wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith





wrote:
Leo wrote:

...
Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is
well!

73, Leo

The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has
happened to my city ... :-(

Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated
ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain
control.

sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue

Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a
voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no-
coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't
have much to say to each other.

In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated
group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane
posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group.
Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very
distant second and third place.
Your spin stops here.

BTW. Did you "reign" as in dominating power? Or "rein" as in any means of
curbing or controlling?
Mark would certainly fit the latter definition.

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:47:51 -0700,
wrote:

On Sep 25, 8:06 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:03:13
wrote:





On Sep 25, 6:57 pm, Leo wrote:
Hmmm - that title sounds a bit like the first Twilight Zone episode!

Since the new moderated group was created (whose mission was to
improve communication and raise the bar on decency over the Policy
group), everyone seems to have disappeared. The moderated group is
virtually dead, containing primarily bulletins from Amateur groups
around the world and the odd post hare and there....and the Policy
group has degenerated into a "Mark vs the World" quagmire - quite
unfortunately for Mark.

With the exception of Dave Heil, who pops up from behind the ramparts
here occasionally to take a well placed shot at his old nemesis Mr.
Wiseman, no one seems to be left from the old crowd who regularly
discoursed in this group. Even N2EY's regular "ARS Numbers" posts
seem to have vanished into oblivion.

Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is
well!

73, Leo

I'm here. I'm not interested in .moderated.

I do post some on-topic stuff, but no one wants to discuss it. For
example, the ARRL gets it's own MARS call:

Honestly more a RRAM topic than RRAP after why does the ARRL NEED a
Mars Call

Good question. Do you think they are just callsign collecting, or do
you think they knowingly placed themselves into DoD service?

honestly callsign collecting is my opinion

after all just who is going to put in the time required to earn that
Maras Call? Hiram Maxim back from the grave?

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:50:42 -0700,
wrote:

On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith





wrote:
Leo wrote:

...
Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is
well!

73, Leo

The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has
happened to my city ... :-(

Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated
ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain
control.

sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue

Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a
voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no-
coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't
have much to say to each other.

inddeed it musthave been galling to learn

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:53:11 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message

get a life

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith





wrote:
Leo wrote:

...
Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is
well!

73, Leo

The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has
happened to my city ... :-(

Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated
ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain
control.

sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue

Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a
voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no-
coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't
have much to say to each other.

In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated
group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane

becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing
justified to selence a nocoders

posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group.

BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should
have been

Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very
distant second and third place.

funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing
jewbashing etc


"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith





wrote:
Leo wrote:

...
Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all
is
well!

73, Leo

The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has
happened to my city ... :-(

Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a
"stated
ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to
maintain
control.

sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue

Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a
voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no-
coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't
have much to say to each other.

In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated
group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane

becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing
justified to selence a nocoders

posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this
group.

BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should
have been

Then you admit that you flamed. You were told time after time that your
floods were not welcome and were poor net practices, but you persisted to
the point that a moderated group was formed to KEEP YOU OUT!

Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very
distant second and third place.

funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing
jewbashing etc

Funny. Nowhere in my response did I mention "owger" or "gaybashing", you
did, and do...to the point of nausea. You've worn that tired excuse out. I
"eneged" in nothing of the sort, though I AM an unabashed Mark Morgan
basher. For that I make no apologies, nor are any needed.
A guilty conscience needs no accusing.

--
"One useless dyslexic is a shame, 2 become a bisexual couple, and 3 or more
become the voices in Mark's head."

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:07:13 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
egroups.com...
On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith





wrote:
Leo wrote:

...
Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all
is
well!

73, Leo

The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has
happened to my city ... :-(

Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a
"stated
ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to
maintain
control.

sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue

Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a
voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no-
coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't
have much to say to each other.

In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated
group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane

becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing
justified to selence a nocoders

posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this
group.

BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should
have been

Then you admit that you flamed.

no I admit no such thing

ou were told time after time that your
floods were not welcome

so what they were regretaable needed and it worked by and large



"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

wrote:

...
Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a
voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no-
coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't
have much to say to each other.


Yes, as usual, you are relevant ...

Will this result in some learning/changes? No? :-(

Regards,
JS

In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated
group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of
inane

becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing
justified to selence a nocoders

posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this
group.

BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should
have been

Then you admit that you flamed.

no I admit no such thing

ou were told time after time that your
floods were not welcome

so what they were regretaable needed and it worked by and large

In short, by your own admission, you selfishly flamed.
Yes, it worked out. A new, moderated group was formed because of your
unneeded transgressions.
--
"One useless dyslexic is a shame, 2 become a bisexual couple, and 3 or more
become the voices in Mark's head."

On Sep 27, 12:19 am, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:47:51 -0700,
wrote:





On Sep 25, 8:06 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:03:13
wrote:

On Sep 25, 6:57 pm, Leo wrote:
Hmmm - that title sounds a bit like the first Twilight Zone episode!

Since the new moderated group was created (whose mission was to
improve communication and raise the bar on decency over the Policy
group), everyone seems to have disappeared. The moderated group is
virtually dead, containing primarily bulletins from Amateur groups
around the world and the odd post hare and there....and the Policy
group has degenerated into a "Mark vs the World" quagmire - quite
unfortunately for Mark.

With the exception of Dave Heil, who pops up from behind the ramparts
here occasionally to take a well placed shot at his old nemesis Mr.
Wiseman, no one seems to be left from the old crowd who regularly
discoursed in this group. Even N2EY's regular "ARS Numbers" posts
seem to have vanished into oblivion.

Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve,
Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is
well!

73, Leo

I'm here. I'm not interested in .moderated.

I do post some on-topic stuff, but no one wants to discuss it. For
example, the ARRL gets it's own MARS call:

Honestly more a RRAM topic than RRAP after why does the ARRL NEED a
Mars Call

Good question. Do you think they are just callsign collecting, or do
you think they knowingly placed themselves into DoD service?

honestly callsign collecting is my opinion

after all just who is going to put in the time required to earn that
Maras Call? Hiram Maxim back from the grave?

Welp, they have a paid operator. In addition to the training, will he
not send the w1aw morse practice 12 hours each month so he can meet
the minimum input for MARS?