FCC's response to my inquiry on license of FRS/GMRS

June 30th 03, 09:25 PM

Scott Seidman

Posts: n/a

"AMHAM73" wrote in
news:RQ0Ma.85500$Pc5.60639@fed1read01:

http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/18/3/?nc=1

This was for a guy was causing "intentional interference", and he seemed
real destructive "to get attention". How about your man on the street who
just uses a GMRS for normal communication?

--
Scott
Reverse first field of address to reply

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access	Lloyd Mitchell	Antenna	43	October 26th 04 01:37 AM
Amateur Radio NewslineÃ¢â€žÂ¢ Report 1402 Ã‚Â June 25, 2004	Radionews	Dx	0	June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio NewslineÃ¢â€žÂ¢ Report 1402 Ã‚Â June 25, 2004	Radionews	Dx	0	June 25th 04 07:28 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004	private	General	0	May 10th 04 09:39 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules	JJ	General	159	August 12th 03 12:25 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Menu

About Us