Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alun Palmer wrote in message . ..
Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he- http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html Easy there fellas...The TREATY requirement may be negated, but we are still under FCC regulation...let's give them a day or two to see how they are going to handle this. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Sohl" wrote in message ... "Alun Palmer" wrote in message ... Yes it's true. The final report of WRC 2003 is he- http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html Here's the rewrite of 25.5 and 25.6 The IARU web site has release it final report on WRC 2003. You can read the full report at: http://www.iaru.org/rel030703.html The final version of S25.5 & S25.6 a 25.5 §3 1) Administrations shall determine whether or not a person seeking a licence to operate an amateur station shall demonstrate the ability to send and receive texts in Morse code signals. 25.6 2) Administrations shall verify the operational and technical qualifications of any person wishing to operate an amateur station. Guidance for standards of competence may be found in the most recent version of Recommendation ITU-RM.1544. ---------- They say the effective date is July 5, 2003. And adopted July 4, 2003 Independence Day! Larry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04 Jul 2003 13:00:54 GMT, N2EY wrote:
I think the FCC's hands are tied until the treaty is ratified. Then all it should take is what I remember being called an "Executive Order" dumping Element 1. "Executive Order" is what its name implies - and order by the President. Regulatory agencies don't work on that level. It will be an Order - probably by the Chief of the Wireless Telecomm Bureau or even the Division Chief under delegated authority. If we're lucky it will be without NPRM or NOI because it removes a burden on the licensee. It could be as simple as 'Effective (fill in date here), completion of Element 1 is waived as a license requirement". One sentence. One can hope. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "D. Stussy"
writes: And adopted July 4, 2003 Independence Day! ....OK, so when do the "no code extras" start? :-) You in The Pool, yet? (see thread by that name) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D. Stussy" wrote in message . org... And adopted July 4, 2003 Independence Day! ....OK, so when do the "no code extras" start? :-) Join the "pool" party and add your quesstimate. There's another thread that is carrying the quesses. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wrote:
Its Fri 10pm, July 4, Independence Day- Ham. DOH!!! HaHaHaHaHa! Sorry, I take that back. Although there are more fitting times when you did deserve it, on this occasion it does not necessarily deserve a HaHa. Too bad. Now it has lost its impact. I already said that (HaHaHaHaHa!), so now I can't say that again when it truly does apply. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kane wrote:
It could be as simple as 'Effective (fill in date here), completion of Element 1 is waived as a license requirement". One sentence. One can hope. I'd think that they would just edit the list of requirements for the various ham licenses. The code requirement would just be deleted. It would go from Tech: element 2 General elements 1, 2 and 3 Extra elements 1, 2, 3 and 4 to Tech element 2 General elements 2 and 3 Extra elements 2, 3 and 4 Where element 1 is the 5wpm code, 2 is tech written, 3 is general written, and 4 is the extra written. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |