Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 11th 03, 04:38 AM
Alun Palmer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Phil Kane" wrote in
.net:

On 10 Jul 2003 05:33:32 -0700, Brian wrote:

It is not clear why Class 2 operators must stay above 144 MHz, as
WARC '79 changed the lower limit for no-coders to 30 MHz, but I guess
it is because of countries who had not implemented that at the time
the areement was originally written.


They may not want amateurs transmitting on a VHF-Low TV channel.


ISTR that most European countries dumped VHF-low channels many
years ago and that the UK dumped both VHF-Lo and Hi when they
went to the 625 line PAL colour system from the 405 line b/w system.

Perhaps someone "over there" can correct or update that info.

Alun ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane




It's true about the UK. I don't know about the other countries.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine General 206 January 6th 04 01:12 PM
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement David Stinson Boatanchors 41 August 29th 03 02:33 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017