"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

No it only becomes vulgar when
chosen as a vanity call for the
purpose of "getting in someone's
face". If a person were to choose
it because there name was
something like "Tonya Irene
Tidwell" and they wanted their
initials, it is not vulgar. (snip)


However, given the topic of this discussion (children and the ARS one
step
closer to extinction), how is one supposed to know the difference between
the in your face "TIT" and the "TIT" initials? In the end, without a
specific context, it's just a callsign. And how would a callsign bring the
ARS one step closer to extinction?


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Thank you. And, as someone else pointed out, if a kid derives the word
"tit" from my callsign, it AIN'T because I taught 'em. *Anyone* who thinks
kids are still that innocent these days, has not been on a schoolyard or
listening in on kids' conversations when they think no one is around--and
I've even heard Kindergartners speaking of some pretty risque topics. Sad
but true.

Kim W5TIT