"Kim W5TIT" wrote

No. You don't. Not in a "general" list you are compiling, where you have
made no mention of how people will be listed. It was intended by me--and
was when I first submitted my prediction--that I would be listed *just as
every other amateur radio operator.* You *do not*, Jim--whether you think
you do or not--have the right to *disascociated* me from my callsign.
Period. But, especially in a list where you've invited people to join,
yet
you did not say anyone would be listed in any way differently than anyone
else.

You have prevented my callsign being associated with other amateur radio
operators in a list where you treated them differently (by listing them
with
a callsign). You have prevented, by mere omission of my callsign, me from
being viewed as an amateur radio among other amateur radio operators in a
list in which such omission could easily be taken out of context, I might
add.


Anyway, I feel victorious, but maybe it's just me. As I said, I really do
have the opinions stated in this response and really do believe you should
have offered anything but leaving my callsign off the list. But, my
greater
purpose was to leave you with that same, frustrated feeling I used to have
when you'd box me into a corner I couldn't get out of. Maybe you don't
feel
boxed...but you sure were getting defensive and unexpectedly insulted--at
least it looked that way to me in this post!



Kim --- Jim has every right to not include your callsign in his messages.

Jim --- Kim has every right to feel whatever she feels about that, and to
post messages which make her "feel victorous" in return.

In other words, you both have the right to make yourselves look like
laughable self-righteous sanctimonious twits, and you both are certainly
doing a superb job of that.

All the high-sounding babble about usenet attribution rules is exactly
that..... babble.

Attribute that.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Kim W5TIT" wrote

No. You don't. Not in a "general" list you are compiling, where you
have
made no mention of how people will be listed. It was intended by
me--and
was when I first submitted my prediction--that I would be listed *just
as
every other amateur radio operator.* You *do not*, Jim--whether you
think
you do or not--have the right to *disascociated* me from my callsign.
Period. But, especially in a list where you've invited people to join,
yet
you did not say anyone would be listed in any way differently than
anyone
else.

You have prevented my callsign being associated with other amateur radio
operators in a list where you treated them differently (by listing them
with
a callsign). You have prevented, by mere omission of my callsign, me
from
being viewed as an amateur radio among other amateur radio operators in
a
list in which such omission could easily be taken out of context, I
might
add.


Anyway, I feel victorious, but maybe it's just me. As I said, I really
do
have the opinions stated in this response and really do believe you
should
have offered anything but leaving my callsign off the list. But, my
greater
purpose was to leave you with that same, frustrated feeling I used to
have
when you'd box me into a corner I couldn't get out of. Maybe you don't
feel
boxed...but you sure were getting defensive and unexpectedly
insulted--at
least it looked that way to me in this post!



Kim --- Jim has every right to not include your callsign in his messages.

Jim --- Kim has every right to feel whatever she feels about that, and to
post messages which make her "feel victorous" in return.

In other words, you both have the right to make yourselves look like
laughable self-righteous sanctimonious twits, and you both are certainly
doing a superb job of that.


Oh, wait. Oh, never mind. I thought I was seeing Hans with something other
than a gorilla thumping message. My mistake.


All the high-sounding babble about usenet attribution rules is exactly
that..... babble.

Attribute that.


At least we can.


With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB


Kim W5TIT

"Kim W5TIT" wrote

I thought I was seeing Hans with something other
than a gorilla thumping message.

I never thump my gorilla. My dad said I'd go blind if I did.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

KØHB wrote:
"Kim W5TIT" wrote


I thought I was seeing Hans with something other
than a gorilla thumping message.


I never thump my gorilla. My dad said I'd go blind if I did.


Just do it till you need glasses, Hans.

- Mike KB3EIA -

"Mike Coslo" wrote


Just do it till you need glasses, Hans.


I'm already wearing tri-focals.

dit dit, de Hans, K0HB

"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Mike Coslo" wrote


Just do it till you need glasses, Hans.


I'm already wearing tri-focals.

dit dit, de Hans, K0HB

I find the progressive lenses much more comfortable and useful myself.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

In article om, "Dee D.
Flint" writes:

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Mike Coslo" wrote


Just do it till you need glasses, Hans.


I'm already wearing tri-focals.

dit dit, de Hans, K0HB

I find the progressive lenses much more comfortable and useful myself.

In an effort to be convivial, double-D sounds off like she has a pair!

LHA / WMD

In article et, "KØHB"
writes:

"Kim W5TIT" wrote

I thought I was seeing Hans with something other
than a gorilla thumping message.

I never thump my gorilla. My dad said I'd go blind if I did.

Quit the monkey business in public...

LHA / WMD

KØHB wrote:


All the high-sounding babble about usenet attribution rules is exactly
that..... babble.


Just like all the high and mighty amateurs that seem to think it's a
good idea to follow the rules while on the air.

If ya breaks the usenet rulez, you getz flamed.

Mike KB3EIA -

In article et, "KØHB"
writes:

Kim --- Jim has every right to not include your callsign in his messages.

I agree.

Jim --- Kim has every right to feel whatever she feels about that, and to
post messages which make her "feel victorous" in return.

I agree again.

In other words, you both have the right to make yourselves look like
laughable self-righteous sanctimonious twits, and you both are certainly
doing a superb job of that.

We're just following your lead, Hans.

All the high-sounding babble about usenet attribution rules is exactly
that..... babble.

Foma! All foma!


Attribute that.

I got yer attributions right here....

With all kind wishes,


73 de Jim, N2EY