| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thomas" wrote in message ...
Thank you! I read the official FCC text carefully. But I'm now even more confused: "If you operate a radio that has been approved exclusively under the rules that apply to FRS, you are not required to have a license. FRS radios have a maximum power of ? watt (500 milliwatt) effective radiated power and integral (non-detachable) antennas. If you operate a radio under the rules that apply to GMRS, you must have a GMRS license. GMRS radios generally transmit at higher power levels (1 to 5 watts is typical) and may have detachable antennas." The "FRS" channels were interstitial frequencies of the GMRS in the first place. That's why GMRS can still use them. Only a radio specifically designed for FRS applications may be used license free. Any other radio is GMRS and must be licensed. If my radio has been approved under both FRS and GMRS, the text above **seems** to suggest that I may need a license. Can you or someone clarifies for me? The only reason I don't want to use GMRS is the license fee. The radio is very cheap even with GMRS support. I agree with Phil...Pop for the GMRS license...One day you'll need it and it will save your bacon...Or at least save you from an FCC NAL! 73 Steve, K4CAP |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 28 Jun 2003 15:54:55 -0700, stewart wrote:
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message m... Only a radio specifically designed for FRS applications may be used license free. Any other radio is GMRS and must be licensed. Bull****. Yes,. "stewart", the rest of your diatribe sure is. There are MANY FRS/GMRS hybrids on sale at Wal-Mart, K-Mart, etc. That is true, You CAN use them on the FRS freqs without a license. That is not true. Go and learn a little FCC law in the area of FRS and type certification and then come back and talk to the folks who do understand the law. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane A real communications lawyer who deals in these interpretations for a living |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil Kane" wrote in message . com...
Go and learn a little FCC law in the area of FRS and type certification and then come back and talk to the folks who do understand the law. Buzz off. You don't know what you are talking about. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 28 Jun 2003, stewart wrote:
"Phil Kane" wrote in message . com... Go and learn a little FCC law in the area of FRS and type certification and then come back and talk to the folks who do understand the law. Buzz off. You don't know what you are talking about. Like you do? Your history of posts (on RRAP) clearly shows that you do not. Go play with your MURS radios and leave FRS alone. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:38:27 GMT, D. Stussy wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2003, stewart wrote: "Phil Kane" wrote in message . com... Go and learn a little FCC law in the area of FRS and type certification and then come back and talk to the folks who do understand the law. Buzz off. You don't know what you are talking about. Like you do? Your history of posts (on RRAP) clearly shows that you do not. Go play with your MURS radios and leave FRS alone. Dieter - don't waste your time talking to a jackass who knows nothing about radio regulatory matters and refuses to learn from those who do. We're getting nowhere with him - time to break the link. 30. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||