.."Steve Robeson, K4CAP" wrote in message
m...
(Hans K0HB) wrote in message
. com...
Part 97 does not assign me any responsibility to ensure that a
frenchman is operating inside his frequency allocations, only that I
am operating inside mine.

If a frenchman calls me on 6-meters I will certainly answer him since
F is a new band-country for me on 6.

Did any of you work the "Principality of Sealand" a few years back? (1SL
prefix)

http://hamgallery.com/qsl/Unverified/s1ad.htm

Pretty interesting story and kinda fun to watch the debate on eHAm and QRZ
rekindled a few years back. (Although it was the first time I'd ever heard
of it.) One camp refused to recognize them as a sovereign entity (Mostly
British) while the other camp's motto was WFWL. (Work First Worry Later) The
British govt. actually forbid their licensees to contact TPoS.

73 de Bert
WA2SI

Hey TIT how they hangin?

"JJ" wrote:

Larry, this a major problem with
our society today, people like kim
who don't care what anyone else
thinks. Just as long as they can do
whatever they want and get what
they want. (snip)


Excuse me, JJ. When did a lack of conformity become a "major problem" in
this country? Our forefathers, with their relatively strange political and
social ideas, were hardly conformists.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Actually, Dwight, the only "place"
that my callsign gets so much
discussion is right here in this
newsgroup. I have been involved
in a lot of stuff since I've had this
callsign--on the air, off the air,
women and men, served agencies,
hundreds of other amateurs. No
where, once, did my callsign ever
get discussed, and there was plenty
of opportunity. (snip)


I don't doubt that, Kim. The debate here only points to how far some in
this newsgroup are out of touch with reality.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote:

(snip) I would hardly refer to what
Riley Hollingsworth so elequently
stated as bringing the ARS "...one
step closer to extinction" as "living
life beautifully." That is the perverted
construct of an equally perverted
mind. (snip)


Do you still have the full text of that message from Hollingsworth, Larry?
If so, please post a copy so we can all see it. I know you posted it before,
but that was some time ago.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net...
"William" wrote

Hans, Bill, would you do so even after you knew their 6M
authorizations?

They're responsible for observing their band limits. I'm responsible
for observing mine.

WFWL.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

PS: For more info on your namesake, Little Billy Beeper, go here.
http://www.handiham.org//article.php?sid=160

(You're welcome!)

I understand that you would -knowingly- work a ham out of band.

If I got it wrong, please correct me.

"William" wrote


I understand that you would -knowingly- work a ham out of band.


Dear Little Billy Beeper,

Does Captain Code know you're working us here? (Go to
http://www.handiham.org/local/blind/beeper.txt for details.)

I will not go out of my band allocation to work anyone, but I will work
anyone with an amateur radio callsign who calls me inside my band
allocations.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:

Do you still have the full text of that message from Hollingsworth, Larry?
If so, please post a copy so we can all see it. I know you posted it before,
but that was some time ago.

As I recall it, there was NO PROOF that Larrah's "Hollingsworth letter"
was the real thing.

We all have to take Larrah's typed-in words as "truth."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH!

LHA / WMD












I am learning how to laugh maniacially through mail-order lessons of
how to be a gunnery nurse. :-)

In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Actually, Dwight, the only "place"
that my callsign gets so much
discussion is right here in this
newsgroup. I have been involved
in a lot of stuff since I've had this
callsign--on the air, off the air,
women and men, served agencies,
hundreds of other amateurs. No
where, once, did my callsign ever
get discussed, and there was plenty
of opportunity. (snip)


I don't doubt that, Kim. The debate here only points to how far some in
this newsgroup are out of touch with reality.

Dwight, that's all too common in computer-modem "communications,"
just as it is with morse code beeping on ham band ragchews.

No real clues on a person, no human data input, just a lot of
imagination and too much concentration on the writer in a public
forum. Those with an agenda, a hatred of something/somebody,
living in a quasi-fantasyland, brainwashed into a different reality,
are all into their own "reality of sight and sound," just like a
Twilight Zone.

To those too caught up in the unreality don't have a hobby of ham
radio anymore, they have a Lifestyle and Belief. Any puncturing of
that fantasy will send them off into paroxysms of rage, offense at
imagined slights, and the usual bigot's demands of What is Right
Should Be Right.

U.S. amateur radio seems to be another center for national
misogyny. It is a hobby activity engaged in largely by white
males.

LHA / WMD