| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message ink.net... Finally, I noticed most of the callsigns above belong to males (all except one, a club call). The absence of any comment about those callsigns (from Riley, you, or others here) makes me wonder if a callsign with the letters "TIT" only becomes vulgar when used by a woman. Would Riley say those callsigns bring Ham radio "one step closer to extinction?" Would Jim omit those callsigns from his list (the topic this thread spun off from)? Would you as aggressively challenge one of those guys, like you've done with Kim, if any one of them were active in this newsgroup? Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ No it only becomes vulgar when chosen as a vanity call for the purpose of "getting in someone's face". If a person were to choose it because there name was something like "Tonya Irene Tidwell" and they wanted their initials, it is not vulgar. However parents are often careful not to name their children such that the initials would give rise to unwelcome teasing and other problems. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
| Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
| From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
| REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
| REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||