Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 30th 03, 02:07 AM
stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ...
stewart wrote:

"Phil Kane" wrote in message . com...

Go and learn a little FCC law in the area of FRS and type
certification and then come back and talk to the folks who do
understand the law.


Buzz off. You don't know what you are talking about.


Yeah, Phil....don't try to throw reality or legality into The Stew. He's most unaccustomed to all that.


Idiots.

Quit cross-posting about issues that you Morse throwbacks know NOTHING
about. It is bad enough that you morons argue ENDLESSLY trying to
salvage what's left of the archaic Morse regulations... but when your
BS starts to spill over into other groups, your confusing,
narrow-minded negativism is totally unhelpful.... but, I suppose
THAT'S what you folks are ALL ABOUT, right?

- Stewart
  #2   Report Post  
Old June 30th 03, 02:49 AM
D. Stussy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 29 Jun 2003, stewart wrote:
"Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ...
stewart wrote:

"Phil Kane" wrote in message . com...

Go and learn a little FCC law in the area of FRS and type
certification and then come back and talk to the folks who do
understand the law.

Buzz off. You don't know what you are talking about.


Yeah, Phil....don't try to throw reality or legality into The Stew. He's most unaccustomed to all that.


Idiots.

Quit cross-posting about issues that you Morse throwbacks know NOTHING
about. It is bad enough that you morons argue ENDLESSLY trying to
salvage what's left of the archaic Morse regulations... but when your
BS starts to spill over into other groups, your confusing,
narrow-minded negativism is totally unhelpful.... but, I suppose
THAT'S what you folks are ALL ABOUT, right?


Stop obsessing on that which you know nothing of. Anyway, Stewart, you are the
idiot that insisted on posting the FRS/GMRS crap here - even though it is
"Class A CB" and therefore belongs on "rec.radio.cb", and your MURS crap which
has NO appropriate place because we all know it is NOT a legitimate radio
service, but a manufacturer's mistake that the FCC bought into.

Regardless, not everyone here remains in favor of Morse Code. If there were a
"codeless extra" available, then I might have one! That's how little I use
morse code. Unfortunately, my license history ruins that - it shows that I
have at least 13WPM (having held an Advanced class from 1993 to 2000). :-(

Personally, I find it antiquated, but it may come in handy in a "survival
situation" where a canibalized radio is no longer capable of voice comms.

--
Stewart: Your refrigerator is running; better go catch it. All the "cold" may
escape!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews General 0 September 24th 04 05:53 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 24th 04 05:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 25th 04 07:29 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017