Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leo wrote:
... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith
wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Regards, JS "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. Your spin stops here. BTW. Did you "reign" as in dominating power? Or "rein" as in any means of curbing or controlling? Mark would certainly fit the latter definition. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message roups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing jewbashing etc "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Then you admit that you flamed. You were told time after time that your floods were not welcome and were poor net practices, but you persisted to the point that a moderated group was formed to KEEP YOU OUT! Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing jewbashing etc Funny. Nowhere in my response did I mention "owger" or "gaybashing", you did, and do...to the point of nausea. You've worn that tired excuse out. I "eneged" in nothing of the sort, though I AM an unabashed Mark Morgan basher. For that I make no apologies, nor are any needed. A guilty conscience needs no accusing. -- "One useless dyslexic is a shame, 2 become a bisexual couple, and 3 or more become the voices in Mark's head." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:07:13 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message .. . On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been Then you admit that you flamed. no I admit no such thing ou were told time after time that your floods were not welcome so what they were regretaable needed and it worked by and large "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 27, 12:37 am, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:40:18 -0500, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane becuase they supported the atack made against of course anything ebing justified to selence a nocoders As despicable as many of Mark's posting were and are, they were the only means available to counter the incessant heinous attacks he suffered at the hands of Robesin, Wiseman, with the nod from the cronies. Unfortunately, Mark's postings were necessary. posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. BTW I never claimed they were a welcome addition or that they should have been That's the way I see it, too. Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. funny if Steve and owger and YOU were not eneging in your gaybashing jewbashing etc Everyone posts something off topic at some time or another, but a select few incessantly posted objectional, despicable material. That's been covered ad infinitum. Anyway, Robesin is mostly absent from RRAP which is a good thing. If only the cronies had suggested that he cool it with his incessant homo- erotic attacks. Hell everything from Morse Code to Military Service to MARS was attack material for that jerk... |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 10:40 pm, "Rogie" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 25, 8:40 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:22 -0700, John Smith wrote: Leo wrote: ... Just wondering - what's up with Len, Mike,Dave, Jim, Brian, Steve, Dee, Kim, and the rest of the old regulars on the group? Hope all is well! 73, Leo The perverts have rein--however, what is new, the same thing has happened to my city ... :-( Besides, it seems that policy was not an interest, it was just a "stated ruse" to allow the CW Proclaimers to have voice and attempt to maintain control. sadly that seemed to have been the whole root of of that issue Sadly they grew upset that folks who weren't code advocates found a voice on policy, so they created a moderated group to exclude the no- coders. After the initial back-slapping, they found that they didn't have much to say to each other. In all reality, despite your claims otherwise, they formed the moderated group mainly in response to Mark Morgan's hundreds upon hundreds of inane posts that were more of a pestilence than a welcome addition to this group. Mark is THE primary culprit, with one or two others bringing up a very distant second and third place. Your spin stops here. Nope, go back and read the archives. The cronies originally put forth the idea of a moderated group to exclude non-amateurs from having a voice in an amateur newsgroup. That's where the idea come from. They discovered it was "too hard" so one of the cronies proposed that he would make a BBS. He decided that was "too hard." So they sat on their duffs until someone else came along and did the hard work. Morse Code is truly their only claim to fame. BTW. Did you "reign" as in dominating power? Or "rein" as in any means of curbing or controlling? Mark would certainly fit the latter definition. You'll have to go back up the chain and ask "assembly whiz" or whoever wrote that. Regardless, Robesin was the catalyst for most of the bad behavio[u]r on rrap. If he had apologized for mining the web and bringing back non-amateur related information to policy, and his incessant outrageous claims and accusations.... He's a bad citizen no matter what neighborhood he pops in to. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|