Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Phil Kane" wrote in
.net: On 10 Jul 2003 05:33:32 -0700, Brian wrote: It is not clear why Class 2 operators must stay above 144 MHz, as WARC '79 changed the lower limit for no-coders to 30 MHz, but I guess it is because of countries who had not implemented that at the time the areement was originally written. They may not want amateurs transmitting on a VHF-Low TV channel. ISTR that most European countries dumped VHF-low channels many years ago and that the UK dumped both VHF-Lo and Hi when they went to the 625 line PAL colour system from the 405 line b/w system. Perhaps someone "over there" can correct or update that info. Alun ?? -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane It's true about the UK. I don't know about the other countries. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |