Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 4th 03, 04:04 PM
lk
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

Alun Palmer wrote in message
...
Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he-

http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html

Easy there fellas...The TREATY requirement may be negated, but we
are still under FCC regulation...let's give them a day or two to see
how they are going to handle this.


I think the FCC's hands are tied until the treaty is ratified. Then all it
should take is what I remember being called an "Executive Order" dumping
Element 1.

It could be as simple as 'Effective (fill in date here), completion of

Element
1 is waived as a license requirement". One sentence.


I think the FCC will, at minimum update, Part 97 for the WRC 2003 changes.
They could do it with a "Memorandum Opinion & Order", or update Part 97
and restructure frequency allocation with a Notice of Proposed Rule Making.

This should be a hot topic at the VEC conference held at the end of July.

I would not expect much action until August. But that just a guess.

Larry KC8EPO



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine General 206 January 6th 04 01:12 PM
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement David Stinson Boatanchors 41 August 29th 03 02:33 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017