Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message ... "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... Here's the question? Tell us WHY the FCC wouldn't dump the code test now? WOW, that is a good question. And, one I don't think I have a good answer for. So, maybe the FCC will just drop it. The only thing I can generally think of, is that they have no more "incentive" to drop it than to just leave it as it is. But the FCC does indeed have an incentive...simplification of the licensing process and minimizing rules to the fullest extent possible. Cheers, Bill K2UNK Going back to the "corporate entity" theory; the FCC would spend more dollars revamping the program than to just stay with it the way it is. Yey that ISwhat they are paid to do. And, dropping the CW element wouldn't do a thing in terms of minimizing any R&R, would it? Sure it would. It reduces test requirements and avoids processing the Element 1 has been passed data from VECs. More likly than the above, however, will be the movement of other countries to a nocode structure (e.g. UK, Netherlands, and others). It appears...although I don't know the legal detains for those countries, that they may move to nocode within weeks or only a few months. Cheers, Bill K2UNK Kim W5TIT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |