| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore informative to consider the totals of the two classes, since the Technician class includes a significant number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as Technician. The interesting aspect of the renewed Tech+ as simply Techs is that from that 4/15/00 date onward there really is no way for anyone to know if a particular tech operating in the Novice segments of HF is actually authorised to do so since the FCC database doesn't record the prior tech+ status, nor does it reflect if/when a tech may have obtained a 5wpm CSCE certificate after 4/15/00. Hmmm - are you sure the database doesn't show the previous license class, Bill? The only HF privileges allowed to Novices and code- tested Techs are Morse Code on parts of 80/40/15/10, and some 10 meter SSB. So if you hear a Tech operating Morse Code, chances are they could pass the test anyway. Which only leaves 10 ssb. If you look at the enforcement letters from FCC, they have gone after Techs for operating HF in excess of their privileges. But such violations have always been obvious, like a Tech operating 20 or 40 meter SSB. I do know that FCC expects Techs who have passed a code test to retain license documents proving that fact. FCC has put some real oddities into the code-tested-Tech rules. For example, if someone can produce a license document from before February 14, 1991 that clearly says "Technician", they get credit for Element 1. If they can produce a license document that clearly says "Novice" or "Technician Plus", they also get credit for Element 1. These rules apply even if the documents are for a license that expired decades ago, and even if the person holds no current license. But a CSCE for Element 1 that is more than 365 days old conveys no test element credit at all. Yet if the person with the expired Element 1 CSCE is a Technician, that person retains their HF privileges. Seems to me that FCC expects that active hams who are Techs should simply get a General or Extra. If the NPRM is enacted, Techs who are not code tested will have to get a General or Extra to get any HF at all. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
| First BPL License Awarded - | Boatanchors | |||
| First BPL License Awarded - | Boatanchors | |||