2 become a bisexual couple, and 3 or more become the voices in Mark's head." |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:07:13 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message .. . On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Then you admit that you flamed. no I admit no such thing ou were told time after time that your floods were not welcome so what they were regretaable needed and it worked by and large "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Then you admit that you flamed. no I admit no such thing ou were told time after time that your floods were not welcome so what they were regretaable needed and it worked by and large In short, by your own admission, you selfishly flamed. Yes, it worked out. A new, moderated group was formed because of your unneeded transgressions. -- "One useless dyslexic is a shame, 2 become a bisexual couple, and 3 or more become the voices in Mark's head." |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 27, 12:19 am, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:47:51 -0700, wrote: On Sep 25, 8:06 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:03:13 wrote: On Sep 25, 6:57 pm, Leo wrote: Hmmm - that title sounds a bit like the first Twilight Zone episode! Since the new moderated group was created (whose mission was to improve communication and raise the bar on decency over the Policy group), everyone seems to have disappeared. The moderated group is virtually dead, containing primarily bulletins from Amateur groups around the world and the odd post hare and there....and the Policy group has degenerated into a "Mark vs the World" quagmire - quite unfortunately for Mark. With the exception of Dave Heil, who pops up from behind the ramparts here occasionally to take a well placed shot at his old nemesis Mr. Wiseman, no one seems to be left from the old crowd who regularly discoursed in this group. Even N2EY's regular "ARS Numbers" posts seem to have vanished into oblivion. Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo I'm here. I'm not interested in .moderated. I do post some on-topic stuff, but no one wants to discuss it. For example, the ARRL gets it's own MARS call: Honestly more a RRAM topic than RRAP after why does the ARRL NEED a Mars Call Good question. Do you think they are just callsign collecting, or do you think they knowingly placed themselves into DoD service? honestly callsign collecting is my opinion after all just who is going to put in the time required to earn that Maras Call? Hiram Maxim back from the grave? Welp, they have a paid operator. In addition to the training, will he not send the w1aw morse practice 12 hours each month so he can meet the minimum input for MARS? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|