RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   CW Requirement Abolished (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/26586-cw-requirement-abolished.html)

Alun Palmer July 4th 03 02:37 AM

CW Requirement Abolished
 
Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he-

http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html

Steve Robeson, K4CAP July 4th 03 07:35 AM

Alun Palmer wrote in message . ..
Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he-

http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html


Easy there fellas...The TREATY requirement may be negated, but we
are still under FCC regulation...let's give them a day or two to see
how they are going to handle this.

73

Steve, K4YZ

lk July 4th 03 01:55 PM


"Bill Sohl" wrote in message
...

"Alun Palmer" wrote in message
...
Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he-

http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html


Here's the rewrite of 25.5 and 25.6


The IARU web site has release it final report on WRC 2003.

You can read the full report at: http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html

The final version of S25.5 & S25.6 a

25.5 §3 1) Administrations shall determine whether or not a person
seeking a licence to operate an amateur station shall demonstrate
the ability to send and receive texts in Morse code signals.


25.6 2) Administrations shall verify the operational and technical
qualifications of any person wishing to operate an amateur station.
Guidance for standards of competence may be found in the
most recent version of Recommendation ITU-RM.1544.
----------
They say the effective date is July 5, 2003.


And adopted July 4, 2003 Independence Day!

Larry



lk July 4th 03 04:04 PM


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

Alun Palmer wrote in message
...
Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he-

http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html

Easy there fellas...The TREATY requirement may be negated, but we
are still under FCC regulation...let's give them a day or two to see
how they are going to handle this.


I think the FCC's hands are tied until the treaty is ratified. Then all it
should take is what I remember being called an "Executive Order" dumping
Element 1.

It could be as simple as 'Effective (fill in date here), completion of

Element
1 is waived as a license requirement". One sentence.


I think the FCC will, at minimum update, Part 97 for the WRC 2003 changes.
They could do it with a "Memorandum Opinion & Order", or update Part 97
and restructure frequency allocation with a Notice of Proposed Rule Making.

This should be a hot topic at the VEC conference held at the end of July.

I would not expect much action until August. But that just a guess.

Larry KC8EPO




Phil Kane July 4th 03 11:55 PM

On 04 Jul 2003 13:00:54 GMT, N2EY wrote:

I think the FCC's hands are tied until the treaty is ratified. Then all it
should take is what I remember being called an "Executive Order" dumping
Element 1.


"Executive Order" is what its name implies - and order by the
President. Regulatory agencies don't work on that level. It will
be an Order - probably by the Chief of the Wireless Telecomm Bureau
or even the Division Chief under delegated authority. If we're
lucky it will be without NPRM or NOI because it removes a burden
on the licensee.

It could be as simple as 'Effective (fill in date here), completion of Element
1 is waived as a license requirement". One sentence.


One can hope.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



Donald R. Putnick July 5th 03 12:04 PM

D. Stussy wrote:
....OK, so when do the "no code extras" start? :-)


Hi Dieter, be careful. If we're out of CW testing jobs,
Tak and I will have time to hassle you front table guys!
--
Don Putnick


N2EY July 5th 03 01:23 PM

In article , "D. Stussy"
writes:

And adopted July 4, 2003 Independence Day!


....OK, so when do the "no code extras" start? :-)

You in The Pool, yet? (see thread by that name)

73 de Jim, N2EY


Bill Sohl July 5th 03 01:40 PM


"D. Stussy" wrote in message
. org...
And adopted July 4, 2003 Independence Day!


....OK, so when do the "no code extras" start? :-)


Join the "pool" party and add your quesstimate. There's
another thread that is carrying the quesses.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK




Vshah101 July 5th 03 03:09 PM

I wrote:

Its Fri 10pm, July 4, Independence Day- Ham. DOH!!!

HaHaHaHaHa!


Sorry, I take that back. Although there are more fitting times when you did
deserve it, on this occasion it does not necessarily deserve a HaHa.

Too bad. Now it has lost its impact. I already said that (HaHaHaHaHa!), so now
I can't say that again when it truly does apply.


Robert Casey July 5th 03 04:15 PM

Phil Kane wrote:



It could be as simple as 'Effective (fill in date here), completion of Element
1 is waived as a license requirement". One sentence.



One can hope.



I'd think that they would just edit the list of requirements for the
various ham
licenses. The code requirement would just be deleted. It would go from

Tech: element 2
General elements 1, 2 and 3
Extra elements 1, 2, 3 and 4

to

Tech element 2
General elements 2 and 3
Extra elements 2, 3 and 4

Where element 1 is the 5wpm code, 2 is tech written, 3 is general
written, and
4 is the extra written.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com